Smudger smith
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic Profile…
 Up
Smudger smith         


Author: Chuckles McGuigan
Date: Sep 4, 2007 14:31

So nobody listens, eh? and this is only the start of what is yet to
come.

Thank you for your comments which I confirm have been passed to the
Secretary for his attention.

You may wish to note that your comments will be reviewed alongside
reports, if any, from the Police Match Commander, the Referee and / or
his Assistants, the SPL Match Delegate and the Clubs involved in the
League Match in question. In the event that this review leads to the
opinion that there has been a failure by either Club to discharge
their respective requirements under SPL Rules H7.5 and H7.6 then the
SPL Board may initiate disciplinary proceedings.

Either the SPL Board or a committee of the SPL Board or a Commission
appointed by the SPL Board would determine, following a hearing,
whether there has in fact been any breach of or failure to fulfil the
SPL Rules. Any Commission so appointed shall comprise at least three
members and, in the event of an allegation of a breach of SPL Rules
H7.5 or H7.6, the chairman of the Commission shall be an advocate or
solicitor of not less than 10 years standing.
Show full article (1.41Kb)
30 Comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Ally D
Date: Sep 4, 2007 15:34

"Chuckles McGuigan" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1188941486.158321.86270@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> So nobody listens, eh? and this is only the start of what is yet to
> come.
>
> Thank you for your comments which I confirm have been passed to the
> Secretary for his attention.
>

what?!

someone spent the time to send you an auto-acknowledgement that they'd
received your email. F*cking hell. Hold the front page. Jim's got the ear
of the authorities!

Today a read receipt, tomorrow the world!
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: raymond Blair
Date: Sep 4, 2007 16:49

"Chuckles McGuigan" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1188941486.158321.86270@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> So nobody listens, eh? and this is only the start of what is yet to
> come.
>
> Thank you for your comments which I confirm have been passed to the
> Secretary for his attention.
>
>
>
> You may wish to note that your comments will be reviewed alongside
> reports, if any, from the Police Match Commander, the Referee and / or
> his Assistants, the SPL Match Delegate and the Clubs involved in the
> League Match in question. In the event that this review leads to the
> opinion that there has been a failure by either Club to discharge
> their respective requirements under SPL Rules H7.5 and H7.6 then the
> SPL Board may initiate disciplinary proceedings.
>
>
> ...
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Chuckles McGuigan
Date: Sep 4, 2007 22:32

On Sep 4, 11:34 pm, "Ally D" nomailthanks.com> wrote:
> "Chuckles McGuigan" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:1188941486.158321.86270@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
>> So nobody listens, eh? and this is only the start of what is yet to
>> come.
>
>> Thank you for your comments which I confirm have been passed to the
>> Secretary for his attention.
>
> what?!
>
> someone spent the time to send you an auto-acknowledgement that they'd
> received your email. F*cking hell. Hold the front page. Jim's got the ear
> of the authorities!
>
> Today a read receipt, tomorrow the world!
Show full article (0.78Kb)
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Jonbhoy
Date: Sep 5, 2007 02:07

"Chuckles McGuigan" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1188970338.120236.244110@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 4, 11:34 pm, "Ally D" nomailthanks.com> wrote:
>> "Chuckles McGuigan" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1188941486.158321.86270@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> So nobody listens, eh? and this is only the start of what is yet to
>>> come.
>>
>>> Thank you for your comments which I confirm have been passed to the
>>> Secretary for his attention.
>>
>> what?!
>>
>> someone spent the time to send you an auto-acknowledgement that they'd
>> received your email. F*cking hell. Hold the front page. Jim's got the
>> ear
>> of the authorities!
>> ...
Show full article (1.08Kb)
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Chuckles McGuigan
Date: Sep 5, 2007 02:34

On Sep 5, 10:07 am, "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote:
>
> Bet it was fucking kleenex overload in your house when you got that standard
> computer print off from them! Bloody funny!
>
> JB
More dirty thoughts about men.
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Jonbhoy
Date: Sep 5, 2007 02:52

"Chuckles McGuigan" hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1188984877.996130.157350@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 5, 10:07 am, "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Bet it was fucking kleenex overload in your house when you got that
>> standard
>> computer print off from them! Bloody funny!
>>
>> JB
> More dirty thoughts about men.

Says the man spending his time looking up images of men in beds! Good try at
diverting,shame it failed as usual!Your in denial Jim!

JB
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Stewart Smith
Date: Sep 5, 2007 02:55

Jonbhoy wrote:
>
> Bet it was fucking kleenex overload in your house when you got that standard
> computer print off from them! Bloody funny!
>

I think he fancies me, he's forever inventing pet names. Anyway I
thought we weren't supposed to be replying, I wouldn't even have seen
this otherwise. Anyway, I'm sure they're passing round Jim's email at
the SPL just to laugh at the spelling. Maybe it was phone calls that
they weren't going to take into account, there was certainly something.
Ignoring the phone makes sense, I'd imagine it would be something like
listening to the incoherent drunks on Real Radio (and that's just the
presenters, badum tish!)

Smudger
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: Paddy
Date: Sep 5, 2007 03:14

"Stewart Smith" ee.ed.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:fbluev$349$1@scotsman.ed.ac.uk...
> Jonbhoy wrote:
>>
>> Bet it was fucking kleenex overload in your house when you got that
>> standard computer print off from them! Bloody funny!
>>
>
> I think he fancies me, he's forever inventing pet names. Anyway I thought
> we weren't supposed to be replying, I wouldn't even have seen this
> otherwise. Anyway, I'm sure they're passing round Jim's email at the SPL
> just to laugh at the spelling. Maybe it was phone calls that they weren't
> going to take into account, there was certainly something. Ignoring the
> phone makes sense, I'd imagine it would be something like listening to the
> incoherent drunks on Real Radio (and that's just the presenters, badum
> tish!)
>
> Smudger
Show full article (1.17Kb)
no comments
Re: Smudger smith         


Author: littlebhoybri
Date: Sep 5, 2007 04:05

glesgabear@hotmail.co.uk wrote in message,

The best laugh I've had for ages.

ROTFLMAOATTKDCJ

littlebhoybri
no comments
1 2 3 4