> Boltar wrote:

>> Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
>>

>>> In article

>> <1167761582.761382.306880@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>,

>>> boltar2003@yahoo.co.uk (Boltar) wrote:
>>>

>>>> FCC couldn't run the proverbial piss-up in a brewery without
>>>> the beer being delayed going by what they've done to Thameslink
>>>> and WAGN.

>>>
>>> As a regular user of the former WAGN part of FCC's franchise my
>>> experience since last April is that you are talking through
>>> your rear orifice.

>>
>> Oh look , its you again. Well as a regular user of Thameslink I
>> can say categorically that roughly 80%% of the southbound trains in
>> the morning rush hour are late. Some by more than 15 minutes. This
>> was not the case when the thameslink company ran it. And my last
>> experience of taking the WAGN service from finsbury park 2 months
>> back was not a pleasent one - overcrowded trains and late.

>
> Yup, we in Cambridge were certainly better off with WAGN than with
> First (and I use FGW too, so I can see the signs of the slippery
> slope).