> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:48a5b0cf$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:maydnd1aNaFJNjjVRVnyvgA@posted.plusnet...

>>> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:48a5977a$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:moSdnZD4h5eBDzjVRVnyjgA@posted.plusnet...

>>>>> "liam*" googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:d08618e7-dd6e-42ff-808c-de311ecd463d@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>>>>>> "ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Dry my eyes? Get over what? As usual, you made a cunt of yourself
>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>> thread.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> So why not join in and and show me where I've made a cunt of it
>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>> making silly little chidish remarks to a third party? Fucking hell
>>>>>>> if i
>>>>>>> kept doing that you'd be running around with wet knickers screaming,
>>>>>>> 'stalker! stalker!" Hehe...

>>>>>

>>>>>>Don't you think you are being your usual self though?

>>>>>
>>>>> Is being totally gob smacked at some of the daft questions people ask
>>>>> being my usual self? If so, yes I am.

>>>>
>>>> "Gob smacked" is not a term I associate with many of your posts. "Dry
>>>> your eyes" on the other hand...

>>>
>>> That's nice for you. Indecipherable nonsense is something I associate
>>> with the majority of your posts but there we are. Instead of coming out
>>> with this inane crap, why didn't you and your wee pal Dorothy Lamour
>>> comment on what is actually said in the thread?

>>
>> Well, that's certainly much more like the old Angof we all know...But
>> whilst you may have been charged a jam jar to see here on the silver
>> screen....Dorothy Lamour was abit before my time auld yin.

>
> ...and that is not the new or the old Liam, just the norm. Avoiding the
> question but continuing with the nonsense.