|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Apr 15, 2008 09:06
This is a non-partisan public service announcement.
Any residents of Greater London who, for whatever reason, are not yet
registered to vote and wish to do so in the forthcoming elections for
the Mayor of London and the Greater London Assembly on 1st May "must
register by midnight 16th April 2008"...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2008/03/25/how_to_vote_feature.shtm...
In practice I'd think this means that anyone wishing to do a last
minute registration needs to visit the office of their borough's
Electoral Registration Officer tomorrow *in person* during their
office opening hours.
Note that as well as British & Commonwealth citizens, as this is a
local election it is also open to citizens of EU member states who
live in Greater London.
More info at the 'London Elects' website here:
http://www.londonelects.org.uk/registering_to_vote.aspx
This thread will now descend into partisan bickering... (and I ain't
going to get involved!).
|
| |
|
| | 17 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Apr 15, 2008 11:26
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Mizter T wrote:
> This thread will now descend into partisan bickering...
GO BRIAN, GO BRIAN, GO BRIAN, GO BRIAN GO!
> (and I ain't going to get involved!).
Awww.
tom
--
There is no latest trend.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian F.Ian F. Date: Apr 15, 2008 11:42
> Any residents of Greater London who, for whatever reason, are not yet
> registered to vote and wish to do so in the forthcoming elections for
> the Mayor of London and the Greater London Assembly on 1st May "must
> register by midnight 16th April 2008"...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Apr 15, 2008 12:48
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Ian F. wrote:
>> Any residents of Greater London who, for whatever reason, are not yet
>> registered to vote and wish to do so in the forthcoming elections for
>> the Mayor of London and the Greater London Assembly on 1st May "must
>> register by midnight 16th April 2008"...
Well, not quite. But it's pointless using your *second* vote for anyone
other than Ken or Boris, or using it at all if your first vote is for Ken
or Boris - assuming that it's Ken and Boris who make it through to the
second round, that is.
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian F.Ian F. Date: Apr 15, 2008 13:10
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.64.0804152047110.10133@urchin.earth.li...
> Well, not quite. But it's pointless using your *second* vote for anyone
> other than Ken or Boris, or using it at all if your first vote is for
> Ken or Boris
Got it.
> To me, this seems elementary. I'm surprised to read comments that a lot
> of people don't understand the system;
Well, I had no idea that that was the position - and I'm *really*,
*really* clever. ;-)
But now I know...well then, it's just the one vote for me.
Ian
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: John BJohn B Date: Apr 15, 2008 14:33
On Apr 15, 7:42 pm, "Ian F." googlemail.com> wrote:
Terrible piece from Gilligan (quelle surprise). He implies that it
won't make a blind bit of difference whether Ken-or-Boris wins on
first-preference votes or second preference votes.
This is rubbish. If the first-round outcome were 33 Ken / 33 Boris /
32 Brian / 2 nutters, and the second-run outcome were 51 Boris / 40
Ken / 9 nobody, then this would make a massive difference to the three
parties' positions, strategies, and behaviour over the next few years
- both in London and nationwide - compared to a first-round outcome of
51 Boris / 40 Ken / 7 Brian (with no second preferences cast) / 2
nutters. But the final outcome would be the same.
|
| Show full article (1.58Kb) |
| 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: James FarrarJames Farrar Date: Apr 15, 2008 17:42
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:48:40 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote:
>On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Ian F. wrote:
>
>>> Any residents of Greater London...
|
| Show full article (1.19Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian F.Ian F. Date: Apr 15, 2008 23:57
"James Farrar" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1lia04hb0ic5aolli591ags1f7stbqe0c0@4ax.com...
> But if it isn't,
But it will be.
Ian
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: James FarrarJames Farrar Date: Apr 16, 2008 00:13
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:57:21 +0100, "Ian F."
googlemail.com> wrote:
>"James Farrar" gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1lia04hb0ic5aolli591ags1f7stbqe0c0@4ax.com...
>
>> But if it isn't,
>
>But it will be.
Almost certainly.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Apr 16, 2008 06:06
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, James Farrar wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:48:40 +0100, Tom Anderson
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Ian F. wrote:
>>
>>> "Mizter T" gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ef45c087-5e6c...
|
| Show full article (2.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|