Bus hits tree
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport.london only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport.london Profile…
 Up
Bus hits tree         


Author: Boltar
Date: May 20, 2008 04:06

1 dead , 4 serious.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7410203.stm

Didn't side swipe bars get installed on all double deckers at the top
left for just this eventuality?

B2003
35 Comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Neill
Date: May 20, 2008 04:11

On May 20, 12:06 pm, Boltar yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 1 dead , 4 serious.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7410203.stm
>
> Didn't side swipe bars get installed on all double deckers at the top
> left for just this eventuality?
>
> B2003

From the look of it, this one wasn't fitted. You don't see many with
them anyway. It must have been a pretty serious incident for there to
be a death and so many injuries.

Neill
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Adrian
Date: May 20, 2008 04:16

Boltar yahoo.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:
> 1 dead , 4 serious.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7410203.stm
>
> Didn't side swipe bars get installed on all double deckers at the top
> left for just this eventuality?

The pic shows that the roof pillars have bent, and the main roof itself
is damaged. The bars are just to push smaller branches out the way - they
won't protect against a trunk or solid branch strike. The driver's meant
to do that bit.
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Roland Perry
Date: May 20, 2008 04:16

In message
<1b42626f-b875-4a66-8ff6-c5284fb76d8d@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, at
04:11:30 on Tue, 20 May 2008, Neill hotmail.com> remarked:
>> 1 dead , 4 serious.
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7410203.stm
>>
>> Didn't side swipe bars get installed on all double deckers at the top
>> left for just this eventuality?
>>
>> B2003
>
>From the look of it, this one wasn't fitted. You don't see many with
>them anyway. It must have been a pretty serious incident for there to
>be a death and so many injuries.

As it hit a tree (when buses normally pass by unaffected), and killed a
pedestrian, perhaps the bus had mounted the pavement?
--
Roland Perry
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Boltar
Date: May 20, 2008 04:23

On May 20, 12:11 pm, Neill hotmail.com> wrote:
> From the look of it, this one wasn't fitted. You don't see many with
> them anyway. It must have been a pretty serious incident for there to
> be a death and so many injuries.

Yes , does look nasty. I don't know that road but since its central
london you'd think the trees would be regularly trimmed back so buses
don't hit them. Perhaps a branch came down or something. Unless the
driver mounted the pavement of course but it doesn't look like it.

B2003
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Adrian
Date: May 20, 2008 04:25

Roland Perry perry.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying:
>>From the look of it, this one wasn't fitted. You don't see many with
>>them anyway. It must have been a pretty serious incident for there to be
>>a death and so many injuries.
> As it hit a tree (when buses normally pass by unaffected), and killed a
> pedestrian, perhaps the bus had mounted the pavement?

Do you know whether the bus actually hit the pedestrian? Or was she
killed by falling glass?
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Ernst S Blofeld
Date: May 20, 2008 04:36

Adrian wrote:
> The pic shows that the roof pillars have bent, and the main roof itself
> is damaged. The bars are just to push smaller branches out the way - they
> won't protect against a trunk or solid branch strike. The driver's meant
> to do that bit.

There's a better(*) pic here;

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=148564&in_page_id=34

(*) At time of writing (the BBC article is subject to updates).

ESB
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Boltar
Date: May 20, 2008 04:44

On May 20, 12:36 pm, Ernst S Blofeld new-spectre-base.com>
wrote:
> Adrian wrote:
>> The pic shows that the roof pillars have bent, and the main roof itself
>> is damaged. The bars are just to push smaller branches out the way - they
>> won't protect against a trunk or solid branch strike. The driver's meant
>> to do that bit.
>
> There's a better(*) pic here;
>
> http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=148564&in_page...
>
> (*) At time of writing (the BBC article is subject to updates).

Thats a large chunk of tree. You'd think the driver could hardly fail
to spot it in the way though they seem not to spot low bridges either
so who knows. I wonder if the bus was on diversion.

B2003
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Neill
Date: May 20, 2008 04:51

On May 20, 12:44 pm, Boltar yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On May 20, 12:36 pm, Ernst S Blofeld new-spectre-base.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Adrian wrote:
>>> The pic shows that the roof pillars have bent, and the main roof itself
>>> is damaged. The bars are just to push smaller branches out the way - they
>>> won't protect against a trunk or solid branch strike. The driver's meant
>>> to do that bit.
>
>> There's a better(*) pic here;
>
>
>> (*) At time of writing (the BBC article is subject to updates).
>
> Thats a large chunk of tree. You'd think the driver could hardly fail
> to spot it in the way though they seem not to spot low bridges either
> so who knows. I wonder if the bus was on diversion.
> ...
Show full article (1.04Kb)
no comments
Re: Bus hits tree         


Author: Boltar
Date: May 20, 2008 05:36

On May 20, 12:51 pm, Neill hotmail.com> wrote:
> Don't think it was on diversion. One branch is down and it loks like
> another is hanging off. That's a tremedous amount of damage caused by
> a branch of even a fullt grown plane tree. What speed was it going at
> the time?

The tree? Not very fast I suspect. Though possibly the bus driver
missed a "plant crossing" sign further back up the road :)

B2003
no comments
1 2 3 4