MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 9 July, 1999

Harassment in Poland,. July 1999

And still it continues.... in my. last fax I said that provided MI5 made no
attempts at harassment during my two-week holiday this summer, or. after I
returned to England, then I would. discontinue these faxes. Unfortunately
MI5 have continued to harass me, both. during the holiday and after my
return to London. I really dont want to continue these articles,. since
they take up so much time. and effort, not to mention expense; but the
Security Service wont even let me. have a holiday in peace and quiet, so I
have to make further efforts to bring their activities out into. the open.

In early. July I visited my aunt and her family in Poland. On Saturday 3
July 1999, I went to a family barbecue at. an allotment outside the
city. One of my aunts family has. previously shown himself to...

MI5. Have Systematically Destroyed My Life

This is getting depressing. From the feedback. Ive received, the recipients
of these. faxes are tired of hearing my complaints, and in truth I am tired
of sending them. The. reason I havent yet ceased...

MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 11 June, 1999

Harassment in a pub in Clapham, Tuesday. lunchtime

Once a month, or once every other month, I meet. a Polish friends of mine
who lives in. Clapham North, and sometimes we go to a particular pub near
where he lives.. The last time was some two months ago; I did not have my
minidisc-walkman. with me, and consequently was seriously harassed by
people MI5 had instructed. to harass me, in the pub.

This Tuesday, 8 June 1999, we again went to. the same pub for a pre-meal
drink. This time I did have my. minidisc-walkman with me. As you can guess,
we were followed into the pub by a couple of. young people (Im getting
older and older - isnt it funny how the MI5. agents all look young these
days?).. They started talking about my situation, in particular some travel
I had booked the previous day. Unfortunately, they. were talking fairly
quietly,. and my minidisc didnt pick up their speech.

MI5 are Afraid to Admit They're. Behind the Persecution

MI5 have issued a formal denial of any involvement in my. life to the
Security Service Tribunal, as you might expect them. to; but, more
importantly,. the persecutors have never denied that theyre from the
Security Service, despite several. years of accusations from my corner on
usenet and in faxed articles. I am not surprised that the. Security Service
Tribunal found "no determination in your favour".. I am however a little
surprised that the. persecutors have refused to confirm my identification
of them; by doing so, they. implicitly admit that my guess was right.

"No. determination in your favour" says the Security Service Tribunal

In 1997, I made a complaint to the Security Service Tribunal, giving. only
the bare outlines of my case. I do not think it would. have made very much
difference if Id. made a much more detailed complaint, since the Tribunal
has no ability to perform investigatory functions.. It can only ask MI5 if
they have an interest in a subject, to which MI5 are of course. free to be
"economical with the truth". A couple. of months after my complaint the
Tribunal replied. that;

MI5 Persecution: Molestation during. Travel

MI5s persecution of me varies in intensity. Since 1990. it has been steady
for perhaps 80%% of the time;. there was a notable quiet period in 1993, and
another quiet period in Jan-Feb 1995, as well as a hiatus in the. first two
months of. 1999. It puzzles me that they cease and restart, seemingly
without any logic or reason. But one aspect of. MI5s activities against me
which is relatively predictable is this. weeks articles topic, which is
Molestation during Travel. Almost every. time I cross the Atlantic, go to
the Continent or even try to enjoy a holiday in this country, you can. bet
that MI5 will. be there doing their utmost to wreck it all.

This aspect of the harassment is. particularly relevant as I will be
travelling to Europe again. in a months time, with naturally the Minidisc
recorder in tow; so it will be interesting to see if I can record. the
abuse. which will almost certainly take place, either on the Tube going to
the. airport, at the airport, on the flight, in the terminal building - MI5
have. previously instituted instances of abuse at each of these locations,
so well see how much. taxpayers money they waste this time, and whether it
will prove possible to capture. their abuse on minidisc.

Read. about the MI5 Persecution on the Web

visit our chat pages for international trade brokers at :
http://www.capitalistinternational.org

After using 10 different seo companies over the last 2 years for all
my sites the only one that got me the conversion rates like I wanted
was http://www.atomicsearchengineoptimization.com Atomic SEO.

Why do you think MI5 are responsible?

The question of who is ultimately responsible for this eight-year
harassment is one which is very difficult to answer, as the persecutors
have never clearly made their identities known to the persecutee. However,
I believe I am correct in attributing the continuing victimisation to
elements of the British Security Service MI5, and in this article, I will
try to explain the reasons for this belief.

The British internet magazine ".net" featured my website on page 17 of
their March 1998 issue (number 42). Their review kindly describes it as an
"excellent site" and gives some details of what the net surfer will find
there. Should you wish to reply to this article you can do so;

"When did you first suspect MI5 were responsible?"

Over Easter 1995 I went to see a local solicitor in London with a view to
talking to the police about the harassment. Soon afterwards I did go to my
local police station in Clapham and spoke to an officer there. The
solicitor made a comment which suggested to me that the persecution I had
been experiencing may have been organised by an intelligence service.

Faxes Sent to British Parliament logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 14,480 faxes to the British Parliament
in Westminster, of which 9,138 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 5,342 were sent via fax-modem direct from
my computer. The actual figure is obviously much higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to
be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.

441712190076 nnnnnynnEnnnnnnYYNNYYYYNENNNNNynynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190179 yyyynnyyyYnyyyyynYYYNYYYYYYEYEEEyyyyyyynyyyynyyyyy
441712190189 yyynyyyyyYyyyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190243...

441712545950 yynyyEyynnnyyyynnn
441712565326 yyyyyYyyyyyyynnnnn
441712611290 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712613250 yyyyyNyyyyyyynyyyy
441712616023 y
441712626199 y
441712662563 y
441712671396 y
441712700618 y
441712706079 n
441712726653 n
441712734660 y
441712736421 y
441712748994 y
441712749630 y
441712765179 n
441712768633 n
441712780345 y
441712780504 n
441712784425 ynyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyn ...