 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Stewart SmithStewart Smith Date: Sep 4, 2008 04:51
Angof wrote:
>>
>> Id disagree,from most reports it seems there were sectarian comments
>> aimed at Lennon before and during the attack
>
> I know and I don't agree that's enough to make the motive of this attack
> (assuming there was one) sectarian.
So what would? I think as far as the police are concerned, any assault
accompanied with a shout of "Fenian Bastard" is good enough to be
counted as sectarian aggravation.
Stewart
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: AngofAngof Date: Sep 4, 2008 05:56
> Clearly you deny Rangers have a particular problem.
>
I have said before that Rangers have a worse problem, (at least on the
surface), I've even said it in this thread. Clearly you are talking shite.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: AngofAngof Date: Sep 4, 2008 06:22
"Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
news:lqydnZSRKODyViLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com...>
> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:7dednWvKh_GLNCLVRVnyhgA@posted.plusnet...>>
>> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
>> news:YZadnZMU67z5OSLVnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@giganews.com...>>>
>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:4fudnbCCPtYrAyLVnZ2dnUVZ8tninZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>>
>>>> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:DpOdnf2k_tfsSSPVnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>... although the attack on Lennon at the weekend does tend to point to
>>>>>a bigoted attack.
>>>>
>>>> ...
|
| Show full article (2.64Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JonbhoyJonbhoy Date: Sep 4, 2008 06:44
"Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:w5WdnV-akqqKfCLVnZ2dnUVZ8tzinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>
> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
> news:lqydnZSRKODyViLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com...>>
>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:7dednWvKh_GLNCLVRVnyhgA@posted.plusnet...>>>
>>> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
>>> news:YZadnZMU67z5OSLVnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@giganews.com...>>>>
>>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:4fudnbCCPtYrAyLVnZ2dnUVZ8tninZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>>>
>>>>> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:DpOdnf2k_tfsSSPVnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>... although the attack on Lennon at the weekend does tend to point to ...
|
| Show full article (3.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AngofAngof Date: Sep 4, 2008 07:41
"Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
news:wrKdne7uMJKpeyLVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@giganews.com...>
> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:w5WdnV-akqqKfCLVnZ2dnUVZ8tzinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>
>
> Well lets be real about it,would you say any decent sane person would
> shout out sectarian phrases before attacking someone?
No decent person would attack someone in this way so that's not really very
real.
>The events have been made clear enough and verified by independent
>witnesses
I didn't know that. Who were these independant witnesses and what did they
say?
> (Of course they will no doubt all be seen as celtic fans by many rangers
> fans) ,
|
| Show full article (2.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: sepangsepang Date: Sep 4, 2008 07:51
"Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4fudnbCCPtYrAyLVnZ2dnUVZ8tninZ2d@posted.plusnet...
I just wish Neil Lennon would press charges against these people that
nearly
killed him and then the full truth might come out and the need for people
to
pre-judge wouldn't be necessary.
Its not up to him,in Scotland the PF looks at the evidence to decide who is
to be charged,even if they are identified and Lennon wants no further action
taken they go to court if there is enough evidence.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JonbhoyJonbhoy Date: Sep 4, 2008 08:00
"Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:taSdncznrP0LbiLVnZ2dnUVZ8t3inZ2d@posted.plusnet...>
> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
> news:wrKdne7uMJKpeyLVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@giganews.com...>>
>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:w5WdnV-akqqKfCLVnZ2dnUVZ8tzinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>
>>
>> Well lets be real about it,would you say any decent sane person would
>> shout out sectarian phrases before attacking someone?
>
> No decent person would attack someone in this way so that's not really
> very real.
>
>>The events have been made clear enough and verified by independent
>>witnesses
>
> I didn't know that. Who were these independant witnesses and what did ...
|
| Show full article (3.51Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AngofAngof Date: Sep 4, 2008 08:24
"Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
news:JuidnfLsT-WBZSLVnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d@giganews.com...>
> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:taSdncznrP0LbiLVnZ2dnUVZ8t3inZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>
>> "Jonbhoy" champsagain.com> wrote in message
>> news:wrKdne7uMJKpeyLVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@giganews.com...>>>
>>> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:w5WdnV-akqqKfCLVnZ2dnUVZ8tzinZ2d@posted.plusnet...>>>>
>>>
>>> Well lets be real about it,would you say any decent sane person would
>>> shout out sectarian phrases before attacking someone?
>>
>> No decent person would attack someone in this way so that's not really
>> very real.
>>
>>>The events have been made clear enough and verified by independent ...
|
| Show full article (3.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: FishSupperFishSupper Date: Sep 4, 2008 06:42
> "Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:xcidnWxYnPQqJCLVnZ2dnUVZ8qPinZ2d@posted.plusnet...> Clearly you deny Rangers have a particular problem.
>>> While I've agreed in the past we may have a bigger problem,
Yep, you've got Angof bang to rights there, liam*. Clearly he's denying
that we have a bigger problem, when he says "While I've agreed in the past
we may have a bigger problem".
You can tell in the way he writes "While I've agreed in the past we may have
a bigger problem" that hes denying it.
I think it's just the tone of "While I've agreed in the past we may have a
bigger problem" or maybe the spacing of the letters, whatever it is he's
clearly denying it.
Well done you for exposing him as a Denialist.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: liam*liam* Date: Sep 4, 2008 08:36
"Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:f46dnbTXkf6IRiLVnZ2dnUVZ8uCdnZ2d@posted.plusnet...>> Clearly you deny Rangers have a particular problem.
>
> I have said before that Rangers have a worse problem, (at least on the
> surface), I've even said it in this thread. Clearly you are talking
> shite.
So when you say "I agreed in the past we may have a bigger problem" "on the
surface", you really mean "Rangers have a particular problem." The
qualifiers "the past", "may", and "on the surface", can all be ignored. I'm
glad you can be so frank about this without the need to mince your words
and without playing the man instead of the ball.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
