|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Apr 23, 2008 13:42
I've been trying to get a handle on exactly what this amounts to but
have failed to find any details diagrams or descriptions. Does anyone
have any or understand what's what?
My current under-informed guess:
- Trains from the Brighton fasts to Thameslink will go over it
- The Brighton Down Slow will go under it
- Thameslink trains from the SEML fasts will go over it (crossing the
Brighton Down Slow?)
- Kent trains to Charing Cross will go under it
- Where do Charing Cross trains from the Brighton fasts go - over it?
past it? either side of it?
Thanks.
U
|
| |
|
| | 13 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Paul ScottPaul Scott Date: Apr 23, 2008 16:57
> I've been trying to get a handle on exactly what this amounts to but
> have failed to find any details diagrams or descriptions. Does anyone
> have any or understand what's what?
>
> My current under-informed guess:
> - Trains from the Brighton fasts to Thameslink will go over it
> - The Brighton Down Slow will go under it
> - Thameslink trains from the SEML fasts will go over it (crossing the
> Brighton Down Slow?)
> - Kent trains to Charing Cross will go under it
> - Where do Charing Cross trains from the Brighton fasts go - over it?
> past it? either side of it?
>
I have a pdf download of a Thameslink Environmental Statement from Jun 2004,
which has some drawings of the Bermondsey and Tanners Hill areas, but I
can't find it on the web anywhere now. Can I email it to you?
Extracts:
|
| Show full article (1.43Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Apr 24, 2008 00:11
On 24 Apr, 00:57, "Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote:
> I have a pdf download of a Thameslink Environmental Statement from Jun 2004,
> which has some drawings of the Bermondsey and Tanners Hill areas, but I
> can't find it on the web anywhere now. Can I email it to you?
That'd be excellent, thanks.
> I think it is significant that there are 4 tracks taken under the
> 'Thameslink pair' - another point I recall reading in recent days was
> something about 'no Thameslink trains off the SEML fasts' - can't lay my
> hands on that either though!
None off the North Kent network I think is the current decision.
There are 4 fast from Orpington which are the only Kent Thameslink
trains via London Bridge (there are two more via Elephant.
(all from the South London RUS)
U
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Peter MassonPeter Masson Date: Apr 24, 2008 01:04
> I've been trying to get a handle on exactly what this amounts to but
> have failed to find any details diagrams or descriptions. Does anyone
> have any or understand what's what?
>
> My current under-informed guess:
> - Trains from the Brighton fasts to Thameslink will go over it
> - The Brighton Down Slow will go under it
> - Thameslink trains from the SEML fasts will go over it (crossing the
> Brighton Down Slow?)
> - Kent trains to Charing Cross will go under it
> - Where do Charing Cross trains from the Brighton fasts go - over it?
> past it? either side of it?
>
The track diagram in the February 2007 MR shows the four tracks using the
diveunder to be the Down Charing Cross Slow, the Down Charing Cross Fast,
the Up Charing Cross (only splits into Fast and Slow at Southwark Park
Junction) and the Down Brighton Slow. At that time the assumption was that
Thameslink - South Eastern trains would go to Dartford via the Slow Lines at ...
|
| Show full article (1.68Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Apr 24, 2008 06:23
On 24 Apr, 09:04, "Peter Masson" privacy.net> wrote:
> The track diagram in the February 2007 MR shows the four tracks using the
> diveunder to be the Down Charing Cross Slow, the Down Charing Cross Fast,
> the Up Charing Cross (only splits into Fast and Slow at Southwark Park
> Junction) and the Down Brighton Slow.
So in summary, from the diagrams Paul sent me, the flyover appears to
create:
- At the north end, a grade separated junction between the BML fasts
and SEML slows onto the Thameslink route
- At the south end, a grade separated junction between the Thameslink
route (BML fasts) and the LB terminus route (BML slows)
- In the middle, a route for the SEML passing underneath the
Thameslink route to get to to Charing Cross (two dedicated tracks plus
the north track)
|
| Show full article (1.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Peter MassonPeter Masson Date: Apr 24, 2008 07:05
"Mr Thant" googlemail.com> wrote
>
> That's a very good point. But as long as the crossing move was done
> before all the fast trains through Lewisham join the line (ah, so
> that's what the Tanner's Hill flydown upgrade is for), it shouldn't be
> a big deal.
>
> There'll still be many flat junctions handling >20 tph.
>
In particular, Ewer Street Junction where the Fast and Slow Charing Cross
lines converge for the 2-track section through Metropolitan and Borough
Market Junctions to London Bridge. At present the signaller can choose to
make the crossing move at either Ewer Street or Metropolitan Junctions, but
in future will not want to use Metropolitan Junction for this because of
conflicts with Thameslink. Also Tanners Hill Junction. Presumably the peak
timetable will be designed to accommodate parallel moves at these two
junctions (e.g. a down Charing Cross to Lewisham train passes Tanners Hill
Junction at the same time as an up Lewisham to Charing Cross train) - all
very well in the train plan, but liable to fall to pieces if anything is
running out of course. ...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MIGMIG Date: Apr 24, 2008 07:26
On 24 Apr, 15:05, "Peter Masson" privacy.net> wrote:
> "Mr Thant" googlemail.com> wrote
>
>> That's a very good point. But as long as the crossing move was done
>> before all the fast trains through Lewisham join the line (ah, so
>> that's what the Tanner's Hill flydown upgrade is for), it shouldn't be
>> a big deal.
>
>> There'll still be many flat junctions handling >20 tph.
>
> In particular, Ewer Street Junction where the Fast and Slow Charing Cross
> lines converge for the 2-track section through Metropolitan and Borough
> Market Junctions to London Bridge. At present the signaller can choose to
> make the crossing move at either Ewer Street or Metropolitan Junctions, but
> in future will not want to use Metropolitan Junction for this because of
> conflicts with Thameslink. Also Tanners Hill Junction. Presumably the peak
> timetable will be designed to accommodate parallel moves at these two
> junctions (e.g. a down Charing Cross to Lewisham train passes Tanners Hill
> Junction at the same time as an up Lewisham to Charing Cross train) - all
> very well in the train plan, but liable to fall to pieces if anything is ...
|
| Show full article (2.11Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Peter MassonPeter Masson Date: Apr 24, 2008 11:50
"MIG" doreenbird.co.uk> wrote
>
> Are contra-peak Charing Cross to/from Lewisham trains envisaged?
>
I can't see how the evening peak can be run without them. With 28 tph from
Charing Cross there'll have to be 28 tph contra-peak (passenger or ecs) into
Charing Cross. So there'll be 28 tph each way through Tanners Hill Junction.
Some of the down trains will run to Lewisham, and have to cross the Up Fast
Line at Tanners Hill Junction. Realistically the only way of doing this is
to have trains from Lewisham to Charing Cross parallelling them through the
junction.
The 1976 evening peak timetable included 28 tph from Charing Cross, but of
these 3 crossed at Spa Road and ran via Greenwich, and 3 crossed to the Slow
Line at North Kent East, so only 22 ran on the Fast Line at Tanners Hill
Junction.6 of these ran via the spur. On the Up Fast there were 22 trains
through Tanners Hill Junction (these had to cross the 6 down via the spur),
with another 3 coming via Greenwich and crossing at Spa Road.
Peter
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MIGMIG Date: Apr 25, 2008 02:43
On 24 Apr, 19:50, "Peter Masson" privacy.net> wrote:
> "MIG" doreenbird.co.uk> wrote
>
>> Are contra-peak Charing Cross to/from Lewisham trains envisaged?
>
> I can't see how the evening peak can be run without them. With 28 tph from
> Charing Cross there'll have to be 28 tph contra-peak (passenger or ecs) into
> Charing Cross. So there'll be 28 tph each way through Tanners Hill Junction.
> Some of the down trains will run to Lewisham, and have to cross the Up Fast
> Line at Tanners Hill Junction. Realistically the only way of doing this is
> to have trains from Lewisham to Charing Cross parallelling them through the
> junction.
It would be a handy new connection if they did. At the moment, there
are a few services which, in lieu of being ecs, just start at Hither
Green and provide extra frequency between London Bridge and Waterloo,
which is a peak flow for people going south west.
Maybe the equivalents of those will be able to divert through, and
call at, Lewisham as well.
|
| Show full article (1.46Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Peter MassonPeter Masson Date: Apr 25, 2008 03:59
"MIG" doreenbird.co.uk> wrote
>
> It would be a handy new connection if they did. At the moment, there
> are a few services which, in lieu of being ecs, just start at Hither
> Green and provide extra frequency between London Bridge and Waterloo,
> which is a peak flow for people going south west.
>
> Maybe the equivalents of those will be able to divert through, and
> call at, Lewisham as well.
>
AIUI the RUS envisages that the peak service will consist as far as possible
of the off-peak service plus peak extras, rather than what has been the case
on the South eastern network up till now, i.e. until the 1970s London Bridge
resignalling a standard pattern off-peak service but no discernible peak
pattern at all, and since the resignalling a 20-minute peak cycle (later
eased to 21 minutes when BR invented the 63 minute hour) which bears no
discenible relation to the off-peak pattern. If this is the case the
Bexleyheath route, and North Kent via Woolwich and Lewisham, will get
contra-peak Charing Cross services via the doubled Tanners Hill spur. If
they manage to get this right it will mean that the only stations not to get ...
|
| Show full article (1.33Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|