| Re: BBC funds graffiti criminal |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport.london · Group Profile
Author: Light of AriaLight of Aria Date: Sep 18, 2008 03:34
"Carl Waring" carlDASHwaring.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2zoAk.4712$Ax1.410@newsfe12.ams2...> Light of Aria wrote:
>> There are certain places where I have a great big problem with
>> adverts: Springs to mind, the top of peoples' heads, scenery, drama
>> and films, documentaries, scientific or artistic material, the
>> countryside, public open spaces, public squares, the central action
>> on sporting events, news bulletins, etc.
>
> Ahh. So you /were/ talking about DOGs, etc. and not bill-boards. Glad we
> cleared that up at least.
>
DOGs, shout overs, billboards = grafitti and shit to me.
There is no difference to tagging a wall or park bench to tagging my TV
picture as far as I'm concernced, nor for that matter shouting over music.
They are anti-social, undesirable, "sinful" and immorale activities.
I accordingly regard The BBC as an organisation that is full of the immorale
and inferior.
>> me more hostile to the BBC than irony of ironies commercial
>> television.
>
> Yeah, 'cos commercial channels /never/ do that, do they? :-(
>
>
> --
I am under no obligation to be a viewer of commercial channels nor do they
leach my own money.
I have no "commercial" or financial relationship with these people, thank
you.
| 
