Avenger wrote:
>>
>> Avenger wrote:
>>>> There are only a few men I would ever be happily submissive to. There
>>>> was someone I knew who was good looking like Keith Urban
>>>
>>> Never heard of him. Females are very superficial so I guess he was some
>>> boytoy type. All that other crap you wrote about being funny,
>>> intelligent,
>>> witty blah blah blah is just smoke. There are plenty of short or ugly
>>> men
>>> with those qualitities who you would treat worse than a dog.
>>
>> I bet if the genders here were reversed, some guy writing about a woman
>> that looked like a supermodel or somesuch, there would be feminists
>> squalling about how "superficial" men are. That's how you're sounding.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, but them's the breaks. It's the law of attraction and
>> evolution. Women who have been economically independent, have decent
>> incomes and so forth, tend to prefer men with appealing physical and
>> personal characteristics. Just as men prefer pretty women over "Ugly
>> Bettys". Studies bear this out. If you make enough money to support
>> yourself, why would you want to choose to live with an unappealing
>> person?
>>
>> I'm not saying it's correct or fair. That's just usually the way
>> things are. I know you like discussing evolution, so you have to
>> realize that this is a bitter pill to swallow.
>
> It's not bitter for me at all since I get any female I choose and I only
> choose the best.
>
>
>>
>>> (minus all the
>>>> chemical dependency problems), tall, brilliant, funny, always had
>>>> something intelligent to say, loved to read and educate himself, and
>>>> always tried to be complimentary about me and my work.
>>>
>>> Oh I get it now. It was some prole who looked liked this Urban jerk haha
>>
>> If you don't like it, you can always go to the gym and take some
>> personal improvement courses.
>
> Why would I do that or want to hang around some smelly fat people? At 6' and
> 175lbs I hardly need it No I'm not short but most short guys with all the
> qualities you seem to admire wouldn't get a second look from a female and
> would be instantly dismissed. In fact, they would be more than just
> dismissed they'd be completely invisible. So don't give me this bullshit
> about qualitites females want. Females are 100%% superficial and judge purely
> on looks and sexual attraction and if they get the other qualitities it's a
> bonus.
>
>
>
> Learn to do the same thing that women
>> have known about for centuries.
>>
>> There's also a false dichotomy lurking about, here, suggesting that if
>> someone's attractive they must not be intelligent or inventive.
>
> I never said that and in fact I believe the opposite.The stereotype of the
> good looking dumb blonde is a myth. On average better looking people are
> smarter but there is really very little difference in intelligence in the
> general population and 9 out of 10 people are pretty much alike.
>
>
> Sorry,
>> Charlie, but the two aren't mutually exclusive. (OTOH if the guy had
>> the looks but no brains, I wouldn't have been interested).
>
> You'd be interested in anything with a cock lol
You sure love making stuff up, don't you? Wonder how much else on here
you're making up?
>>> I would gladly
>>>> be submissive to someone like that. ...Not some schlub who sits around
>>>> watching television or spending all his time on Usenet dissing women.
>>>> Unfortunately, types like the aforementioned are few and far between.
>>>
>>> A good female is almost impossible to find. Television was invented for
>>> females to babysit them while doing the housework.
>>
>> NASCAR, anyone?
>
> What's that? Some show on TV? I don't own a TV and just occasionally see it
> in passing.
>
>>
>>> Otherwise that might get
>>> into some mischief. And you can thank men for the internet poofy.
>>
>> What kind of grapes make that vintage whiiiiiine? ...Sour ones! LOL
>>
>> (And what's an "internet poofy"?)
>
> Don't bother replying to this freak. He's a sick old homo manic depressive
> who can go on for days when he's off his Lithium. Never argue with fools or
> the insane it only encourages them. This poofter will even argue with
> himself when no one pays attention to him. He's one sick puppy.
I don't even know who or what you're addressing now, or if you're
projecting or what. But since this "conversation" has now apparently
deteriorated into rambling nonsensical storytelling, I guess I'll go
with the third guess and not reply to you any more.
> "Poofy's Problem: Rebel Without A Cause
>
> If you've ever seen this film you will quickly identify Poofy as James
>> Dean (except Poofy's short, fat, bald and old ,not to mention a queer).
>> His father in the film
>> is completely pussy whipped by his wife and granny. In one scene, which I
>> always have to laugh at, the old man is doing the dishes in a female's
>> apron lol
>> When Dean is drunk he tells his father, who at the time is being abused
>> and henpecked by the two harridans, "you know I would just once like to
>> see you haul off and belt mom"
>> We know what Poofy's problem is ;)
>
> Poofy is a good example of what happens to a person when there is no strong
> Patriarch in the home. He secretly despises his weak pussy whipped pappy and
> grandpappy and transfers that hatred onto all men.
>
>
>>
