Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport.london only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.transport.london Profile…
 Up
Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: mike.j.harvey
Date: Jan 13, 2007 03:10

Two young boys have been hit and killed by a London Underground (LU)
train in Barking in east London.

British Transport Police (BTP) said they were part of a group of four
boys who had been writing graffiti in a depot late on Friday night.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6258337.stm
51 Comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: Jonathan Morris
Date: Jan 13, 2007 04:55

Boltar wrote:
> Good. They weren't young boys , they were in their twenties and were
> vandalising a train. I'd call that a result.

You know you're going to get the do-gooders coming on saying "But these
poor kids have a family.. they didn't deserve to die.. would you
suggest killing someone for stealing a chocolate bar in a corner shop"
etc, don't you?

It's clear that these people knew what they were doing. I was in
America last week and there was an accident where two 17 year olds were
killed on motorcycles, having been drinking and street racing. I was
quite surprised to see that the media and even friends blamed them for
their stupidity. Rather than saying 'Poor lads' or 'it was a tragic
accident' or blamed someone else (the bike manufacturers or something),
they were quite clear - a stupid 'accident' that wouldn't have happened
if they hadn't been idiots.
Show full article (1.40Kb)
1 Comment
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: Jonathan Morris
Date: Jan 13, 2007 05:01

Jonathan Morris wrote:
> All in all, it seems like rather effective crime prevention. Two people
> who won't be out tonight damaging property.

I am going to add that I feel for the driver, and possibly the security
staff if they witnessed the collision. These are the people we SHOULD
be feeling sympathy for.

Jonathan
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: John B
Date: Jan 13, 2007 05:07

Jonathan Morris wrote:
> Perhaps it's time we started to think the same way about these things
> (it doesn't mean you don't have sympathy for the family, especially if
> they didn't know what their kids were doing). You just know that over
> here, there will be an inquiry and a family will possibly end up suing,
> and winning, compensation from LUL, the driver or maybe the security
> guard/s for scaring them and making them panic...

You think that the UK is *more* nannyish and litigious than the US?
That's an impressive disconnect from reality.

In real life, there will not be an enquiry, nobody will sue anyone and
no compensation will be awarded - I'd happily bet
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: mike.j.harvey
Date: Jan 13, 2007 05:23

John Rowland wrote:
> I suspect that drivers who hit graffitijits feels fine, unlike drivers who
> hit suicides or fallers.

Don't talk like a c**t. I wouldn't "feel fine" if I saw somebody's
brains all over the coupler, half of them in the four foot and half in
the cess, their lungs and guts draped over the shoe beam, still less if
i had to bag said items up.

Having said that, it was their own fault. Trespassing on LUL has to be
a fairly good way of getting a Darwin award - twice as many juice rails
as the Southern, where I grew up.
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: tkd
Date: Jan 13, 2007 05:31

gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1168686617.671703.55530@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Two young boys have been hit and killed by a London Underground (LU)
> train in Barking in east London.
>
> British Transport Police (BTP) said they were part of a group of four
> boys who had been writing graffiti in a depot late on Friday night.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6258337.stm
>

What kind of people, in their early twenties, spend a Friday night spraying
paint on Underground trains in sidings and whilst services are still
running? If it were teenagers you could put it down to youthful
recklessness, but people aged 21 and 23? They can vote, work and pay taxes
and (theoretically) have completed a university education. It is sad that
there are people like these that have clearly been left behind by society.
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: bowroaduk
Date: Jan 13, 2007 05:39

>
> That is quite different: by drinking and street racing, they were risking
> others, whereas the graffiti artists weren't endangering anyone's life.

Graffiti artists (sic) have proven track records (no pun) of covering
speed restriction signs, signals, OPO CCTV or mirrors and train
head/tail-lights, cut holes in depot fencing which could allow access
for small children, all of which could impact on safety. And if we
really need contrasting door and body colours on UK trains under DiPTAC
(which I do doubt) then are even causing difficulties for the partially
sighted too.

These two are no loss to society and it's just a pity so many
passengers are staff were inconvenienced last night and today. Good
riddance though I expect they're already being hailed as martyrs on
taggers' message boards.
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: John B
Date: Jan 13, 2007 06:40

Trixie wrote:
[quoting fixed - JB]
>> The only exception is if they are injured by a criminal or criminally
>> negligent act committed by someone else - and, because you're always
>> allowed to use reasonable force to stop people from committing crimes,
>> this rarely happens. You'd need to (e.g., props to Mr Martin, etc.)
>> shoot a fleeing child in the back for it to be treated as anything
>> other than reasonable self defence.
>
> What child ?

In law, a 16-year-old is a child. If you don't like that, why not stand
for Parliament and try and get it changed?
> Tony Martin is a hero who killed a pikey scumbag in the dark and who
> shouldn't have been on his property.

Tony Martin is a sad, deluded, slighly mad person. A court of law found
that, beyond reasonable doubt, he knowingly shot a fleeing child in the
back. He was eventually acquitted of murder on the grounds of
diminished responsibility. And who cares about the ethnic origin of the
child he killed? (well, racists might, I suppose).
Show full article (2.04Kb)
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: John B
Date: Jan 13, 2007 07:26

John Rowland wrote:
>>> Tony Martin is a hero who killed a pikey scumbag in
>>> the dark and who shouldn't have been on his property.
>>
>> And who cares about the ethnic
>> origin of the child he killed? (well, racists might, I suppose).
>
> Is pikey a race? I thought it was a behaviour pattern.

The primary meaning of "pikey" is "Irish traveller", although it is
also used to mean "general scumbag".

Since Fred Barras was from an Irish traveller family, I rather assumed
that the OP was using the term in that sense...

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org
no comments
Re: Boys killed by Underground train after spraying graffiti         


Author: Jonathan Morris
Date: Jan 13, 2007 07:52

John B wrote:
> You think that the UK is *more* nannyish and litigious than the US?
> That's an impressive disconnect from reality.

Well, that's what I thought too. Maybe they're gaining a sense of
reality?
> In real life, there will not be an enquiry, nobody will sue anyone and
> no compensation will be awarded - I'd happily bet £500 on that, if
> anyone's up for it.

An interview on Sky News had a police officer saying they were
convinced there was no chase going on, suggesting people are already
beginning to question whether the security guards might have 'caused'
the incident.

My comments were of course not just about this once incident.

Jonathan
2 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6