|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Paul ScottPaul Scott Date: Aug 6, 2008 11:20
"One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly
three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and
tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line
Thameslink."
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/article4467645...
March 2009 until late 2011.
"Yesterday's announcement prompted concerns about commuter disruption, with
the nearest Tube stations ten minutes' walk away. There were also fears of
delays to the planned works because Network Rail has been criticised for
presiding over several project overruns."
Nice to see the Times taking the pessimist view...
"Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service
development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station is
part of Network Rail works. Once the works are complete, customers will get
a new upgraded station with step-free access, increased capacity and better
interchange facilities between the Tube and national rail services."
|
| Show full article (1.53Kb) |
|
| | 27 Comments |
|
  |
Author: hounslow3hounslow3 Date: Aug 6, 2008 11:42
"Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:zbmdnYbfhq8WdgTVnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
> "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly
> three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and
> tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line
> Thameslink."
>
> http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/article4467645...
>
> March 2009 until late 2011.
>
> "Yesterday's announcement prompted concerns about commuter disruption,
> with the nearest Tube stations ten minutes' walk away. There were also
> fears of delays to the planned works because Network Rail has been
> criticised for presiding over several project overruns."
>
> Nice to see the Times taking the pessimist view...
>
> "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service
> development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station ...
|
| Show full article (1.74Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tim Roll-PickeringTim Roll-Pickering Date: Aug 6, 2008 12:57
Paul Scott wrote:
> "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly
> three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and
> tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line
> Thameslink."
Blackfriars is the station closest to my old school (City of London) and if
it had been closed when I went there I would have been almost permanently
late in the mornings and in the afternoons the combined effect of getting to
the nearest station (Temple?) and the mainline timetable would have almost
doubled my journey home. Nice!
> "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service
> development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station
> is part of Network Rail works. Once the works are complete, customers will
> get a new upgraded station with step-free access, increased capacity and
> better interchange facilities between the Tube and national rail
> services."
Oh yes, I've had *so* many problems interchanging with the current set-up at
Blackfriars!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Philip HardyPhilip Hardy Date: Aug 6, 2008 13:25
> How long was T4 out of service, until late 2006?
BAA never took the T4 out of service while the underground station was
upgraded ;-)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: Aug 6, 2008 13:50
"Paul Scott" btinternet.com> wrote in
news:zbmdnYbfhq8WdgTVnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com:
> "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly
> three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and
> tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line
> Thameslink."
The network rail media centre has a lovely image of the new South Bank
entrance at Blackfrairs (click on the image for a hi-res version). Not
only is the signage to the London Underground corporate image (I assume the
tube is staying on the North bank) but it is clearly a 4-VEP leaving the
new station ....
http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=3854
&NewsAreaID=2&SearchCategoryID=2
David
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: Aug 6, 2008 13:52
In message eclipse.net.uk>, Philip
Hardy phardy.karoo.co.uk> writes
>> How long was T4 out of service, until late 2006?
>
>BAA never took the T4 out of service while the underground station was
>upgraded ;-)
In reality, very little work was done to the T4 station other than a bit
of a deep clean.
The work was to create the junction for the T5 line and trains couldn't
run
through T4 whilst this was happening, it was not to upgrade T4.
--
Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building.
You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK
(please use the reply to address for email)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: darkprince66darkprince66 Date: Aug 6, 2008 14:55
On Aug 6, 7:20Â pm, "Paul Scott" btinternet.com>
wrote:
> "One of the capital's busiest Underground stations is to shut for nearly
> three years. Blackfriars station, used by about 44,000 City workers and
> tourists every day, will close for works to upgrade the main line
> Thameslink."
>
> http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/trans...
>
> March 2009 until late 2011.
>
> "Yesterday's announcement prompted concerns about commuter disruption, with
> the nearest Tube stations ten minutes' walk away. There were also fears of
> delays to the planned works because Network Rail has been criticised for
> presiding over several project overruns."
>
> Nice to see the Times taking the pessimist view...
>
> "Richard Parry, London Underground's director of strategy and service
> development, said: "The redevelopment of Blackfriars Underground station is ...
|
| Show full article (1.70Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: fjmd1afjmd1a Date: Aug 6, 2008 17:48
On 6 Aug, 22:55, darkprince66 yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> 10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You
> poor darlings ;-)
I know, that was my reaction. If we weren't spoiled we wouldn't be so
worried. Chancery Lane, Holborn etc aren't far. By the standards of
many towns and cities, Waterloo isn't far.
Francis
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: jdfijdfi Date: Aug 6, 2008 23:39
On Aug 7, 1:48 am, "fjm...@ gmail.com" gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 Aug, 22:55, darkprince66 yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>> 10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You
>> poor darlings ;-)
>
> I know, that was my reaction. If we weren't spoiled we wouldn't be so
> worried. Chancery Lane, Holborn etc aren't far. By the standards of
> many towns and cities, Waterloo isn't far.
>
> Francis
True, but it still makes you wonder how _necessary_ the closure really
is. As far as I recall, the works are to extend the platforms (to the
south bank) and create four through ones instead of two through and
three bays - I'm sure someone _could_ work out a way to do this
leaving one platform open each time (even if Northbound only or
whatever).
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Peter MassonPeter Masson Date: Aug 7, 2008 00:09
> On Aug 7, 1:48 am, "fjm...@ gmail.com" gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 Aug, 22:55, darkprince66 yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> 10 minutes walk? To the nearest tube station? Gasps in horror... You
>>> poor darlings ;-)
>>
>> I know, that was my reaction. If we weren't spoiled we wouldn't be so
>> worried. Chancery Lane, Holborn etc aren't far. By the standards of
>> many towns and cities, Waterloo isn't far.
>>
>> Francis
>
> True, but it still makes you wonder how _necessary_ the closure really
> is. As far as I recall, the works are to extend the platforms (to the
> south bank) and create four through ones instead of two through and
> three bays - I'm sure someone _could_ work out a way to do this ...
|
| Show full article (1.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|