|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: John RowlandJohn Rowland Date: Jul 17, 2008 19:11
|
| |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
  |
|
Author: John RowlandJohn Rowland Date: Jul 17, 2008 19:32
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Jeremy ParkerJeremy Parker Date: Jul 22, 2008 09:22
"Tom Anderson" wrote
[snip]
> I was thinking the other day that it would be nice to exhume some
> of the lost rivers. Completely impractical, of course, but nice.
>
> More plausibly, how about making the surface parts of the New River
> more accessible? AFAIK, most of it's fenced off at the moment.
I think that both are actual projects. I seem to recall reading
recently that Boris wants to write exhuming rivers into the London
Plan, when the Plan gets revised over the next couple of years to
de-Ken-ise it. I seem to recall that the Wandle is beginning to
re-emerge.
The New River already has been made more accessible, I think,
although I don't explore where it goes often enough to know details.
I'm not sure where the river stops being functional now that the Ring
Main is in business
Jeremy Parker
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: John BJohn B Date: Jul 22, 2008 12:02
On 22 Jul, 17:22, "Jeremy Parker" compuserve.com> wrote:
>
> The New River already has been made more accessible, I think,
> although I don't explore where it goes often enough to know details.
> I'm not sure where the river stops being functional now that the Ring
> Main is in business
Was there on Saturday, to my mild surprise. It goes from approximately
Highbury to approximately Canonbury, without any evidence of any
actual flowing - certainly, I'd be amazed if that stretch were
actually used for water delivery. But it's a nice (albeit rather
short) walk.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Ian JelfIan Jelf Date: Jul 22, 2008 16:44
In message news.demon.co.uk>, Jeremy Parker
compuserve.com> writes
>
>"Tom Anderson" wrote
>
>[snip]
>
>> I was thinking the other day that it would be nice to exhume some
>> of the lost rivers. Completely impractical, of course, but nice.
>>
>> More plausibly, how about making the surface parts of the New River
>> more accessible? AFAIK, most of it's fenced off at the moment.
>
>I think that both are actual projects. I seem to recall reading
>recently that Boris wants to write exhuming rivers into the London
>Plan, when the Plan gets revised over the next couple of years to
>de-Ken-ise it. I seem to recall that the Wandle is beginning to
>re-emerge.
>
>The New River already has been made more accessible, I think, ...
|
| Show full article (2.55Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Jul 23, 2008 05:21
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Ian Jelf wrote:
> In message news.demon.co.uk>, Jeremy Parker
> compuserve.com> writes
>>
>> "Tom Anderson" wrote
>>
>>> I was thinking the other day that it would be nice to exhume some
>>> of the lost rivers. Completely impractical, of course, but nice.
[snip excellent truths about the New River]
> I'm not sure that the plans for opening out rivers are fully thought
> out. They were often culverted for a reason. Yes, often that was due to
> pollution which wouldn't be an issue in the same way today; but often
> it was to reduce flooding, too. I'm not sure that the good folks of
> Westbourne Grove fancy the Westbourne lapping its way through the
> Whiteley's building. (Okay an exaggeration perhaps but you get the
> idea.)
|
| Show full article (1.88Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: John RowlandJohn Rowland Date: Jul 23, 2008 05:32
Tom Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, John Rowland wrote:
>
>> John Rowland wrote:
I must have been thinking about bell peppers... I meant to say "Does the
bell still ring"
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Paul TerryPaul Terry Date: Jul 23, 2008 11:56
In message , Tom
Anderson writes
>There's a building somewhere in the City where a stub of some ancient
>monastery or something, exposed when the building was constructed, runs
>across the lobby, and it creates a fascinating space with a powerful
>link to our city's history. It's a wonderful bit of architecture. Doing
>that with a river - even better.
I always enjoy seeing the Tyburn flowing through the basement of Grays,
just south of Oxford Street - right in the middle of touristland but few
people seem to realise that it is there:
http://www.graysantiques.com/tyburn_river.php
--
Paul Terry
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: EricEric Date: Jul 23, 2008 13:32
On 2008-07-22, Tom Anderson wrote:
>
> I was thinking the other day that it would be nice to exhume some of the
> lost rivers. Completely impractical, of course, but nice.
>
> More plausibly, how about making the surface parts of the New River more
> accessible? AFAIK, most of it's fenced off at the moment.
>
> tom
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|