> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:yIudnR3bYoh-21_VnZ2dnUVZ8s3inZ2d@posted.plusnet...

>> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:48c1b3d9$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:sJudne3NouH2Sl3VnZ2dnUVZ8gidnZ2d@posted.plusnet...

>>>> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:48c00067$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...

>>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>> news:f46dnbTXkf6IRiLVnZ2dnUVZ8uCdnZ2d@posted.plusnet...

>>>>>> "liam*" mail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:48bfc08a$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Clearly you deny Rangers have a particular problem.

>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have said before that Rangers have a worse problem, (at least on
>>>>>> the surface), I've even said it in this thread. Clearly you are
>>>>>> talking shite.

>>>>>
>>>>> So when you say "I agreed in the past we may have a bigger problem"
>>>>> "on the surface", you really mean "Rangers have a particular problem."
>>>>> The qualifiers "the past", "may", and "on the surface", can all be
>>>>> ignored. I'm glad you can be so frank about this without the need to
>>>>> mince your words and without playing the man instead of the ball.

>>>>
>>>> Grow up.

>>>
>>> When I do grow up Angof, shall I know the difference between when
>>> something *may* be the case and when something *is* the case? ;)

>>
>> Grow those balls Liam.

>
> Develop some language skills...