saxon
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
Search only in:
uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
Group Profile...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 582 articles for 0.002 sec
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Vernon North
Date: Dec 9, 2006 08:06

...,000 years - Attila the Hun's descendents thrived as a royal family for three hundred years in Europe and England. - Saxons didn't exist before the 4th century -- they were actually the descendents of Huns - The word "Saxon" comes from the Korean word for "sprout", NOT, as historians say, from the word "sax" meaning 2-edged ...
Show full article (3.16Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Vernon North
Date: Dec 7, 2006 16:09

...And your comeback is . . . . ???? Record says Saxons were nort even a part of ...These mercenary soldiers were Angles and Saxons from northern Germany." So, the Saxons... of Roman Britain before the Saxons were to effectively take over."... happened then? "Eventually the Anglo Saxon mercenaries realised that they were ... you have so often claimed. Saxons were located in the present ...
Show full article (4.18Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Supertech
Date: Dec 7, 2006 11:27

... actually, not to the Picts, but to the Saxons. Saxons only moved there after the Britain fell to the Picts led by the Huns. Record says Saxons were nort even a part of the first raid...-west Germany, as you have so often claimed. Saxons were located in the present day Netherlands, moron.... from the central government of Rome. Records says Saxons were pushed out of their land in fear ...
Show full article (3.44Kb)
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Vernon North
Date: Dec 6, 2006 22:52

... He was at the peak of his power. So what?? Since they couldn't get help, Roman ruled Britain fell to Picts. But not to the Huns. And actually, not to the Picts, but to the Saxons. Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. Smell isn't everything . . . He reigned over what was then Europe's largest ...
Show full article (2.16Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Supertech
Date: Dec 6, 2006 22:00

... peak of his power. Wrong. The Saxons began to fill the void left ...contested with credible backup: "The Anglo-Saxon Invasions In 410, the Roman emperor... and Denmark in which the Saxons resided. So your claim about a Hun connection to the Saxons is BULLSHIT, as usual. And here... and Huns. This allowed the Saxons, Jutes and Angles to invade ...
Show full article (10.35Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Supertech
Date: Dec 6, 2006 21:19

...peak of his power. Wrong. The Saxons began to fill the void left... with credible backup: "The Anglo-Saxon Invasions In 410, the Roman emperor... a Hun connection to the Saxons is BULLSHIT, as usual. And ... and Huns. This allowed the Saxons, Jutes and Angles to invade ...) generals and military tacticians lead Saxons into the British isle and ...
Show full article (10.63Kb) · Show article thread
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Vernon North
Date: Dec 6, 2006 07:33

... peak of his power. Wrong. The Saxons began to fill the void left...contested with credible backup: "The Anglo-Saxon Invasions In 410, the Roman emperor...Vandals and Huns. This allowed the Saxons, Jutes and Angles to invade ...) generals and military tacticians lead Saxons into the British isle and conquered the Roman territory, which Saxons couldn't do even if they...
Show full article (9.59Kb)
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Supertech
Date: Dec 6, 2006 05:44

... peak of his power. Wrong. The Saxons began to fill the void left ...> contested with credible backup: "The Anglo-Saxon Invasions In 410, the Roman emperor ... Vandals and Huns. This allowed the Saxons, Jutes and Angles to invade Britain ...s) generals and military tacticians lead Saxons into the British isle and conquered the Roman territory, which Saxons couldn't do even if they ...
Show full article (5.74Kb)
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Vernon North
Date: Dec 5, 2006 08:22

...contested with credible backup: "The Anglo-Saxon Invasions In 410, the Roman emperor ...http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Anglo-Saxon In addition, you've provided ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that the Saxons had any relationship with the Huns...have EVIDENCE?? WHERE IS IT????? And Saxons was a tribe living in one...had NOTHING to do with the Saxons. I've previously provided links ...
Show full article (6.64Kb)
Re: Saxons were Hun ruled     

Author: Supertech
Date: Dec 5, 2006 06:34

...Hun was at the peak of his power. And Saxons was a tribe living in one of his subjugated... to power, and it was taken over by Saxons who had already been brought to Britain by the...And the Huns had NOTHING to do with the Saxons. I've previously provided links to credible sources ...it because Rome was busy with Huns in Bulgaria? Saxons never succeeded in taking British isle from Rome ...
Show full article (4.46Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next