Group: uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic · Group Profile
Author: liam*liam* Date: Sep 10, 2008 13:11
"Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:SqSdnfQY94uKDlrVnZ2dnUVZ8qvinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:Q92dnd6JtJixJVvVnZ2dnUVZ8sLinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:yIudnR3bYoh-21_VnZ2dnUVZ8s3inZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:sJudne3NouH2Sl3VnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So when you say "I agreed in the past we may have a bigger problem"
>>>>>>>> "on the surface", you really mean "Rangers have a particular
>>>>>>>> problem." The qualifiers "the past", "may", and "on the surface",
>>>>>>>> can all be ignored. I'm glad you can be so frank about this
>>>>>>>> without the need to mince your words and without playing the man
>>>>>>>> instead of the ball.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grow up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I do grow up Angof, shall I know the difference between when
>>>>>> something *may* be the case and when something *is* the case? ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Grow those balls Liam.
>>>>
>>>> Develop some language skills, my cliched amigo...or *maybe* you
>>>> can't... roll on another episode of ng bullshit bingo...since you
>>>> haven't
>>>> agreed that there really is a difference between something that *may*
>>>> be the case...and something that *is* the case...LOL..
>>>
>>> ...I don't think I'll be taking advice on that subject
>>
>> *May* be you should.Unless you can be clear in this thread without them,
>> best stick to the NG cliches. What *is* it to be?
>
> Maybe you should hold...your hands up. Better that than this playing
> semantics.
It's more than semantics to identify a difference between the statement
"something *may* be the case" and "something *is* the case". Don't you
think? Come on Angof, don't be frit.
| 
