|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Oct 20, 2006 17:31
Morning all,
The discussion of the Northern line got me looking at the Cross-River
Transit proposals again. If this works, i think it'd be excellent, but i
have to admit i'm skeptical about the practicality of an on-street system
along some of London's busiest roads.
But, looking at this map:
http://www.crossriverpartnership.org/downloaddoc.asp?skin=1&page=1236&id=586
I wonder:
Have they got a convincing explanation of how they're going to do this
without getting fouled up in traffic?
Why does the King's Cross branch go the wrong way?
Why does the Brixton branch go via Lambeth North rather than Elephant?
Oh, and what is this 'London University' next to Euston, and isn't Albert
Square on the District line, not down south? :)
tom
--
I have often thought that the questions which we were unable to ask and
the speeches that we never had a chance to deliver were probably the
best ones. -- John Wilkinson, MP, on Parliament
|
| |
|
| | 20 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Tim Roll-PickeringTim Roll-Pickering Date: Oct 20, 2006 18:18
Tom Anderson wrote:
> Oh, and what is this 'London University' next to Euston,
Ack! I've already had to pull one person up this week who should have known
better - they're a graduate of the University of Durham, not Durham
University!
|
| |
|
| | 2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: brixtonitebrixtonite Date: Oct 21, 2006 00:47
>
> I wonder:
>
> Have they got a convincing explanation of how they're going to do this
> without getting fouled up in traffic?
>
> Why does the King's Cross branch go the wrong way?
>
> Why does the Brixton branch go via Lambeth North rather than Elephant?
>
The King's Cross branch arrives from the North in order not to foul up
the Euston Road. IIRC the plans say that the crossing at Euston will
be the only place where trams won't have absolute priority over
traffic, because it would cause mayhem.
As for the Brixton branch, perhaps it will fit in better with the
remodelling of the elephant if this branch doesn't go that way. Or
perhaps it's just because via Lambeth North is the natural route that
the buses to Brixton take at the moment.
|
| Show full article (0.94Kb) |
| 7 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Dave ArquatiDave Arquati Date: Oct 21, 2006 03:53
brixtonite wrote:
>> I wonder:
>>
>> Have they got a convincing explanation of how they're going to do this
>> without getting fouled up in traffic?
Basically, near-absolute priority along the whole route. I don't think
that any section will be shared-use with general traffic at all (much of
it uses existing bus priority routes). AIUI, the only junctions where
the tram will not have priority are Holborn (heavy east-west bus
traffic) and Euston (heavy east-west car traffic). AIUI there are (or at
least were) plans to turn Camden High Street into a public transport
"boulevard", with two-way operation for buses, trams, cycles, possibly
taxis and access only for private vehicles (other private traffic would
be routed via the parallel Camden Street).
|
| Show full article (3.77Kb) |
| 6 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Colin RosenstielColin Rosenstiel Date: Oct 21, 2006 17:58
> At Euston Road in particular, northbound departures from Tavistock
> Square and southbound departures from Euston will be managed
> carefully to fit in with the cycle time of the lights at the
> crossroads. I'm not sure what the cycle time is, but if it were 60
> seconds, then trams would need to hit every other cycle quite
> reliably to maintain the two-minute frequency through the core
> section. This is why I'm somewhat surprised that the alternative
> routing to King's Cross via Judd Street did not last longer in the
> planning stages.
Because Judd St only gets them to St Pancras and not to the Cross?
--
Colin Rosenstiel
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Dave ArquatiDave Arquati Date: Oct 22, 2006 08:28
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
>> At Euston Road in particular, northbound departures from Tavistock
>> Square and southbound departures from Euston will be managed
>> carefully to fit in with the cycle time of the lights at the
>> crossroads. I'm not sure what the cycle time is, but if it were 60
>> seconds, then trams would need to hit every other cycle quite
>> reliably to maintain the two-minute frequency through the core
>> section. This is why I'm somewhat surprised that the alternative
>> routing to King's Cross via Judd Street did not last longer in the
>> planning stages.
>
> Because Judd St only gets them to St Pancras and not to the Cross?
>
Perhaps, but the alternative via Mornington Crescent will take so much
longer that someone taking a tram to Midland Road and walking over to
the Cross would easily beat someone sitting on a tram via St Pancras
Hospital. ...
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Earl PurpleEarl Purple Date: Oct 22, 2006 10:42
Tom Anderson wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> The discussion of the Northern line got me looking at the Cross-River
> Transit proposals again. If this works, i think it'd be excellent, but i
> have to admit i'm skeptical about the practicality of an on-street system
> along some of London's busiest roads.
Push all the traffic off the A4200?
> Why does the King's Cross branch go the wrong way?
You mean why does it follow Crowndale Road and Pancras Road? Because
there's a road there?
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
| 3 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Dave NewtDave Newt Date: Oct 22, 2006 13:28
Tom Anderson wrote:
> Oh, and what is this 'London University' next to Euston
|
| |
| 4 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Oct 22, 2006 15:34
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Earl Purple wrote:
> Tom Anderson wrote:
>
>> Have they got a convincing explanation of how they're going to do this
>> without getting fouled up in traffic?
>
> Push all the traffic off the A4200?
Yes, i imagine so. Where will it go?
>> Why does the King's Cross branch go the wrong way?
>
> You mean why does it follow Crowndale Road and Pancras Road? Because
> there's a road there?
Ah, of course. And there was me thinking that Bernard Street, Judd Street,
Midland Road and Euston Road were roads too. How foolish of me!
>> Why does the Brixton branch go via Lambeth North rather than Elephant?
>
> because it follows the A23? Look at a map to see where the A23 goes
And why does it follow the A23?
Don't say it's because it goes via Lambeth North rather than Elephant!
|
| Show full article (1.10Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Tom AndersonTom Anderson Date: Oct 22, 2006 15:35
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Dave Newt wrote:
> Tom Anderson wrote:
>> Oh, and what is this 'London University' next to Euston
What, all the way from Montague Place to Gower Place? I should think the
denizens of Birkbeck, SOAS, RADA and UCL would have something to say about
that ...
tom
--
3364147 Complete space vehicles (excluding propulsion systems)
|
| |
| 3 Comments |
|
|
|
|