Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic Profile…
 Up
Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: ZB
Date: Sep 7, 2006 03:33

This was posted by one of the main huns on FF (the Gub I believe?) around
the time MON was announced as the new Celtic manager. Notice how many times
he refers to Rangers as huns without any problem. Wonder when it suddenly
became a problem more recently???

"Whilst Liverpools achievements, over a quarter of a century and more
between 1963-1990, are part of footballs folklore. It should be remembered
that in 66-72, when Shanks couldnt see by the group of players, who
originally catapulted Liverpool into the spotlight. The mighty reds won
hee-haw.

Somehow I dont see that state of affairs being tolerated at Ibrox whilst
`the little general` is in charge. And that is the way it should be. There
is no room for sentiment in football. And that is not a modern view of
things, by any means.

For those of you who want to bask in the glory that was last season, buy the
video, crack open a bottle before the new season starts, watch it all again
and then forget it.

The season ahead is shaping up to be one of the most important in our
history. Super colossal just about sums it up. And on two fronts at that.
Show full article (6.66Kb)
126 Comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: Paddy
Date: Sep 7, 2006 04:03

"ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4maarpF56fqpU1@individual.net...
> This was posted by one of the main huns on FF (the Gub I believe?) around
<<<< snip >>>>

Good find, ZB. I still can't believe how some of the huns in here will swear
Celtic fans used to be called huns as far as the late 70's/early 80's.
That's laughable and some what sad that Follow Follow can take over
someone's brain like that.

Paddy
2 Comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: ZB
Date: Sep 7, 2006 04:09

"Paddy" nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:edou9q$pvg$1@news.datemas.de...
>
> "ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4maarpF56fqpU1@individual.net...
>> This was posted by one of the main huns on FF (the Gub I believe?) around
> <<<< snip >>>>
>
> Good find, ZB.

I can't take any credit for finding it, it was a sticky on a message board
> I still can't believe how some of the huns in here will swear Celtic fans
> used to be called huns as far as the late 70's/early 80's.

It's a lie, plain and simple. But then you see that the same people who
perpetuate this myth are also guilty of using child abuse for point-scoring,
so there are no depths to which they will not sink.
> That's laughable and some what sad that Follow Follow can take over
> someone's brain like that.

To be fair, I dont think these guys between them have a brain to take over.
1 Comment
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: :-p
Date: Sep 7, 2006 04:45

ZB wrote:
> "Paddy" nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:edou9q$pvg$1@news.datemas.de...
>>
>> "ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4maarpF56fqpU1@individual.net...
>>> This was posted by one of the main huns on FF (the Gub I believe?) around
>> <<<< snip >>>>
>>
>> Good find, ZB.
>
> I can't take any credit for finding it, it was a sticky on a message board
Show full article (1.41Kb)
no comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: Jason
Date: Sep 7, 2006 05:45

The prediction about how things would pan out for both teams is laughable.

Does this guy do that for a living?

--
Jason
16 Comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: :-p
Date: Sep 7, 2006 05:50

Jason wrote:
> The prediction about how things would pan out for both teams is laughable.
>
> Does this guy do that for a living?
>
> --
moderates the cuddleboard.
2 Comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: ZB
Date: Sep 7, 2006 05:59

"Jason" ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:WvULg.1662$s4.646@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>
> The prediction about how things would pan out for both teams is laughable.

Yeah, quite funny, but in his defence I doubt many would have predicted the
impact MON would make in such a short period of time. For me it kills stone
dead the argument that these pricks have been circulating for the last
couple of years that "hun" is a bigoted word. They have some kind of agenda,
God knows what it is. They should maybe use their energy for something a bit
more useful.
12 Comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: Jason
Date: Sep 7, 2006 08:22

":-p" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1157633422.265414.104220@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jason wrote:
>> The prediction about how things would pan out for both teams is
>> laughable.
>>
>> Does this guy do that for a living?
>>
>> --
> moderates the cuddleboard.

Thick Jim.

--
Jason
1 Comment
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: Jason
Date: Sep 7, 2006 08:23

"ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4majcsF5c56vU1@individual.net...
>
> "Jason" ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:WvULg.1662$s4.646@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>>
>> The prediction about how things would pan out for both teams is
>> laughable.
>
> Yeah, quite funny, but in his defence I doubt many would have predicted
> the impact MON would make in such a short period of time. For me it kills
> stone dead the argument that these pricks have been circulating for the
> last couple of years that "hun" is a bigoted word. They have some kind of
> agenda, God knows what it is. They should maybe use their energy for
> something a bit more useful.
>
Prevarication.
--
Jason
no comments
Re: Some evidence of FF revisionism re the hun word         


Author: :-D
Date: Sep 7, 2006 08:59

Jason wrote:
> ":-p" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1157633422.265414.104220@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Jason wrote:
>>> The prediction about how things would pan out for both teams is
>>> laughable.
>>>
>>> Does this guy do that for a living?
>>>
>>> --
>> moderates the cuddleboard.
>
> Thick Jim.
>
> --
> Jason

Phanny ;-)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Re: Ideology over Evidence on Alt.Revisionism . Hoess confession is a farcealt.revisionism ·
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9