|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Feb 21, 2008 18:02
[crossposted to uk.transport.london]
Shades of the finished but unopened Shepherd's Bush (Overground)
station on the West London Line, as documented on the London
Connections weblog:
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/search/label/Shepherd%%27s%%20Bush
(ignore any references to the closure of the Central line's Shepherds
Bush tube station)
How wide is a platforms supposed to be? Well, how long is a piece of
string...
On 22 Feb, 01:13, XxXxXx nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> Row over platform width delays Sandhills station reopening.
>
> by David Bartlett, Liverpool Daily Post
>
> THOUSANDS of Merseyside commuters and...
|
| Show full article (3.96Kb) |
|
| | 6 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Peter MassonPeter Masson Date: Feb 22, 2008 00:35
"Mizter T" gmail.com> wrote
>How wide is a platform supposed to be? Well, how long is a piece of
>string...
"Platforms to be not less than 6 feet wide"
(from the requirements of the Inspecting Officers of Railways, 29 April
1858)
The standard may have change during the past 150 years.
Peter
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Feb 22, 2008 00:53
On 22 Feb, 02:02, Mizter T gmail.com> wrote:
> How wide is a platforms supposed to be? Well, how long is a piece of
> string...
The guideline is 2.5m. But decoding the article, it looks like Network
Rail wanted to reopen the station before they'd finished all work, and
the 2m width we're talking about is to a temporary construction
hoarding, for which they were presumably hoping to get a waiver.
U
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: David HansenDavid Hansen Date: Feb 22, 2008 01:02
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:35:45 -0000 someone who may be "Peter Masson"
privacy.net> wrote this:-
>"Platforms to be not less than 6 feet wide"
>(from the requirements of the Inspecting Officers of Railways, 29 April
>1858)
>
>The standard may have change during the past 150 years.
I may be wrong, but I doubt the original part of the platforms at
South Gyle are that wide, though the later extensions probably are.
The extensions are wider due to a change in the minimum width
requirements, but the extensions are at one end of the platforms
(the ends furthest from the main entrances and exits).
These platforms are dangerously narrow for the number of people
using them and a fair proportion of trains pass them at considerable
speed. If it wasn't for the huge railway cost increases since
privatisation I imagine they would have been widened by now.
|
| Show full article (1.03Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: John BJohn B Date: Feb 22, 2008 01:43
On 22 Feb, 08:53, Mr Thant googlemail.com>
wrote:
>> How wide is a platforms supposed to be? Well, how long is a piece of
>> string...
>
> The guideline is 2.5m. But decoding the article, it looks like Network
> Rail wanted to reopen the station before they'd finished all work, and
> the 2m width we're talking about is to a temporary construction
> hoarding, for which they were presumably hoping to get a waiver.
The idiots at TfL and Merseyrail really ought to be shot. Far better
to have a platform that's 2m wide than no station at all...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Feb 22, 2008 02:37
On 22 Feb, 09:43, John B johnband.org> wrote:
> On 22 Feb, 08:53, Mr Thant googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> How wide is a platforms supposed to be? Well, how long is a piece of
>>> string...
>
>> The guideline is 2.5m. But decoding the article, it looks like Network
>> Rail wanted to reopen the station before they'd finished all work, and
>> the 2m width we're talking about is to a temporary construction
>> hoarding, for which they were presumably hoping to get a waiver.
>
> The idiots at TfL and Merseyrail really ought to be shot. Far better
> to have a platform that's 2m wide than no station at all...
>
|
| Show full article (1.70Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: tim (not at home)tim (not at home) Date: Feb 22, 2008 11:59
"Mizter T" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:45901b42-daea-42fd-a52c-8b8f0ec8dc5f@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
[crossposted to uk.transport.london]
Shades of the finished but unopened Shepherd's Bush (Overground)
station on the West London Line, as documented on the London
Connections weblog:
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/search/label/Shepherd%%27s%%20Bush
(ignore any references to the closure of the Central line's Shepherds
Bush tube station)
How wide is a platforms supposed to be? Well, how long is a piece of
string...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMHO it does look like they were 'aving a larf when they pulled out the
string that they were going to use at Shepherd's Bush.
Next to a major new shopping center this was likely to be a busy station.
tim
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|