> "Moody Marco" wrote

>> "liam" wrote

>>> "Moody Marco" wrote

>>>> "liam*" wrote
>>>> \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote:

>>>>> "FishSupper" wrote:
>>>>>

>>>>>> Larsson would be first choice for any Old Firm IX.

>>>>>
>>>>> Not if Smith was picking the team and was going with the lone striker
>>>>> formation!
>>>>> *snigger*
>>>>> He'd no doubt put Durie in!

>>>>

>>>>>I didn't watch the game last night and didn't really read any match
>>>>>reviews apart from Metro (what a bloody bad excuse for a newspaper)
>>>>>but what amazes me is that you scored four goals away from home
>>>>>playing 4-5-1.....it just makes no bloody sense to me...:¬(.....

>>>>
>>>> I wonder if our 1st and 4th goals count as "anti football"?
>>>>
>>>> Also nice to see our "anti football" has not only put us 4 points clear
>>>> of Celtic, but scored the exact same number of goals...

>>>
>>> Rangers are playing "anti-football"!?!...that's news to me... ;)

>>
>> Apparently some people consider our brand of football to be "anti
>> football". Whatever that is, it's brought us more goals than Celtic this
>> season in the league so far.
>>
>> Maybe it means in the CL only? Well, we scored more goals in 6 group
>> games there than Celtic did, despite being seeded lower and being in a
>> tougher group. In fact we scored the same number goals in 6 group games
>> as Celtic did in 6 group games plus the 1st leg of the next round.
>>
>> Just think how many goals we'd score if we *didn't* play anti-football!

>
> I suppose if you played more attacking football you'd be likely to score
> more goals...Smith likes to be more cautious and play with five in the
> middle...will be interesting to see how you get on against Werder Bremen
> playing anti-football...good luck.
>