> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:33:25 +0100, "Paul" nospam.eclipse.co.uk>
> wrote:
>

>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7528342.stm

>

>>I keep forgetting to check when I'm up at Euston, but am I right in thinking
>>the arch would not have been in the way of the 1960s development anyway?

>
> I was told that it was located such that the extension of several
> platforms would not have been feasible had it remained.
>
> The real blight on Euston is the tower block right in front of it,
> anyway.  The rest of the station is fine given the tweaks that will be
> done to it, e.g. the removal of all the retail units from the
> concourse.
>
> Neil
> ...

>Am I right in thinking that the tower is a more recent addition. Some
>how I recall it dating from the '70s, or '80s.

> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:03:27 -0700 (PDT), 1506
>
> yahoo.com> wrote:

>>Am I right in thinking that the tower is a more recent addition.  Some
>>how I recall it dating from the '70s, or '80s.

>
> Could well be - but Euston, and particularly the bus station, would be
> far nicer if it was open to the park and the road.
>
> Neil
>