Guy at Waterloo attacked for taking pictures

There's a photograph of the attacker in the post and police are
looking for people who can help identify him.

http://london-underground.blogspot.com/2008/02/police-seeking-tube-photographer....

"somersetchris" kuching.co.uk> wrote in message
news:90434a10-b7f4-4e48-a57c-9af2fa887cd4@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Now that is man who did not like a camera, look at those eyes, genuine fear.

On Feb 21, 7:37 pm, somersetchris kuching.co.uk> wrote:

Pretty dubious reason for taking pictures though the photographer
sounds like a complete t**t.

On 21 Feb, 20:03, allan tracy hotmail.com> wrote:

But is that an excuse for violence? I believe that there is never an
excuse for violence.

Of course not but there can be no doubt that his activity was bound to
lead to some tube passengers becoming upset.

It was a good job he wasn't aiming his camera at young children or
specifically at women as he may well have found himself the subject of
a wholly different type of police investigation (if the tube
passengers hadn't got to him first).

In message
<6e37bbbc-03df-4132-8198-c24adec3913b@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com>,
allan tracy hotmail.com> writes

I doubt it as neither of those activities is illegal, as has been
debated here many times. Inadvisable maybe, for reasons that have now
happened; but not illegal. Even if the police had been "interested" ...

On Feb 21, 10:12 pm, Ian Jelf bluebadge.demon.co.uk> wrote:

On Feb 21, 7:37 pm, somersetchris kuching.co.uk> wrote:

That site says this:
"A man taking some photographs of people on the London Underground was
attacked and hopefully the picture that he took of his attacker can
lead to their arrest..."

Why "their" arrest? How many people were there?

Offramp wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

ESB

On Feb 22, 1:16 am, Ernst S Blofeld new-spectre-base.com>
wrote:

The picture at the site looks like a man, and the police are looking
for a man, so why the political correctness? Why not say, "his arrest"?