Bridge joints
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport.london only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport.london Profile…
 Up
Bridge joints         


Author: John Rowland
Date: Jul 29, 2008 05:40

I don't know the correct terminology, but I'm talking about the 2 rubber
strips across the entire road width which you get on either side of a road
bridge.

I notice that one of the bridge joints in Primrose Street has been covered
by the new bricked road surface... Is this a cock up, or are bridge joints
not really necessary?
2 Comments
Re: Bridge joints         


Author: J. Chisholm
Date: Jul 29, 2008 09:06

John Rowland wrote:
> I don't know the correct terminology, but I'm talking about the 2 rubber
> strips across the entire road width which you get on either side of a road
> bridge.
>
Expansion Joints (buffer space to take up expasion of beams on hot days)
> I notice that one of the bridge joints in Primrose Street has been covered
> by the new bricked road surface... Is this a cock up, or are bridge joints
> not really necessary?
>
If they are just short beams, I'd expect that the 'bricks'would adapt to
fill the space, and voids when cold would not be noticed. (I wonder what
sort of joint is beneath the bricks?)
If this were a 500m beam, I don't think it would be a good solution.

Jim Chisholm
no comments
Re: Bridge joints         


Author: John Rowland
Date: Jul 30, 2008 04:45

J. Chisholm wrote:
> John Rowland wrote:
>> I don't know the correct terminology, but I'm talking about the 2
>> rubber strips across the entire road width which you get on either
>> side of a road bridge.
>>
> Expansion Joints (buffer space to take up expasion of beams on hot
> days)

I learnt something! I thought they were to stop bridges collapsing in an
earthquake.
>> I notice that one of the bridge joints in Primrose Street has been
>> covered by the new bricked road surface... Is this a cock up, or are
>> bridge joints not really necessary?
>>
> If they are just short beams, I'd expect that the 'bricks'would adapt
> to fill the space, and voids when cold would not be noticed. (I
> wonder what sort of joint is beneath the bricks?)
> If this were a 500m beam, I don't think it would be a good solution.

Thanks.
no comments