>I must say I agree with Tommy Burns assessment on Aiden McGeady petulance.
>He's a moaning face wee twat in my eyes. I know he's talented, but gwad how
>I wish he would shut his mouth from time to time. Too often he picks up
>silly bookings for moaning to the referee. The guy really wants to reassess
>whether he wants to be considered as a professional footballer. Or just a
>moaning faced wee ned who would much rather wind up people on the park by
>pretending to throw money at them. He's paid a pretty penny by Celtic and
>not to be sitting out big games since he's been suspended. And don't bloody
>give me that he gets kicked up and down the park by opposition players. If
>you think of the treatment...

>
> Larsson would be first choice for any Old Firm IX.

> "liam" wrote:
>
>

>>I must say I agree with Tommy Burns assessment on Aiden McGeady petulance.
>>He's a moaning face wee twat in my eyes. I know he's talented, but gwad how
>>I wish he would shut his mouth from time to time. Too often he picks up
>>silly bookings for moaning to the referee. The guy really wants to reassess
>>whether he wants to be considered as a professional footballer. Or just a
>>moaning faced wee ned who would much rather wind up people on the park by
>>pretending to throw money at them. He's paid a pretty penny by Celtic and
>>not to be sitting out big games since he's been suspended. And don't bloody
>>give me that he gets kicked up and down the park by opposition players. If
>>you think of the treatment consistently dished out to Henrik Larsson and
>>how he would just dust himself down and get on with the. Aiden grow the
>>f*&k up! or piss off to the Championship with Newcastle....

>
> Difference being that Larsson was a total pro who proved himself at the very
> highest level in 3 leagues, the World Cup, the Eufa cup and the CL. Larsson
> could handle himself - i.e be a dirty fucker when required, granted it was ...

> "FishSupper" wrote:
>

>> Larsson would be first choice for any Old Firm IX.

>
> Not if Smith was picking the team and was going with the lone striker
> formation!
> *snigger*
> He'd no doubt put Durie in!

> "FishSupper" wrote:
>

>> Larsson would be first choice for any Old Firm IX.

>
> Not if Smith was picking the team and was going with the lone striker
> formation!
> *snigger*
> He'd no doubt put Durie in!

>I didn't watch the game last night and didn't really read any match
>reviews apart from Metro (what a bloody bad excuse for a newspaper)
>but what amazes me is that you scored four goals away from home
>playing 4-5-1.....it just makes no bloody sense to me...:¬(.....

> "liam*" wrote
> \\

> \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote:

>> "FishSupper" wrote:

>

>>> Larsson would be first choice for any Old Firm IX.

>

>> Not if Smith was picking the team and was going with the lone striker
>> formation!
>> *snigger*
>> He'd no doubt put Durie in!

>
> I didn't watch the game last night and didn't really read any match
> reviews apart from Metro (what a bloody bad excuse for a newspaper)
> but what amazes me is that you scored four goals away from home
> playing 4-5-1.....it just makes no bloody sense to me...:¬(.....

> "liam*" wrote:

>> \\¯`·.¸biz¸.·´¯/" wrote:

>>> "FishSupper" wrote:

>

>>>> Larsson would be first choice for any Old Firm IX.

>

>>> Not if Smith was picking the team and was going with the lone striker
>>> formation!
>>> *snigger*
>>> He'd no doubt put Durie in!

>

>> I didn't watch the game last night and didn't really read any match
>> reviews apart from Metro (what a bloody bad excuse for a newspaper)
>> but what amazes me is that you scored four goals away from home
>> playing 4-5-1.....it just makes no bloody sense to me...:¬(.....

>
> Try this, the move forward was more like 4-1-5 or at times 2-2-6 at
> one point it was 2-0-8 :-)

> Mibbees aye...mibbees naw.....but it also helped that hearts were
> playing 0-0-0....not that I'm saying they would lie down or
> anything... ;)