Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport.london only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport.london Profile…
 Up
Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: johnnyburke02
Date: May 2, 2008 06:40

From eWatford Observer 2/5/08

Golden opportunity missed?

By John Harrison

Environmentalists have condemned the business plan behind the proposed
Croxley Rail Link, warning the county council could miss a "golden
opportunity" to finally get the long-awaited project on track.

Hertfordshire County Council, backed by Mayor Dorothy Thornhill and
Watford MP Claire Ward, presented its business case for the £95m
scheme to the Department for Transport (DfT) in February.

However, the bid was quickly rejected as being "non compliant" with
the Government's funding criteria.

The DfT said the application could not be considered for Government
cash until the flaws in the business plan were resolved.

In a letter sent to the county council the DfT said there was a lack
of evidence to show the East of England Regional Assembly (EERA) - the
project's primary funder - could meet the current cost.

A spokesman for EERA told the Watford Observer this week that the
assembly had promised to invest £50m in the project.
Show full article (3.14Kb)
34 Comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: 1506
Date: May 2, 2008 09:33

On May 2, 6:40 am, johnnyburk...@googlemail.com wrote:
> From eWatford Observer 2/5/08
>
> Golden opportunity missed?
>
> By John Harrison
>
> Environmentalists have condemned the business plan behind the proposed
> Croxley Rail Link, warning the county council could miss a "golden
> opportunity" to finally get the long-awaited project on track.
>
> Hertfordshire County Council, backed by Mayor Dorothy Thornhill and
> Watford MP Claire Ward, presented its business case for the £95m
> scheme to the Department for Transport (DfT) in February.
>
> However, the bid was quickly rejected as being "non compliant" with
> the Government's funding criteria.
>
> The DfT said the application could not be considered for Government
> cash until the flaws in the business plan were resolved. ...
Show full article (3.62Kb)
5 Comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: Zen83237
Date: May 2, 2008 12:13

Quote For the cost of one bridge and a mile or so of new track

Well for
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: Boltar
Date: May 2, 2008 12:37

On 2 May, 17:33, 1506 yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is stupidity gone to seed.

Don't forget that if politicians were actually any good at getting
things done they'd all be in business earning a fortune. They can't ,
so instead they do a job where all they have to do is talk and make
empty promises. This is even more true for that bottom dwelling
species known as local councillers.

B2003
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: 1506
Date: May 2, 2008 12:58

On May 2, 12:13 pm, "Zen83237" zen.co.uk> wrote:
> Quote  For the cost of one bridge and a mile or so of new track
>
> Well for £95m actually which makes it an incredibley expensive bridge and
> mile of track.
>
> Kevin

What WAS that price for a mile of motorway?
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: Mr Thant
Date: May 2, 2008 13:04

On 2 May, 20:13, "Zen83237" zen.co.uk> wrote:
> Well for £95m actually which makes it an incredibley expensive bridge and
> mile of track.

The "one bridge" is a 500 metre viaduct, because joining the two lines
directly isn't possible without a sharp turn and a far bit of
demolition. Plus add two new high-spec stations.

U

--
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/
A blog about transport projects in London
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: Charles Ellson
Date: May 2, 2008 14:10

On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:37:53 -0700 (PDT), Boltar
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>On 2 May, 17:33, 1506 yahoo.com> wrote:
>> This is stupidity gone to seed.
>
>Don't forget that if politicians were actually any good at getting
>things done they'd all be in business earning a fortune.
>
ITYF quite a few of them already are.
>They can't ,
>so instead they do a job where all they have to do is talk and make
>empty promises. This is even more true for that bottom dwelling
>species known as local councillers.
>
>B2003
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: Jack May
Date: May 2, 2008 17:20

"1506" yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bb303802-e0c1-414e-add6-16753adbe4ff@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On May 2, 12:13 pm, "Zen83237" zen.co.uk> wrote:
> Quote For the cost of one bridge and a mile or so of new track
>
> Well for
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: Chris Tolley
Date: May 3, 2008 00:31

Jack May wrote:
> Brits are really pissed with all rail building draining money from roads
> along with causing high congestions and the crumbling of the roads.

When most of Britain's railways were built, crumbled was the natural
state of most of the roads.
--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p13857114.html
(31 138 at Birmingham New Street, Oct 1987)
no comments
Re: Golden opportunity missed? (Croxley Rail Link)         


Author: m1ss_wh1te
Date: May 3, 2008 00:32

On 3 May, 01:20, "Jack May" comcast.net> wrote:

What a load of complete tosh.
no comments
1 2 3 4