uk.sport.motorsport.formula1
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.sport.motorsport.formula1 only
 
Advanced search
October 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
      1 39
2345678 40
9101112131415 41
16171819202122 42
23242526272829 43
3031      44
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
uk.sport.motorsport.formula1 Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: If I was cynical....         


Author: 86212
Date: Oct 11, 2006 12:36

"Paolo" d.co> wrote in message >
> I'm expecting on the FIA to give Alonso a newly made up penalty and
> put him to the back of the grid so their boy can be crowned.

Yes. I agree. This is what will happen. He'll get dropped ten places because his favourite Spice
Girl is 'Sporty' whereas the FIA's is clearly Posh.
no comments
  Re: BBC tv/radio/interactive coverage of Ashes         


Author: John Briggs
Date: Oct 11, 2006 04:51

Brian Lawrence wrote:
> "Brian Lawrence" msn.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, wrong group. Possibly still of interest to some :-)

Ah, but it does give some insight into your interest in F1 statistics -
although quite how a cricket scorer copes with the pace of F1 is a bit of a
mystery :-)

You are probably the only person who understood what was going on at Brazil
2003, when the result was decided by Duckworth-Lewis...
--
John Briggs
1 Comment
  Re: If I was cynical....         


Author: 86212
Date: Oct 9, 2006 14:53

I realised that after I'd posted. Consider your stolen thunder returned ;-)

"Nico Bartels" wrote in message
news:1mvki216hb2hv4f2rav8aovdjqc7akr9i9@nbartels.net...
> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:14:05 GMT, "86212" <86212@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>.... I'd probably expect Massa to drive Alonso off the road in Brazil....
>>....if I was cynical.
>
> I was: Message-ID: <5atji2d93mj2scsn6utf55q2v0c3hvut8f@nbartels.net>
>
> --
> |\ |
> | \|ico
>
> Panic now and avoid the rush!
no comments
  Re: Alonso's engine for Brazil         


Author: Paul Giverin
Date: Oct 9, 2006 13:19

In message <4ovltbFgj0qtU1@individual.net>, Brian Lawrence
msn.com> writes
>"Paul Giverin" giverin.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Would anyone bet against Alonso taking the 10 place hit on the grid
>>and slotting in a new engine
>> for Brazil? Just one point will do so he might want to make sure the
>>engine won't let him down.
>
>He's due a new engine anyway. The one he had in Japan was new for Shanghai.
>
>
Sorry, I was thinking that his blow up was in Shanghai but of course it
was at Monza. I must keep off the Merlot before posting :)

--
Paul Giverin

British Jet Engine Website http://www.britjet.co.uk
no comments
  Timescale         


Author: ian field
Date: Oct 5, 2006 14:21

How long ago was the motorcycle invented?
no comments
  Engine Usage After 16 Events         


Author: Brian Lawrence
Date: Oct 3, 2006 06:33

E# - Number of engines used by driver/team/engine supplier in first 16 GPs
Km. - Distance covered in practice/qualifying/race in the first 16 GPs
Avg. - Average distance per engine after first 16 GPs

Averages in [] indicate that the driver/team/engine supplier is in the middle
of a two-race cycle.

C# Driver(s) Engine E# Km. Avg.
==========================================================
21 Scott Speed Cosworth TJ2005-2 8 8,070 1,009 New engine next GP [** V10 **]
16 Nick Heidfeld BMW P86 8 7,572 947 New engine next GP
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 Fernando Alonso Renault RS26 9 8,722 [969]
2 G Fisichella Renault RS26 9 8,363 [929]
11 Rubens Barrichello Honda RA806E 9 8,361 929 New engine next GP
14 David Coulthard Ferrari 056 9 7,583 843 New engine next GP
18 Tiago Monteiro Toyota RVX-06 9 7,527 836 New engine next GP [** V10 **]
4 Montoya/de la Rosa Mercedes FO108S 9 6,991 [777]
3 Kimi R
no comments
  Overtaking Statistics #16 - Shanghai (Note: equals "record")         


Author: Brian Lawrence
Date: Oct 3, 2006 02:13

Introduction for New Readers
============================

I have posted these amateur analyses for several years now, in an attempt
to allow comparisons between Grands Prix, seasons, circuits, drivers, etc.

In order to make any meaningful observations it is essential to produce
these stats in as consistent a way as possible. To do this I have made
several "rules" that I try to follow for each race. Please note before
posting to complain that I missed an obvious passing manoeuvre that it
probably has been excluded because of my "rules". The rules are outlined
in the "Disclaimer" below - please read it.

This analysis was mainly derived from the official FIA lap chart, which is
usually available from www.fia.com, www.forix.com or www.autosport.com/f1/
on race day or the following day. The original chart remains copyright of the
FIA. Other excellent Formula One websites are available. This analysis is
completely unofficial.

Disclaimer
==========

For the purposes of this analysis, I only count what I will call "genuine"
passing manoeuvres, which means that I exclude:
Show full article (2.65Kb)
no comments
  Joint WDC leaders         


Author: Brian Lawrence
Date: Oct 2, 2006 03:54

>> By my reckoning this is the 32nd time that there have been joint leaders in
>> the WDC table, but only the third time that it has happened with just two
>> races left.
>>
>> The previous occasions were
>>
>> 1968 Graham Hill/Denny Hulme 33 points each
>>
>> Hill had led the table from round two. He finished second and first in the
>> two remaining races, while Hulme retired from both.
>>
>> 1998 Mika/MS 80 points each
>>
>> H
no comments
  Re: 2006 - 16 - CHN - Practice 1         


Author: Brian Lawrence
Date: Oct 2, 2006 02:47

"Flapstra" hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Brian, Are you married and do you have a job??

Yes, for more than 30 years. I no longer have a job, but I worked
in IT for more than 25 years.
no comments
  Re: I think...         


Author: Blast Off!2
Date: Oct 1, 2006 20:07

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:09:44 GMT, Dave Ryman
hotmail.com> wrote:
>"John Briggs" ntlworld.com> wrote in news:dqZTg.46022
>$SH2.1127@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net:
>
>> Dave Ryman wrote:
>>> ... that was probably the best race for a very very very long time.
>>>...
Show full article (1.50Kb)
no comments
1 2