> "Angof"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:dOqdne_7_vpgEzvVnZ2dnUVZ8sLinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>> "Angof"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:maydnd1aNaFJNjjVRVnyvgA@posted.plusnet...>>>>> "Angof"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>> news:moSdnZD4h5eBDzjVRVnyjgA@posted.plusnet...>>>>>> "liam*"
googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:d08618e7-dd6e-42ff-808c-de311ecd463d@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>>>>>>> "ZB"
hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dry my eyes? Get over what? As usual, you made a cunt of yourself
>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>> thread.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So why not join in and and show me where I've made a cunt of it
>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>> making silly little chidish remarks to a third party? Fucking hell
>>>>>>>> if i
>>>>>>>> kept doing that you'd be running around with wet knickers
>>>>>>>> screaming,
>>>>>>>> 'stalker! stalker!" Hehe...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't you think you are being your usual self though?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is being totally gob smacked at some of the daft questions people ask
>>>>>> being my usual self? If so, yes I am.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Gob smacked" is not a term I associate with many of your posts. "Dry
>>>>> your eyes" on the other hand...
>>>>
>>>> That's nice for you. Indecipherable nonsense is something I associate
>>>> with the majority of your posts but there we are. Instead of coming
>>>> out with this inane crap, why didn't you and your wee pal Dorothy
>>>> Lamour comment on what is actually said in the thread?
>>>
>>> Well, that's certainly much more like the old Angof we all know...But
>>> whilst you may have been charged a jam jar to see here on the silver
>>> screen....Dorothy Lamour was abit before my time auld yin.
>>
>> ...and that is not the new or the old Liam, just the norm. Avoiding the
>> question but continuing with the nonsense.
>
> Hold on a minute, you failed to answer my first question to you in this
> thread
I did answer actually, not that it was a serious question...surely to fuck?
>and attempt to turn this into another long thread with nonsense.
You and your wee pal seem to have a problem with how this works. For
example...he comes into a thread and makes a comment about something I've
said, fair enough, I reply. He does likewise and so on. After a while he
accuses me of stalking him, LMAO. On this occasion he's accusing me of
drawing out threads, after he resurrects this dead one, and answers every
post...WTF?
Now you make a comment in this thread and I reply. Now it appears if I
reply I'm trying to turn the thread into a 'long thread'...you are as nuts
as he is. You do realise that you don't have to reply, right? And you do
realise that you and your pal are also contributing to this thread, right?
