More Oyster ripoffs
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport.london only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport.london Profile…
 Up
More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: thagor2008
Date: Jul 22, 2008 01:43

I had to take the tube to our london office today. Went down onto the
platform. 1 minute later I realised I'd left something at home and
went out again. Luckily I always check the gates and noticed it had
deducted a quid! So much for the 15 min grace period mentioned on here
by others. The lady in the ticket office was nice enough to put it
back on the card but how many other people have been done by this?
What next , automatic deduction from bluetooth enabled cards as soon
as you walk in the station?? FFS.

B2003
20 Comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: Jim
Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:00

googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:8c97f3f0-55f6-4204-b187-3a0e837d7cf8@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>I had to take the tube to our london office today. Went down onto the
> platform. 1 minute later I realised I'd left something at home and
> went out again. Luckily I always check the gates and noticed it had
> deducted a quid! So much for the 15 min grace period mentioned on here
> by others. The lady in the ticket office was nice enough to put it
> back on the card but how many other people have been done by this?
> What next , automatic deduction from bluetooth enabled cards as soon
> as you walk in the station?? FFS.

Isn't this a generous concession - and far from a rip-off?

Remember what you're doing is getting past the gate line. If you'd been
using paper tickets, the gate would have cancelled the ticket, end of story.
I don't think the nice ticket office lady would have dished out a new ticket
just like that. It's the same everywhere I've been. Once the ticket's been
cancelled at the gateline, tough. There's no need for TFL to give refunds,
but I suppose it's a nice gesture.
Show full article (1.31Kb)
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: Neil Williams
Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:20

Jim wrote:
> Remember what you're doing is getting past the gate line. If you'd been
> using paper tickets, the gate would have cancelled the ticket, end of story.

Or you'd ask to be let out of the manual gate and back in that way
afterwards. I've done it before on the mainline, though admittedly
not on LUL.

Neil
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: thagor2008
Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:34

On Jul 22, 11:00 am, "Jim" blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Isn't this a generous concession - and far from a rip-off?

Whats a concession about it? If I hadn't been looking at the gate I
wouldn't have found out until I tried to go home and found I didn't
have enough money.
> Remember what you're doing is getting past the gate line. If you'd been
> using paper tickets, the gate would have cancelled the ticket, end of story.

No , pre 9.30 return tickets were travelcards , they just cost more.
I'd have gone out through the gate without any problems. Besides , I
think the paper ticket system had a bit more brains that just
swallowing a single or return to a different zone.
> Oyster apparently has the flexibility to allow refunds when it's obvious you
> haven't actually made a journey - another benefit that Oyster provides
> compared with paper tickets!

Allowing is not the same is giving. It should never had deducted the
money in the first place. The onus should not be on the passenger to
be watching the gate and then have to queue up to get a refund when
the gate plainly can tell you only entered 1 minute earlier.

B2003
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: Walter Briscoe
Date: Jul 22, 2008 03:52

In message
<8c97f3f0-55f6-4204-b187-3a0e837d7cf8@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> of
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:43:55 in uk.transport.london,
thagor2008@googlemail.com writes
>I had to take the tube to our london office today. Went down onto the
>platform. 1 minute later I realised I'd left something at home and
>went out again. Luckily I always check the gates and noticed it had
>deducted a quid! So much for the 15 min grace period mentioned on here

I see no reason why Oyster does not use an "odd charge" tone for curious
charges to let the customer know there may be an issue.
>by others. The lady in the ticket office was nice enough to put it
>back on the card but how many other people have been done by this?
>What next , automatic deduction from bluetooth enabled cards as soon
>as you walk in the station?? FFS.

The (undocumented) 15 minute period is that you are charged for an in
zone journey if you enter and leave a station in 15 minutes.
If you enter and leave a station in longer than 15 minutes, you are
charged for an unfinished journey and an unstarted journey.
Show full article (1.42Kb)
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: Roland Perry
Date: Jul 22, 2008 04:04

In message <3VbwwqYyvbhIFwFf@freenetname.co.uk>, at 11:52:34 on Tue, 22
Jul 2008, Walter Briscoe nospam.demon.co.uk> remarked:
>What is the shortest journey between a pair of distinct stations on the
>Underground?

The quickest (between Oyster validators) is probably Northfields to
South Ealing as they are both surface stations. The platform ends are
about 200yds apart.
--
Roland Perry
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: thagor2008
Date: Jul 22, 2008 04:38

On Jul 22, 11:52 am, Walter Briscoe nospam.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
> The (undocumented) 15 minute period is that you are charged for an in
> zone journey if you enter and leave a station in 15 minutes.

How generous of them. Money for old rope is something that sprints to
mind. Fraudulently deducting cash for services not rendered is
another. Unless its considered a platform ticket!

B2003
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: James Farrar
Date: Jul 22, 2008 11:41

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:04:13 +0100, Roland Perry perry.co.uk>
wrote:
>In message <3VbwwqYyvbhIFwFf@freenetname.co.uk>, at 11:52:34 on Tue, 22
>Jul 2008, Walter Briscoe nospam.demon.co.uk> remarked:
>>What is the shortest journey between a pair of distinct stations on the
>>Underground?
>
>The quickest (between Oyster validators) is probably Northfields to
>South Ealing as they are both surface stations. The platform ends are
>about 200yds apart.

Though the exits from the platforms are at opposite ends of the
platforms.
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: MIG
Date: Jul 22, 2008 11:52

On Jul 22, 11:52 am, Walter Briscoe nospam.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
> In message
> <8c97f3f0-55f6-4204-b187-3a0e837d7...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> of
> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:43:55 in uk.transport.london,
> thagor2...@googlemail.com writes
>
>>I had to take the tube to our london office today. Went down onto the
>>platform. 1 minute later I realised I'd left something at home and
>>went out again. Luckily I always check the gates and noticed it had
>>deducted a quid! So much for the 15 min grace period mentioned on here
>
> I see no reason why Oyster does not use an "odd charge" tone for curious
> charges to let the customer know there may be an issue.
>
>>by others. The lady in the ticket office was nice enough to put it
>>back on the card but how many other people have been done by this?
>>What next , automatic deduction from bluetooth enabled cards as soon
>>as you walk in the station?? FFS.
> ...
Show full article (1.81Kb)
no comments
Re: More Oyster ripoffs         


Author: Roland Perry
Date: Jul 22, 2008 14:13

In message 4ax.com>, at 19:41:58 on
Tue, 22 Jul 2008, James Farrar gmail.com> remarked:
>>The quickest (between Oyster validators) is probably Northfields to
>>South Ealing as they are both surface stations. The platform ends are
>>about 200yds apart.
>
>Though the exits from the platforms are at opposite ends of the
>platforms.

I noticed that, but is there a pair of other stations that could be
traversed quicker?
--
Roland Perry
no comments
1 2 3