Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic Profile…
 Up
Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: ZB
Date: May 10, 2008 16:41

That should liven things up a bit. Or perhaps not.
43 Comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: allanelder
Date: May 10, 2008 17:38

On May 10, 6:41 pm, "ZB" hotmail.com> wrote:
> That should liven things up a bit. Or perhaps not.

Quite correct, Hunt should have been sent off, Fergie should have been
given a penalty and the number of times the officiating crew called
Nacho wrongly offside was criminal.
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Date: May 10, 2008 18:04

"ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:68mq65F2tienfU1@mid.individual.net...
> That should liven things up a bit. Or perhaps not.

I thought he was spot on (get it ?) with his decisions today, and I think
your were off(side) the mark saying anything to the contrary LOL

--

V.O.R.

If you dont believe me, ask me.
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: ZB
Date: May 10, 2008 19:29

"Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
news:JJGdnbUEQI7d27vVRVnyiQA@posted.plusnet...
>
> "ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:68mq65F2tienfU1@mid.individual.net...
>> That should liven things up a bit. Or perhaps not.
>
> I thought he was spot on (get it ?) with his decisions today, and I think
> your were off(side) the mark saying anything to the contrary LOL

I didn't say anything to the contrary, just opening the floor for a wee bit
of debate. Curious to know if any Rangers fans think that Mike McCurry is a
blatant cheat in favour of Rangers or just by sheer chance always makes
decisions in Rangers' favour? I wouldn't like to comment either way.
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: andy
Date: May 10, 2008 19:51

I wouldn't like to comment either way.
>

you just did!

swings and roundabout tbh, you lot shouldnt have had the corner u got the
winner from last week for instance?
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: ZB
Date: May 10, 2008 22:29

"andy" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3IKdndK7yu6lwrvVnZ2dnUVZ8h-dnZ2d@bt.com...
> I wouldn't like to comment either way.
>>
>
> you just did!

No I didnt!
> swings and roundabout tbh, you lot shouldnt have had the corner u got the
> winner from last week for instance?

It's funny how certain decisions Celtic get are amplified like the corner
which never was (which actually was a corner) but no mention of Motherwell's
corner. Similarly Naka "dive" which was a clear free kick, Samaras perfectly
good goal disallowed before Aberdeen also get a goal disallowed, McDonald
marginal offside decision. None of the big decisions yesterday were close to
marginal, were they.

Anyway, back to the original point, blatant cheat coincidentally in favour
of Rangers every game or just incompetent?
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: Mad Max
Date: May 10, 2008 23:23

On May 11, 3:51 am, "andy" hotmail.com> wrote:
>  I wouldn't like to comment either way.
>
>
>
> you just did!
>
> swings and roundabout tbh, you lot shouldnt have had the corner u got the
> winner from last week for instance?

Their last four games Andy the ref has gave them a Hand a foot and and
a header, the goal was offside, so unless the rules have changed just
for our games, that if the ball clips a blue player when an Orange
player is off side then its onside.

as for the penalty shout, cunt dived, as walter said lets look at the
season.

Goals chopped off, perfect goals
Penalty's denied that were penalty's
offside when we are well on side.
celtic
Show full article (1.66Kb)
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: Moody Marco
Date: May 11, 2008 00:16

ZB wrote:
> That should liven things up a bit. Or perhaps not.

I know it's an obvious troll, but I'll answer with some honest thoughts
anyway - I thought the linesman was as much to blame for any bad decisions
yesterday.

While I agree Hunt should have had a penalty, I don't think it's quite as
much a stonewaller as they're making out - he played for it when he seen
Weir coming in, and I've seen those kind of ones NOT given frequently.

And going by the letter of the law, if Cousin should have been off (which he
should have been), so should Wilkie for raising his hands.

Novo was also wrongly called offside when clean through. The officials had
a bad game, end of story. It (mostly) went in our favour. Deal with it.

Have you commented yet on Celtic getting a corner against Motherwell that
led to the winner? What about Aberdeen's late disallowed equaliser?
Admittedly everyone stopped in that game when the whistle went, but the fact
is it was wrongly called handball and Diamond might have scored even if the
other players hadn't stopped.
Show full article (1.83Kb)
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: dü the hüsker
Date: May 11, 2008 10:13

"ZB" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:68mq65F2tienfU1@mid.individual.net...
> That should liven things up a bit. Or perhaps not.
>

Not much to discuss there ZB, McCurry has been at it all season. Yesterday
he just got desperate and was willing to do anything to ensure a victory for
the bigots. It's always been that way but yesterday was the most blatant
cheating I've ever witnessed.
no comments
Re: Mike McCurry, blatant cheat: discuss         


Author: dü the hüsker
Date: May 11, 2008 10:15

"andy" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3IKdndK7yu6lwrvVnZ2dnUVZ8h-dnZ2d@bt.com...
> I wouldn't like to comment either way.
>>
>
> you just did!
>
> swings and roundabout tbh, you lot shouldnt have had the corner u got the
> winner from last week for instance?
>

Is that it? A corner? pmsl
no comments
1 2 3 4 5