> I am surprised not to see a reference to
> <http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/roadusers/congestioncharging/westernextension/
> default.aspx>
>
> I find it interesting that the census questions do not distinguish
> drivers and non-drivers. They also redundantly ask for a respondent's
> post code and whether the respondent lives in the western extension
> zone.
>
> It looks as if the result will be to modify the implementation.
> I go for that. Although I think the western extension was a bad idea, I
> think scrapping the hardware would be unconscionable.
> --
> Walter Briscoe

>shovelling money into the Venezuelan state oil company

>>shovelling money into the Venezuelan state oil company

>
> Um, that was a Livingstone policy.

>On Sep 2, 5:24 pm, James Farrar gmail.com> wrote:

>>>shovelling money into the Venezuelan state oil company

>>
>> Um, that was a Livingstone policy.

>
>No, that was taking money *from* the Venezuelan state oil company.

> I am surprised not to see a reference to
> <http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/roadusers/congestioncharging/westernextension/
> default.aspx>
>
> I find it interesting that the census questions do not distinguish
> drivers and non-drivers. They also redundantly ask for a respondent's
> post code and whether the respondent lives in the western extension zone.

> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:50:55 -0700 (PDT), John B johnband.org>
> wrote:
>

>> On Sep 2, 5:24 pm, James Farrar gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> shovelling money into the Venezuelan state oil company

>>>
>>> Um, that was a Livingstone policy.

>>
>> No, that was taking money *from* the Venezuelan state oil company.

>
> Didn't it involve buying fuel from them at a reduced price? That's still
> giving our money to them.

>Walter Briscoe wrote:

>> I am surprised not to see a reference to
>><http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/roadusers/congestioncharging/westernextensio>>n/
>> default.aspx>
>> I find it interesting that the census questions do not distinguish
>>drivers and non-drivers. They also redundantly ask for a respondent's
>>post code and whether the respondent lives in the western extension zone.

>
>How did you get it to work? It just says 'invalid email address' when I
>answer the first question (with 2 different browsers).

>
>Did you try a real address?
>I have yet to get an email to ask me to confirm my response is genuine.

> The first question is "Please enter your email address to begin the
> survey:" I filled in my real address and clicked "Next" in IE7. If I
> filled in a@b or news@proof-read.co.uk, I also got "invalid email
> address" but a@b.com worked as does wbriscoe@nospam.demon.co.uk.
> [nospam.demon.co.uk is a black hole real domain provided as a service by
> a demon user.]
>
> Did you try a real address?