> Ian wrote:

>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> You do have a killfile, you just choose not to use it.
>>
>> Happy New Year,
>>
>> Ian

>
> Okay, fair enough, I do have the facility to censor who I see messages
> from; when I said I don't have a kill file I meant I don't have anybody
> listed in such a file/folder or wherever this mysterious machine keeps
> such things.
> I have actually just got hold of a mac and am converting to that - seems
> infinitely more user friendly to a non-techy like me than the old windows
> pc we all know and 'love'. ...

>
> I don't have a killfile Jan , I am prepared to see any messages from
> anyone. I have often taken issue with what people say here but I would not
> wish to censor them, even if I can't make much sense of them
>
>
> a happy new years golfing to you Jan and all on uksg.

>
> Thank you, Malcolm, for giving home to my question.
>
>
> As I told you, I have no experience in match play, least of all in
> team matchplay. OTOH, I am very keen to read and learn about it,
> given that I'll have to prepare for my first matchplay start in April.
> Therefore, I read the thread "Match play issue" attentively.
>
> There, the fact puzzles me that the two players of a team make differing
> statements. I consider this to be a crucial point of the story.
>
> Dec. 30-2 a reads:
> "A side may be represented by one partner for all or any part of a match"
> Would it be correct to include declarations (e.g. concessions) and claims
> into this "representation"? After all, these are part of the match(?)
>
> Please tell me: ...

>
> My thanks to you, Peter, and to John for your opinions on this subject.
>
> 2-4/21 tells us that if two sides cannot arrange to play a match by the
> closing date for the round, they need not play at all!!
> All they have to do is toss a coin to decide who concedes the match -
> heads, B must concede the match to A: tails, A must concede the match to
> B!!
> 2-4/21 also says that although the CoC may say the match has to be played
> as a 4-ball match over 18 holes, the sides could decide the result by
> playing tennis, bridge or even with a putting competition.
> Imagine the scene in the clubhouse a year later. A member looks up at the
> honours board and asks how it is that Fred won the singles match-play last
> year when he is considered the worst player in the club. A long-standing
> member tells him Fred won it by playing every round as a tiddlywinks match
> and he is brilliant at tiddlywinks!
>

>
> "Kev Nurse" kevnurse.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1166740313.528222.154660@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

>> Malcolm Wadsworth wrote:

>>> Sorry, Kev. How could I forget you!!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Malcolm

>>
>> Up here, in the forgotten land that is N Scotland, Forres GC were lucky
>> enough, tonight, to get through to the next round. Our opponents, The
>> Nairn GC, made a good fist of it and were in the lead by a point after
>> the 1st two 2 rounds. However, due to an understandable error, they
>> dropped 3 points in the 3rd round, which allowed us to take the lead
>> going into the final round, in which we were faultless. Sounds good,
>> doesn't it, but the actual scores in the first 2 rounds were nothing to
>> write home about, which is why I think we were lucky.
>> ...

>

>>
>> So still in are:
>> Bramhall Park (Pat Williams)
>> Glen (Ron Todd)
>> Roe Park (Phil Hendrick)
>> Forres (Kev Nurse)
>>
>> Any more we know with connections here?

>
> Lahinch with John Turner!
>
> JPW
>