uk.rec.bodybuilding
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.rec.bodybuilding only
 
Advanced search
December 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 48
45678910 49
11121314151617 50
18192021222324 51
25262728293031 52
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
uk.rec.bodybuilding Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...
 Up
  Happy New Year         


Author: Bully
Date: Dec 31, 2006 10:39

May you get what you deserve in 2007!

--
Bully
Protein bars: http://www.proteinbars.co.uk

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter,
and those who matter don't mind."
- Dr. Seuss
no comments
  Re: This is great         


Author: Zaf
Date: Dec 28, 2006 06:42

Bully wrote:
> Zaf wrote:
>> ericb wrote:
>>> Zaf wrote:
>>>> Some very good info here!!
>>>>
>>>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6529481301858251744&q=olympic+squat&hl=...
>>>>
>>>> Zaf
>>>>
>>>
>>> instantly im bemused that a room full of people have paid to see a
>>> bloke with a beer belly yaking and playing pully
>>>
>>> then again i havent watched it all :)
>>
>>
>> I am ashamed to say I didn't bother paying attention to most of what
>> Dan John wrote based on what he looked like.
> ...
Show full article (0.67Kb)
no comments
  Re: This is great         


Author: ericb
Date: Dec 28, 2006 04:43

Zaf wrote:

instantly im bemused that a room full of people have paid to see a bloke
with a beer belly yaking and playing pully

then again i havent watched it all :)

--
204@11%%
no comments
  HGH question         


Author: G
Date: Dec 26, 2006 12:22

Hi, i would like some practical advice on grouth hormone

is it worth taking?

what sort of dosage?

what to look for in pacaging in the uk?

what sort of pack they come in?

how to safely admister?

i would welcome any comments on this subject
5 Comments
  Re: Too old to get buffed?         


Author: Proctologically Violated©®
Date: Dec 24, 2006 08:59

"ranieri" wrote in message
news:q5CdnX9GfLrmNhPYnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Proctologically Violated
no comments
  Re: Too old to get buffed?         


Author:
Date: Dec 24, 2006 08:31

"Proctologically Violated
no comments
  Re: Too old to get buffed?         


Author: Proctologically Violated©®
Date: Dec 24, 2006 06:45

"Richard" wrote in message
news:5Sojh.35278$B42.674@newsfe12.phx...
> "DZ" <28508@3146231361.1693124558.26461.19325.29161> wrote in message
> news:10278@202812617.75521527.25320.12839.28069...
>> Richard wrote:
>>> John - while we're on this subject - what about the guys in the Nazi
>>> concentration camps who lost muscle and looked like skeletons. What are
> the
>>> chances that a guy like that could gain all his muscle back and more? I
> have
>>> never seen pictures of such transformations (from middle-aged and
>>> skinny
>>> into muscular). Anyone??
>>
>> "Lost" is different from "never had". It's easier to gain back muscle
>> lost through fasting.
>
> How is it different?
Show full article (1.37Kb)
no comments
  Re: Too old to get buffed?         


Author: Richard
Date: Dec 23, 2006 22:11

"JMW" enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:9k3so21j9d2tdc9njoeb2ojmmaiqpd7ht9@4ax.com...
> "Proctologically Violated
no comments
  Re: Too old to get buffed?         


Author: Richard
Date: Dec 23, 2006 22:11

"DZ" <28508@3146231361.1693124558.26461.19325.29161> wrote in message
news:10278@202812617.75521527.25320.12839.28069...
> Richard wrote:
>> John - while we're on this subject - what about the guys in the Nazi
>> concentration camps who lost muscle and looked like skeletons. What are
the
>> chances that a guy like that could gain all his muscle back and more? I
have
>> never seen pictures of such transformations (from middle-aged and skinny
>> into muscular). Anyone??
>
> "Lost" is different from "never had". It's easier to gain back muscle
> lost through fasting.

How is it different?
no comments
  Re: Too old to get buffed?         


Author: Proctologically Violated©®
Date: Dec 23, 2006 22:11

"JMW" enforcergraphics.f2s.com> wrote in message
news:9k3so21j9d2tdc9njoeb2ojmmaiqpd7ht9@4ax.com...
> "Proctologically Violated
no comments
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9