|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: AvengerAvenger Date: Jun 25, 2007 00:00
Feminism
Fools and Feminists
Feminism has achieved this for women. Feminism has achieved that for women.
But this is just not true.
Feminism has achieved very little for women. If anything, it has retarded
the progress of women. And, furthermore, it is likely to push back the
'progress' of women in the near future.
Women enjoy greater freedoms today because of progress in the areas of
science, medicine and technology, not because of feminism.
Those who have doubts about this should try to imagine how feminist policies
or attitudes could possibly have succeeded 100 years ago - or in
impoverished places in the world today.
Ask a poor woman in Afghanistan why she still wants to wear the burka when
she walks about in the street. Ask her why she would still much prefer to be
married to a man who has some real concern for her welfare.
Women - feminists or otherwise - have probably always got what they aimed
for throughout History. They were biologically designed to manipulate and to
use men for their own purposes. This is why they survive in so many
circumstances in which men do not.
|
| Show full article (17.17Kb) |
|
| | 9 Comments |
|
|
Author: MasculistMasculist Date: Jun 28, 2007 16:41
pandora wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:30:50 -0700, Masculist wrote:
>
>> On Jun 25, 12:00 am, "Avenger" avengers.co.nl> wrote:>>> Feminism
>>>
>>> Fools and Feminists
>>>
>>> Feminism has achieved this for women. Feminism has achieved that for
>>> women.
>>>
>>> But this is just not true.
>>
>> You bet it's not true Avenger! Feminism was NEVER about improving
>> anyone's lives, it was always about power and greed for selfish women that
>> mostly benefitted rich men to keep us other men down and controlled.
>
> YOu just keep believing that, tommyboi. I'm sure it keeps you warm at
> night.
|
| Show full article (11.63Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: HyerdahlHyerdahl Date: Jun 28, 2007 16:49
On Jun 28, 4:36 pm, pandora peak.org> wrote:> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:30:50 -0700, Masculist wrote:
>> On Jun 25, 12:00 am, "Avenger" avengers.co.nl> wrote:>>> Feminism
>
>>> Fools and Feminists
>
>>> Feminism has achieved this for women. Feminism has achieved that for
>>> women.
>
>>> But this is just not true.
>
>> You bet it's not true Avenger! Feminism was NEVER about improving anyone's lives, it was always about power and greed for selfish women that mostly benefitted rich men to keep us other men down and controlled.
>
> YOu just keep believing that, tommyboi. I'm sure it keeps you warm at> night.
As 'Dolly' says, "cuddle up to your cash register; it's a little
lumpy, but it rings!".
:-)
|
| Show full article (2.25Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: flaviaRflaviaR Date: Jun 28, 2007 20:45
On 28-Jun-2007, pandora peak.org> wrote:
>>> Do you think humans choose mates randomly?
>>
>> The idiotic ones do - PK is actually proof of it.
>
> Actually, I believe that idiots look for and find idiots. That's all that
> will have anything to do with them. Of course, after that, it's all
> random but with only stupid to choose from, what do you expect?
I always figure that stupid people can't help but find
stupid mates, whether they try or not.
Susan
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Binyamin CramerBinyamin Cramer Date: Jun 28, 2007 21:00
verizon.net> wrote in message news:wf%%gi.3586$yp.2944@trnddc08...
>
> On 28-Jun-2007, pandora peak.org> wrote:
>>>>> Do you think humans choose mates randomly?
>>>
>>> The idiotic ones do - PK is actually proof of it.
>>
>> Actually, I believe that idiots look for and find idiots. That's all
>> that
>> will have anything to do with them. Of course, after that, it's all
>> random but with only stupid to choose from, what do you expect?
>
> I always figure that stupid people can't help but find
> stupid mates, whether they try or not.
Yep. Gary / Suzie - Perfectly exemplifies your statement.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Nusrat RizviNusrat Rizvi Date: Jul 6, 2007 05:20
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:04:32 -0700, "connor_a@ hotmail.com"
hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 26, 4:18 am, Nusrat Rizvi optonline.net> wrote:>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:31:31 -0700, PK Smith yahoo.com>>
>>
>> I shudder to think of you as a product of random selection.
>
>With a name like "Nusrat" where do you come from? A rat's ass?
Funny, I have a grandson named Connor but he is only 2 and hence more
mature than you.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: flaviaRflaviaR Date: Jul 8, 2007 01:27
On 6-Jul-2007, Nusrat Rizvi optonline.net> wrote:
> I am also proud of both of my daughters one of them does NY Times
> cross word puzzles in pen, the other speaksEuropean 5 languages.
> Recently I asked, I am making lunch today, you girls want something
> special.
> One said dad, don't call us girls unless you are ready to be called
> boys.
> Why such rank misandry against their own father is beyond me or maybe
> is this considered appropriate behaviour toward men in today's world.
I hope they were joking.
If not, you tell them that one day they will *wish* you were
there to call them "girls" or any other thing you feel like
calling them.
Susan
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: AvengerAvenger Date: Jul 8, 2007 03:09
verizon.net> wrote in message news:Xd1ki.542$YH3.440@trnddc08...
>
> On 6-Jul-2007, Nusrat Rizvi optonline.net> wrote:
>>> I am also proud of both of my daughters one of them does NY Times
>> cross word puzzles in pen, the other speaksEuropean 5 languages.
>> Recently I asked, I am making lunch today, you girls want something
>> special.
>> One said dad, don't call us girls unless you are ready to be called
>> boys.
>> Why such rank misandry against their own father is beyond me or maybe
>> is this considered appropriate behaviour toward men in today's world.
>
> I hope they were joking.
> If not, you tell them that one day they will *wish* you were
> there to call them "girls" or any other thing you feel like
> calling them.
|
| Show full article (0.98Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
