> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:48c69138$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:yIudnR3bYoh-21_VnZ2dnUVZ8s3inZ2d@posted.plusnet...

>>> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:48c1b3d9$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:sJudne3NouH2Sl3VnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d@posted.plusnet...

>>>>> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>> news:48c00067$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>>>>>>
>>>>>> So when you say "I agreed in the past we may have a bigger problem"
>>>>>> "on the surface", you really mean "Rangers have a particular
>>>>>> problem." The qualifiers "the past", "may", and "on the surface", can
>>>>>> all be ignored. I'm glad you can be so frank about this without the
>>>>>> need to mince your words and without playing the man instead of the
>>>>>> ball.

>>>>>
>>>>> Grow up.

>>>>
>>>> When I do grow up Angof, shall I know the difference between when
>>>> something *may* be the case and when something *is* the case? ;)

>>>
>>> Grow those balls Liam.

>>
>> Develop some language skills, my cliched amigo...or *maybe* you can't...
>> roll on another episode of ng bullshit bingo...since you haven't
>> agreed that there really is a difference between something that *may*
>> be the case...and something that *is* the case...LOL..

>
> ...I don't think I'll be taking advice on that subject