Evolution is slow and may take another million years
and even then we may get just what we have today with men dominating
everything due to their higher intelligence. All life on earth is based on
dominance and the pecking order. This is how it developed and there's
nothing you can do about it no matter how much you stamp your little foot
Poofy.
There are Alpha men and Beta men but ALL men are above females in dominance,
this is the LAW of Nature. If we artificially put females into positions of
power or authority over men it could mean the end of human life on earth if
it became the norm. You understand nothing in the big picture of life and
think your lame brained theories worked out in grandpappy's cellar and
financed by your welfare cheque mean something, rather than being the
rantings of a psycho. You're ignorant of biology and medicine and don't
understand how different processes are interrelated and if you disrupt one
there will be consequences. Females were never intended by Nature to be in a
dominant position over men and their primary job is to get pregnant and
reproduce more humans. Their primary job is not to have a "career" although
I'm not against females working to earn their keep.Reproduction is actually
more important than life because everyone is going to eventually die but
without reproduction the entire species will die out. Putting females in ...

Avenger wrote:

Its fun watching humanity "do itself in" .......looks like we won't
need a big asteroid or meteor afterall. lol.

Avenger wrote:

This, is the main and only point. Women leaders are incapable of
maintaining our species. There is only one solution: All women must be
shipped to sex farms.

There are only a few men I would ever be happily submissive to. There
was someone I knew who was good looking like Keith Urban (minus all the
chemical dependency problems), tall, brilliant, funny, always had
something intelligent to say, loved to read and educate himself, and
always tried to be complimentary about me and my work. I would gladly
be submissive to someone like that. ...Not some schlub who sits around
watching television or spending all his time on Usenet dissing women.
Unfortunately, types like the aforementioned are few and far between.

feminists are anti- life. period. they dont have children anymore. they
should gassed.
Avenger wrote:

Avenger wrote:

I bet if the genders here were reversed, some guy writing about a woman
that looked like a supermodel or somesuch, there would be feminists
squalling about how "superficial" men are. That's how you're sounding.

Avenger wrote:

It's obvious that Sojourner doesn't get out much. Urban is a pretty
boy and all the other stuff was made up by his PR people to sell
records to the likes of Sojourner. Real Men like Jim Morrison and
Hendrix would have been blown off by Sojourner for "chemical dependency
problems". Sojourner doesn't want a real man, like most women she
wants a man she can control. Us hippies in the Sixties intentionally
blew off girls like her...they were the feminists that were sending us
to Vietnam. Then the few we hung out with got bitter and joined the
second wavers. Damn, American Men can't win.

Masculist wrote:

Hi Tom,

That's not my handle. :) Also, I get out plenty -- remember those
road trips?

Avenger wrote:

Ohsojourner wrote: