> On May 12, 9:37 pm, mimus hotmail.com> wrote:

>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 21:16:11 -0700, kixi wrote:

>>> On May 12, 8:57 pm, mimus hotmail.com> wrote:

>>

>>>> "Lebanese Intelligence sources tell me that a number of Hezbollah
>>>> terrorist fighters have been caught, over the weekend, and they cannot
>>>> speak Arabic, only Farsi.  They are Iranian and have identified themselves
>>>> or been identified by third parties as members of the Iranian
>>>> Revolutionary Guard."

>>

>>>> An odd story, since you'd think there were sufficient numbers of Hezbollah
>>>> fighters who survived the last Israeli "incident" to be veteran enough to
>>>> carry out the Lebanese campaign, and freed to do so by the Lebanese Army
>>>> and UNIFIL guarding their own homes in the South.

>>

>>>> And without further evidence-- like an identity parade for the world
>>>> press-- one has to wonder if the story isn't a fabrication intended to
>>>> finally bring some assistance to Lebanon, out of the desperation expressed
>>>> in the last paragraph:

>>

>>>> "Iran is expanding its temporary satellite state from South Lebanon to the
>>>> entire country.  Where is George Bush on this?  Nowhere to be seen."

>>

>>>> (Better to substitute "the Lebanese Army, the Arab League, the UN and the
>>>> United States" for "George Bush" in the above, to get the full remarkable
>>>> scope of the betrayal involved.)

>>

>>>>http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2008/05/iranian_citizen.php

>>

>>>> At least the non-Beiruti non-Hezbollah-aligned Druze have put up something
>>>> of a fight:

>>

>>>>http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2008/05/lebanons_300_he.php

>>

>>>> Apparently they're the only Lebanese who don't deserve to be slaves of the
>>>> mullahs of Iran.

>>

>>>> --

>>

>>>> It is usual on these occasions to make a great vapouring
>>>> about honour and conscience: but as those words are now
>>>> generally acknowledged to be utterly destitute of meaning,
>>>> I have too much respect for your understanding to say any
>>>> thing about them.

>>

>>>> < Peacock

>>

>>> I'm told there are many jews and Americans operating in Lebanon and
>>> that they cannot speak Arabic or Farsi. And I remember when the
>>> Lebanese Army destroyed the refugee camp last year, US transporters
>>> were photographed landing Beirut International with weapons. I guess
>>> that's OK.

>>
>> The "refugee camp" that put up a fight against the Lebanese Army--
>> admittedly hardly considerable one of the world's more bellicose
>> militaries, even before the recent disheartening turn of events, when it
>> refused to defend Lebanon-- for fifteen weeks, even after the civilian
>> population was evacuated, and which rocketed towns and villages all around
>> it?
>>
>> And the Lebanese Army that is, or at least was until a couple of days ago,
>> the Army of the Republic of Lebanon?
>>
>> Would you like to explain why a "refugee camp" on a foreign soil should be
>> crawling with fairly heavy weapons?
>>

>>> When Turkey launched attacks on Iraqi Kurdistan, they waited until
>>> Israel had sent the Turk army sophisticated weapons. I guess that's OK
>>> too.

>>
>> Kurds attack Turkey, Turkey counter-attacks.
>>
>> The only thing Iraq seems to be missing is some Druze.
>>

>>> I find it hilarious how the jewsmedia can report scornfully on Iran
>>> interfering in Iraq - their neighbour who waged war against Iran - but
>>> legitimize US occupation. Must be OK, I suppose.

>>
>> Overthrowing Saddam's regime was a good thing, even though the Bush
>> administration lied in various ways to bring on the war, not least by not
>> saying anything about their intention to do so during the 2000 US
>> Presidential campaign, and probably prior contacts with the "good friends"
>> of the "House of Bush", the "House of Saud", on the subject.
>>
>> As for it turning out that the Iraqis seem to have little national
>> patriotism, preferring to think and act along confessional lines,
>> resulting in them taking advantage of their wonderful opportunity to
>> rebuild their country to instead start murdering each other in the name
>> of God, I'm not sure it's fair to blame the Americans for that, although
>> it might be fair to blame them for not at least wondering a bit ahead of
>> time about any "nation-building" on the Sunni-Shiite Divide . . . .
>>
>> --
>>
>> Those who mean the best are many times misled
>> so far to the prejudice of those that trust them
>> as to leave them in a condition nearest to bondage
>> when they have thought they had brought them
>> into a way of freedom.

>
> Mimus wrote:
> "Overthrowing Saddam's regime was a good thing, even though the Bush
> administration lied in various ways to bring on the war,"
>
> It would be more truthful to say the jews lied. Jews in the media lied
> - most important isn't it for swaying public opinion. Jews in Israel
> lied - remember the non-existent uranium Saddam was getting from
> Niger.
>
> Almost all the Bush administration liars were jews. Take George Tenet,
> head of the CIA, as an example, He gave congress false intelligence
> crucial to justifying war. He resigned but within weeks he was guest
> of honour of the Zionist Organizarion of America. Where is he now? I
> bet he is not starving.