| Re: BBC funds graffiti criminal |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: uk.transport.london · Group Profile
Author: Carl WaringCarl Waring Date: Sep 17, 2008 07:33
"Light of Aria" no.valid.domain.com> wrote in message
news:gaqbl3$488$1@energise.enta.net...
>
> "Carl Waring" carlDASHwaring.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:vi2Ak.62272$Fa6.13507@newsfe25.ams2...
>> "Carl Waring" carlDASHwaring.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:D52Ak.62270$Fa6.26993@newsfe25.ams2...
>>> "Light of Aria" no.valid.domain.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gao4hc$2h4r$1@energise.enta.net...
>>>> The BBC have been instrumental in encouraging and promoting graffiti
>>>> for 10 years now.
>>>
>>> I'm sure that you will be able to back-up this claim with facts and also
>>> cite credible sources for your statement.
>>>
>>> Or not, as the case may be.
>>
>> Oh, hang on. I /was/ thinking that you might actually be moaning about
>> the BBC's (and every other broadcasters) use of DOGs but I've just
>> noticed the other group you x-posted this to.
>>
>> I assume that you must be on about the advertising of it's programming
>> that the BBC (and every other broadcaster) does around London, etc.
>>
>> If so, what's the bloody problem? Are you exceptionally stupid or
>> something?
>>
>> --
>> Carl Waring
>> DigiGuide:
>> Full: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=1&r=1495
>> Web-based: http://getdigiguide.com/?p=3&r=1495
>>
>
>
>
> What you call advertising, is what I regard as graffiti and vandalism.
So, to you, any billboard is graffiti and vandalism; or just the
BBC-specific ones?
A very odd POV in either case.
|