|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: ChrisChris Date: Jun 2, 2008 09:48
|
| |
|
| | 23 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:07
On 2 Jun, 17:48, Chris btinternet.com> wrote:
Fantastic, that's great news. I was waiting for the latest on this -
the London Assembly Transport Committee held an extraordinary meeting
this morning on this issue. Mr Cooke's completely inexcusable partisan
behaviour during the election campaign was a total disgrace.
The background to this can be found on the Committee's agenda papers
for today's meeting - in particular the the statement he released
offering support for Mr Johnson can be read in Appendix B here (PDF):
http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/transport/2008/jun02/item06.pdf
His fig leaf of issuing said statement in a 'personal capacity' was
just that - he is supposed to be an independent impartial ombudsman,
and his actions completely invalidated that.
This will be a salutary lesson in how not to do things. What an
utterly stupid way to get the sack.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Paul ScottPaul Scott Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:15
>
> On 2 Jun, 17:48, Chris btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>
> Fantastic, that's great news. I was waiting for the latest on this -
> the London Assembly Transport Committee held an extraordinary meeting
> this morning on this issue. Mr Cooke's completely inexcusable partisan
> behaviour during the election campaign was a total disgrace.
>
> The background to this can be found on the Committee's agenda papers
> for today's meeting - in particular the the statement he released
> offering support for Mr Johnson can be read in Appendix B here (PDF):
> http://www.london.gov.uk/assembly/transport/2008/jun02/item06.pdf
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.57Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mr ThantMr Thant Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:35
On 2 Jun, 18:15, "Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote:
> Not being a reader of the Standard and the various freesheets found in
> London, was there much/any coverage of his comments at the time?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: RobWiltonRobWilton Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:40
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Serves the fat drunken grovelling bastard right he will have to get a proper
job now,I hear that there's a job going up at Transport for London as a
shit shovellers assistant there's also a job as a pox doctors clerk but you
have to be able to read & write to qualify
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Serves the fat drunken grovelling bastard right he will have to get a proper
job now,I hear that there's a job going up at Transport for London as a
shit shovellers assistant there's also a job as a pox doctors clerk but you
have to be able to read & write to qualify.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Paul ScottPaul Scott Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:49
> On 2 Jun, 18:15, "Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote:
>> Not being a reader of the Standard and the various freesheets found in
>> London, was there much/any coverage of his comments at the time?
Takes up a lot of room doesn't he - I hope he pays for three tickets when he
uses 3+2 seating as pictured!
Paul S
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: James FarrarJames Farrar Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:51
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:48:16 -0700 (PDT), Chris
btinternet.com> wrote:
Muppet. Exactly what he deserved.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tom BarryTom Barry Date: Jun 2, 2008 10:56
Mr Thant wrote:
> On 2 Jun, 18:15, "Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote:
>> Not being a reader of the Standard and the various freesheets found in
>> London, was there much/any coverage of his comments at the time?
'Brian Who', one suspects. It was always possible that this was a
long-term play for a position higher up in the Boris team, but I can't
see that happening now, regardless of the fact that the three Tory
members who turned up (if the fourth Tory member had appeared the
decision would have been split 4-4 with one abstention) gave Mr. Cooke
an extremely benevolent reading of the situation ('a technical breach',
one called it, and another talked about a 'witch hunt').
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mizter TMizter T Date: Jun 2, 2008 11:17
On 2 Jun, 18:35, Mr Thant googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On 2 Jun, 18:15, "Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>> Not being a reader of the Standard and the various freesheets found in
>> London, was there much/any coverage of his comments at the time?
Indeed - especially as Brian Cooke's pre-election statement was
actually released *through* Boris Johnson's campaign.
See this MayorWatch piece:
http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/article_id-1583.html
It would appear that BoJo's campaign team realised this might not be
right, as they apparently removed it from the official backboris.com
website later that day according to a blog entry on the Livingstone
campaign website which (for the record) said this:
|
| Show full article (2.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Paul CorfieldPaul Corfield Date: Jun 2, 2008 12:31
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:07:50 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>On 2 Jun, 17:48, Chris btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>
>Fantastic, that's great news. I was waiting for the latest on this -
>the London Assembly Transport Committee held an extraordinary meeting
>this morning on this issue. Mr Cooke's completely inexcusable partisan
>behaviour during the election campaign was a total disgrace.
I agree that it's the right decision. His comments were completely
inappropriate for someone in his position and given the well understood
and publicised rules governing the Mayoral elections and "purdah".
|
| Show full article (1.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|