|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: John RowlandJohn Rowland Date: Dec 10, 2007 07:00
|
| |
|
| | 37 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Tim Roll-PickeringTim Roll-Pickering Date: Dec 10, 2007 07:39
John Rowland wrote:
When is the tube map going to stand still long enough for everyone to have
an up to date copy?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Dec 10, 2007 07:50
On 10 Dec, 15:00, "John Rowland"
journeyflow.spamspam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: StuartStuart Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:20
Tim Roll-Pickering wrote:
> When is the tube map going to stand still long enough for everyone to have
> an up to date copy?
This last few months of 2007 is a busy one in the world of railways
isn't? Train companies finishing, Train companies starting, stations
closing, stations opening.
Got to keep the map makers and train painters in business somehow!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: MIGMIG Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:26
On 10 Dec, 15:50, Mizter T gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 Dec, 15:00, "John Rowland"
>
> journeyflow.spamspam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
That's plausible. The King George V extension opened a day or two
before it officially did.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Abigail BradyAbigail Brady Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:29
On Dec 10, 6:26 pm, MIG doreenbird.co.uk> wrote:
> That's plausible. The King George V extension opened a day or two
> before it officially did.
I was there. It was open.
--
Abi
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:37
On 10 Dec, 18:26, MIG doreenbird.co.uk> wrote:
> On 10 Dec, 15:50, Mizter T gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10 Dec, 15:00, "John Rowland"
>
>> journeyflow.spamspam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> U Thant's blog suggests that it actually opened for business yesterday
>> (sunday):
>
>
> That's plausible. The King George V extension opened a day or two
> before it officially did.
When I said his blog "suggests" it was in operation yesterday that was
really just a turn of phrase as opposed to me casting doubt on the
veracity of what he wrote!
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Paul ScottPaul Scott Date: Dec 10, 2007 10:51
> On 10 Dec, 18:26, MIG doreenbird.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 10 Dec, 15:50, Mizter T gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 Dec, 15:00, "John Rowland"
>>
>>> journeyflow.spamspam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> U Thant's blog suggests that it actually opened for business yesterday
>>> (sunday):
>>
> Just thought it was worth recording for posterity when trains actually
> began stopping at the station. Do the "official opening dates" of
> stations exist merely to confuse people?!
Maybe it costs more to get Ken out of bed on a Sunday?
Paul S
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Dec 10, 2007 11:11
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Stuart wrote:
> Got to keep the map makers and train painters in business somehow!
I noticed a cunning trick yesterday: the strip maps on the Jubilee
(probably other lines too, but i haven't checked) have been updated to
show the Overground interchanges. However, there was a sticker over Canada
Water. Already, i thought? Then i realised - the strip maps will have been
printed not showing ELL interchange at Canada Water, and stickers added to
show it. When the ELL closes, they just pull them off and have a nice neat
strip map that shows the then-current situation. It's also possible that
the underlying map shows Overground interchange at ELL, and the stickers
will be replaced with new stickers that show no interchange for the
duration of the works, which will then be removed when the line reopens.
Incidentally, i noticed the Overground shade of orange seems to be
different to the ELL one. I assumed they'd be the same. Oh well, only
matters for a couple of weeks now!
Someone remind me - why is the ELL closing for three years?
tom
--
Come on thunder; come on thunder.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Dec 10, 2007 11:48
On 10 Dec, 19:11, Tom Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Stuart wrote:
>> Got to keep the map makers and train painters in business somehow!
>
> I noticed a cunning trick yesterday: the strip maps on the Jubilee
> (probably other lines too, but i haven't checked) have been updated to
> show the Overground interchanges. However, there was a sticker over Canada
> Water. Already, i thought? Then i realised - the strip maps will have been
> printed not showing ELL interchange at Canada Water, and stickers added to
> show it. When the ELL closes, they just pull them off and have a nice neat
> strip map that shows the then-current situation. It's also possible that
> the underlying map shows Overground interchange at ELL, and the stickers
> will be replaced with new stickers that show no interchange for the
> duration of the works, which will then be removed when the line reopens.
>
> Incidentally, i noticed the Overground shade of orange seems to be
> different to the ELL one. I assumed they'd be the same. Oh well, only
> matters for a couple of weeks now!
>
> Someone remind me - why is the ELL closing for three years? ...
|
| Show full article (1.94Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|