|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Date: Apr 20, 2008 10:55
Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i have
to ask the following question
Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
allegedly went on ?
--
V.O.R.
If you dont believe me, ask me.
|
| |
|
| | 53 Comments |
|
|
Author: Chuckles McGuiganChuckles McGuigan Date: Apr 20, 2008 11:27
On 20 Apr, 18:55, "Voice Of Reason"
wrote:
> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i have
> to ask the following question
>
> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
> allegedly went on ?
>
> --
>
> V.O.R.
>
> If you dont believe me, ask me.
There was whispers, we are saying when he found out he did not report
it to the police and for decades children were left in danger because
CFC covered it up, and after it went to court it all came out Who
knew, they did nothing at the time, They did nothing to ease tha pain
of the victims after, wahat they did do was sack one of 25 years
service for bad time keeping after a cleaner found photos.
|
| Show full article (3.76Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Chuckles McGuiganChuckles McGuigan Date: Apr 20, 2008 11:37
On 20 Apr, 18:55, "Voice Of Reason"
wrote:
> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i have
> to ask the following question
>
> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
> allegedly went on ?
>
> --
>
> V.O.R.
>
> If you dont believe me, ask me.
Forgot to add.
to all Celtic supporters protecting Stiens memory is more important
than Protecting children from known abusers
and there was nothing allegedly about it.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Moody MarcoMoody Marco Date: Apr 20, 2008 13:44
Voice Of Reason wrote:
> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again,
> i have to ask the following question
>
> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
> allegedly went on ?
Was the child abuse "alleged"?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AngofAngof Date: Apr 21, 2008 03:14
"Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
news:FZWdndzuYeMAHpbVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i
> have
> to ask the following question
>
> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
> allegedly went on ?
>
>
There's nothing alleged about the abuse for a start. From my perspective I
couldn't give a shit whether he knew or not (and I don't know)...it still is
not right to use this issue to have a go at your football rivals.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: JonbhoyJonbhoy Date: Apr 21, 2008 04:05
"Angof" yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:S62dnQ9q8f-e9JHVnZ2dnUVZ8sKlnZ2d@plusnet...>
> "Voice Of Reason" wrote in message
> news:FZWdndzuYeMAHpbVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@plusnet...
>> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i
>> have
>> to ask the following question
>>
>> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
>> allegedly went on ?
>>
>>
>
> There's nothing alleged about the abuse for a start. From my perspective
> I couldn't give a shit whether he knew or not (and I don't know)...it
> still is not right to use this issue to have a go at your football rivals.
|
| Show full article (0.99Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: liam67liam67 Date: Apr 21, 2008 09:26
"Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>
> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i have
> to ask the following question
>
> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
> allegedly went on ?
Are you genuinely interested VOR or are you just trying to shit stir
using child abuse? I'm sure the other huns will find you an
embarrassment if you are shit stirring...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Apr 21, 2008 11:46
> "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>>
>> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i
>> have
>> to ask the following question
>>
>> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
>> allegedly went on ?
>
> Are you genuinely interested VOR or are you just trying to shit stir
> using child abuse? I'm sure the other huns will find you an
> embarrassment if you are shit stirring...
No I am not shit stirring, in fact anyone who reads the post correctly will
see I am not stirring. I dont know much about the BJK thing and wanted to
know why Rangers fans would be saying things like...
|
| Show full article (1.65Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: smesme Date: Apr 21, 2008 12:00
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:46:44 GMT and in uk.sport.football.clubs.celtic,
Voice Of Reason wrote....
>> "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the BJK thing has...
|
| Show full article (2.26Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: liam*liam* Date: Apr 21, 2008 12:19
"Voice Of Reason" wrote
> "liam67" wrote
>> "Voice Of Reason" wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the BJK thing has reared its head in the past few posts again, i
>>> have
>>> to ask the following question
>>>
>>> Is there any 100 %% proof that big Jock knew of the child abuse that
>>> allegedly went on ?
>>
>> Are you genuinely interested VOR or are you just trying to shit stir
>> using child abuse? I'm sure the other huns will find you an
>> embarrassment if you are shit stirring...
>
> No I am not shit stirring, in fact anyone who reads the post correctly will
> see I am not stirring. I dont know much about the BJK thing and wanted to
> know why Rangers fans would be saying things like that if they were in fact
> not true. From what I have read it seems to me that while it is a bit of a
> cheap shot at our rivals, it is not revelling I child abuse as suggested by ...
|
| Show full article (1.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
