On 12 Dec, 09:33, Mwmbwls virgin.net> wrote:

That article's bollocks. This is the redevelopment of several blocks
north of the station (including the bus station and District/Circle
tube entrance), but it doesn't involve the mainline station at all.

A quick search of Google News says this is the original source, and
doesn't contain this error:
http://www.propertyweek.com/story.asp?sectioncode=297&storycode=3101964&c=1

The Times has rewritten it here, introducing mention of the mainline
station:
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/construction_and_property/article3019604...

And Transport Briefing has taken this and run with it, merging it with
some random junk from this old press release:
http://www.capitalcommitment.co.uk/site/media_release.aspx?id=46

In message
y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, Mr
Thant googlemail.com> writes

Interesting to see in that report that the development has to make
provision for Crossrail 2.