|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: NeillNeill Date: Dec 28, 2007 12:57
It suddenly struck me yesterday when I was up in London, why do TFL
still use the old British Rail logo? Whenever you get to a station
with an overground rail connection, there are signs saying "Trains"
with an arrow and the old logo. In fact I'd also like to what they
think the things that run on the Underground are if not "trains"?
On the southbound Bakerloo platfrom at Waterloo, there's still a sign
that says "British Rail" in blue illuminated glass. Its on both sides
of the sign, so I wonder of this is a deliberate.
Now, If you look at the new "Overground" stickers going up on the
information signs at station, they also have the old BR logo printed
on them.
Why does this still happen?
Neill
|
| |
|
| | 41 Comments |
|
  |
Author: jamessanjamessan Date: Dec 28, 2007 13:09
At the time of privatisation is was decided that the symbol would be
retained to indicate the railway network and that is still the case
today.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Neil WilliamsNeil Williams Date: Dec 28, 2007 13:10
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:57:39 -0800 (PST), Neill
hotmail.com> wrote:
>Why does this still happen?
Because it remains as the logo used to represent mainline rail
throughout the country, and has by no means been retired.
Neil
--
Neil Williams
Put my first name before the at to reply.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Dec 28, 2007 13:23
On 28 Dec, 20:57, Neill hotmail.com> wrote:
> It suddenly struck me yesterday when I was up in London, why do TFL
> still use the old British Rail logo? Whenever you get to a station
> with an overground rail connection, there are signs saying "Trains"
> with an arrow and the old logo.
> On the southbound Bakerloo platfrom at Waterloo, there's still a sign
> that says "British Rail" in blue illuminated glass. Its on both sides
> of the sign, so I wonder of this is a deliberate.
Old Street still has a British Rail (Eastern Region) sign lurking.
U
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Richard J.Richard J. Date: Dec 28, 2007 13:42
Neill wrote:
> It suddenly struck me yesterday when I was up in London, why do TFL
> still use the old British Rail logo?
What makes you think that it's only "up in London" that the National
Rail symbol is used? What part of the country do you come from? Don't
you see it there?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Paul ScottPaul Scott Date: Dec 28, 2007 13:55
> Now, If you look at the new "Overground" stickers going up on the
> information signs at station, they also have the old BR logo printed
> on them.
> Why does this still happen?
Because the 'London Overground' is still part of the current national rail
network, whose sign it is, not the 'tube' despite what you might think if
you listen only to Ken Livingstone?
Paul
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Lew 1Lew 1 Date: Dec 28, 2007 16:36
> It suddenly struck me yesterday when I was up in London, why do TFL
> still use the old British Rail logo? Whenever you get to a station
> with an overground rail connection, there are signs saying "Trains"
> with an arrow and the old logo.
It's *not* an old logo. Every railway station in the country shows that
logo - its accepted as the standard design in the UK meaning "Railway",
regardless of who is running the trains. National Rail still use it, maps
still use it... why would you change it? (Incidentally, what is the name of
this logo, I remember someone telling me once but I have forgotten!)
> In fact I'd also like to what they
> think the things that run on the Underground are if not "trains"?
In non enthusiast speak, they are tubes - even the sub-surface stock. So,
the rail symbol and the word trains quite easily conveys National Trains.
> On the southbound Bakerloo platfrom at Waterloo, there's still a sign
> that says "British Rail" in blue illuminated glass. Its on both sides
> of the sign, so I wonder of this is a deliberate.
|
| Show full article (1.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: chunky munkychunky munky Date: Dec 28, 2007 16:49
On Dec 29, 12:36 am, "Lew 1" REMOVETHISyahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>> It suddenly struck me yesterday when I was up in London, why do TFL
>> still use the old British Rail logo? Whenever you get to a station
>> with an overground rail connection, there are signs saying "Trains"
>> with an arrow and the old logo.
>
> It's *not* an old logo. Every railway station in the country shows that
> logo - its accepted as the standard design in the UK meaning "Railway",
> regardless of who is running the trains. National Rail still use it, maps
> still use it... why would you change it? (Incidentally, what is the name of
> this logo, I remember someone telling me once but I have forgotten!)
>
>> In fact I'd also like to what they
>> think the things that run on the Underground are if not "trains"?
>
> In non enthusiast speak, they are tubes - even the sub-surface stock. So,
> the rail symbol and the word trains quite easily conveys National Trains.
>
>> On the southbound Bakerloo platfrom at Waterloo, there's still a sign ...
|
| Show full article (2.60Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Dec 28, 2007 17:09
On 29 Dec, 00:49, chunky munky hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> London Overground isn't quite like a TOC. It is a concession from TfL.
> A private firm operate it on TfLs behalf. TfL set the timetable, fares
> and staffing levels. They also retain 100%% of the fares.
90%%. And it is a TOC within the National Rail system. The thing it
isn't is a franchise.
> If a LO station only has LO services then it will eventually not have
> the NR Double Arrow logo, there are some expections to this. There is
> more information in the Corporate Design section of the TfL website.
That's not quite right - the North London Railway is a National Rail
service, but the East London Railway is not, probably due to the
project's heritage as a tube line. Stations that are only served by
the East London Railway (which also happen to be the ones owned by TfL
rather than Network Rail) won't have double arrows, but the rest will.
U
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: James FarrarJames Farrar Date: Dec 28, 2007 21:15
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:55:45 -0000, "Paul Scott"
btinternet.com> wrote:
>> Now, If you look at the new "Overground" stickers going up on the
>> information signs at station, they also have the old BR logo printed
>> on them.
>> Why does this still happen?
>
>Because the 'London Overground' is still part of the current national rail
>network, whose sign it is, not the 'tube' despite what you might think if
>you listen only to Ken Livingstone?
Or if you look at Tube line diagrams.
All TOCs are equal, but some TOCs are more equal than others.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|