judicial-inc.biz wrote:

Ever wondered why it is, Christians are so happy to talk about the
institutional economy as binary logic of male and female copulation
idealised in marriage as 'the union of male and female to the exclusion
of all others voluntarily entered into for life'?

But that ternary logic requires something more than a discussion with
eunuchs and their understanding of a theoretical (TRINITARIAN:
dual-natured infinite potential manifested within the temporal as
instigated time) man and a coherent underlying philosophical reality or
substance, as opposed to attributes or that which lacks substance: "Who
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For
by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in
earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones [vRed: #365 (#41 -
Playing with Reversal/ Sameness in Difference) / #400 (#76 - Strength's
Warning Signs/ Revealers of Virtue)], or dominions [vBlue: #488 (#2 -
Contrast of Terms/ Self-Culture) / #396 (#72 - Self-Love/ Holding
Oneself Dear)], or principalities [vYellow: #364 (#40 - Reversal/
Avoiding Activity) / #380 (#56 - Abstruse Virtuosity/ Virtue of the
Mysterious)], or powers [vGreen: #361 (#37 - Non-Deeming Action/
Administration of Government) / #414 (#9 - Inconstancy of Achievement/
Practising Placidity)] all things were created by him, and for him:

http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/images/enneadgrapple.gif

And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is
the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn
from the dead; that in all things he might have the pre-eminence. For it
pleased the Father that in him should all fullness dwell; And, having
made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all
things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or
things in heaven.

And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked
works, [vCyan: #312 (#69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious) /
#435 (#30 - Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War)] yet now hath
he reconciled in the body of his flesh through death, to present you
holy and unblameable and unreproveable in his sight: If ye continue in
the faith grounded and settled, [vCoral: #381 (#57 - Laissez Faire
Politics/ Simplicity In Habits) / #442 (#37 - Non-Deeming Action/
Administration of Government)] and be not moved away from the hope of
the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every
creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister.
[vOrange: #407 (#2 - Contrast of Terms/ Self-Culture) / #260 (#17 -
Politics)]" [Colossians 1:15-23 (KJV)]

That this hypostatic mathematical and javascript semantical declaration
as function of governance which the many call religion has a default
Kabbalistic mathematical/chronological prime directive (of which you can
do nothing (participation may be voluntary) because it is part of the
software function intrinsic to being a homosapien) and also relates to
the theory of number, language, psych and soul.

GIZMO[zen][row][col] = {zone : {}, nous: [zone]}

var GIZMO = {

1 : {
1 : {
1 : {11 : {}, nous: [11]}, 2 : {18 : {}, nous: [18]}, 3 :
{13 : {}, nous: [13]},
4 : {74 : {}, nous: [74]}, 5 : {81 : {}, nous: [81]}, 6 :
{76 : {}, nous: [76]},
7 : {29 : {}, nous: [29]}, 8 : {36 : {}, nous: [36]}, 9 :
{31 : {}, nous: [31]}
},
2 : {
1 : {16 : {}, nous: [16]}, 2 : {14 : {}, nous: [14]}, 3 :
{12 : {}, nous: [12]},
4 : {79 : {}, nous: [79]}, 5 : {77 : {}, nous: [77]}, 6 :
{75 : {}, nous: [75]},
7 : {34 : {}, nous: [34]}, 8 : {32 : {}, nous: [32]}, 9 :
{30 : {}, nous: [30]}
},
…

}
}

Since this quote from [Colossians 1:15-23 (KJV)] was written in about 62
CE as 'Construing a Guide/ Practise Reason; I-Ching: H23 -
Disintegration; Tetra: #70 - Severence' relates to a preeminent Jewish
understanding of the celestial hierarchy as a function of Greco-Roman
Governance and to which the Magic Square of the time also corresponded.

We are talking about their claimed religious belief as Christian
identity being irrational, as a figment of their own self-delusion. That
is because one cannot get a rational explanation from them for that
belief. I say again, by your own admission: 'things based on faith which
cannot be explained rationally', any dialog with you on religious
values, identity and obligations by the Roman Catholic Church towards
any recognition of the autonomic right to regulative free-will is
irrational and incommensurate.

That in the absence of a teleological statement of belief which is
compliant with the sovereign autonomic right of being a citizen of state
and participant in its function of governance as regulative free-will,
the foolish seem to be so ready to agree:

Jeff (Jeff Hickling aka 1stCenturyApostolic@Traditionalist.com): “There
used to be a professing Sodomite encourager who went by the name of Dolf
who was heavily into Aids, anyone heard about him lately?”

“Take heed unto thyself, and the doctrines; continue in them: for in
doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.” [1
Timothy 4:16 (KJV)]

Guardian Snow (aka phoenixhasrisen@yahoo.com.au /
snowpheonix@eck.net.au): “He seems to have really taken an interest in
me. Should I be concerned?”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Dolf lives in
Australia, is a gay activist, very much into kabbalah/gematria, probably
a genius, difficult to understand unless you have a background in
kabbalah/gematria, looney.

Why should you be concerned? (LOL) He probably thinks you understand
him. If I were you I wouldn't worry about him.”

Super: #31 - Military Strategies as Guides/ Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Endurance; Tetra: #51 - Constancy, Ego: #37 - Non-Deeming Action/
Administration of Government; I-Ching: H40 - Deliverance; Tetra: #21 -
Release, Nuance: #21 - Guiding and the Physical/ Emptying the Heart;
I-Ching: H31 - Influence; Tetra: #42 - Going to Meet

.Understanding: Male Idea: #164 has 0 Categories.
--- n. "Small".
--- outer; civil (profane).
--- dainty (of food).
--- knowledge, understanding
--- to cut or hew.

Female Idea: #102 has 0 Categories.
--- firmness; security; faithfulness.
--- to eat greedily, to swallow down; to destroy utterly.
--- the space between two hosts (armies); sons.
--- possession, control; property; Baal; Lord; to marry, to be
husband; master; to rule; to reject or despise.
--- n. "Pleasantness".
--- n. "Bright".
--- n. "Flowing", "Melting"; "Lent Succor by God".
--- to shine, to be splendid.
--- to set, establish; to be set, firm, sure.
--- to sport or jest.
--- precious or costly things.
--- a circle (of persons sitting in company); round about.
--- servant or worshipper of Yahweh.
--- to swell, to rise up.
--- to prevail.

Guardian Snow: “I'm not, but it doesn't hurt to ask questions. Somebody
seemed interested enough to mention him.”

“Beliefs have the power to create and the power to destroy. Human beings
have the awesome ability to take any experience of their lives and
create a meaning that dis-empowers them or one that can literally save
their lives.” [Tony Robbins]

Guardian Snow: “I still don't understand. Sorry.”

"Answerest thou nothing? what is it which these witness against thee?
But he held his peace, and answered nothing."

Guardian Snow: "Your entitled to your opinion and your judgments of me
do not define me, they define you. I do not feel I have wronged you, so
don't hold your breath waiting for me to apologize."

"Again the high priest asked him, and said unto him, Art thou the
Christ, the Son of the Blessed?"

Guardian Snow: "The Good News of (Hebrew: Jeshua) Messiah is about
righteous behaviour and not condemnation which you have already put
forward. I was honest with you and you've already labelled me a
'fa[s]cist' when I stated that I respect your point of view."

"And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the
right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. Then the high
priest rent his clothes, and saith, What need we any further witnesses?
Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye?"

Guardian Snow: "You stated I was, 'sprouting nonsense' when I attempted
to point out scriptures. Your cut and paste rant makes no sense to me
still and maybe you should work on making it less about an accusation
and more clear. I really don't understand a single thing your talking
about."

"And they all condemned him to be guilty of death. And some began to
spit on him, and to cover his face, and to buffet him, and to say unto
him, Prophesy: and the servants did strike him with the palms of their
hands." [Mark 14:60-65]

“'Men have forgotten this truth,' said the fox. 'But you must not forget
it. You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.' And now
here is my secret, a very simple secret; it is only with the heart that
one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye.”
[Antoine de Saint-Exupery]

Jani (jani@jani.adsl24.co.uk): “Jeff's done this before; he seems very
disappointed to learn that gay posters are still around, and not burning
in fundie hellfire.”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Sometimes I get
the feeling Jeff is a divorced closet case. I think it's sad that so
many ‘fundies’ are so self righteously pretentious that they miss that
we are *all* sinners in one way or another, and they go about pointing
fingers and condemning others while either ignoring or excusing their
own shortcomings.

Heck, it's not only sad, it's down right dangerous. Fundamentalist
extremists of any flavor are the type of people who can justify witch
burnings, abortion clinic bombings, the beheading of infidels, and the
murder of their own sons and daughters to appease their ‘God’, religious
leaders, and similarly minded peers.

After all, us heretics and deviants from the norm are only ‘dogs’ to
them. The thing is, I'm kind to dogs (unless they're trying to bite me
;) Dogs are innocent even when they poop on your Persian rug, they don't
know any better. Wasn't it Jesus who said: "Father forgive them for they
know not what they do"?

Unfortunately all those fundie extremists do know what they do. They
just don't care 'cause they can rationalize doing anything as long as
they can claim they do it in God's name (in vain...) Regards”

dolf: “Are the Convicted Muslim Terrorists any Different to the Kelly
Gang? The Irish as Roman Catholics are a class consciousness of social
exclusion, hatred, thieving from non-believers and of killing them.
That Irish Roman Catholics aren't capable of loyalty to State. From the
appearance of their deportment and persona portrayed within newspaper
photograph.”

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com: “yeah...one lot represented an irish
underclass conscious of its social exclusion, the other represents a
religion obsessed with thieving from non-believers and killing them in
accordance with a loopy literal interpretation of a religious text based
on the sayings and doings of an illiterate 6th-century mass-murdering
paedophile.”

dolf: “Both involve a quest for the sovereign autonomic identity.”

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com: “Bullshit. The Kellys were British citizens
who wanted equal treatment same as what their relatives in Ireland were
struggling for, not separate treatment.

The leb muslim scumbags want separate treatment - in accordance with
their putrid middle-ages religion - for believers and non-believers.”

dolf: “In the case of the Kelly gang it was Irish nationalism against
the State imperative of a police force.”

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com: “Rubbish. Irish nationalism was the enabling
factor which allowed them to be conscious of their lack of equal
treatment in British society, prompting their revolt against unjust rule.

There was absolutely no quest for ‘sovereign autonomy’ - quite the
opposite. The irish were over-represented in all facets of the culture
of the British Empire (except police and prison warders where those dour
sour-puss scots ruled the roost (and still do)) because they embraced it
as a tool of inclusion.”

dolf: “In the Islamic sense the entry (navel) point into this world of
the human psych and spiritual reality is name the of Allah as Islamic
name for God as YHWH--and this is concealed by the transition from 22
letters of the Semitic script to the 28 letters of the Arabic script in
the Koran.”

true.blue.bluey@gmail.com: “Utter gibberish. True to form, Dolt.”

dolf: “You can rationalize doing anything as long as they can claim they
do it in God's name (in vain...)

That I have had a conversation with the Jewish Rabbi to the Strathfield
Synagogue with respects to religious, racial and sexual vilification
engaged in by Polly the Parrot flatulantdingo, dogfart who was on 26
March 2008 a member of the Strathfield Synagogue situated at 19 Florence
Street, Strathfield Sydney--That without exception, Australian Jews on
the question of marriage rights are no different to German Fascism.

The making of Australian History will occur this Sunday 22 September
2008 with the first same-sex marriage ceremony derived from traditional
Jewish Orthodoxy to be blessed and officiated by a rabbi in the Emanuel
synagogue with the authority of the Progressive Jewish Council.

You could try telephoning the synagogue on the Sabbath day if you wish
to do it in God's name (in vain...)”

Please cease using the name Dolf, as that name and all who are connected
to it, are dead to me (unless I tell you otherwise). I originally
changed my name because of religious and human rights vilifcation by the
Victoria Police. And now because I have had to change it again for the
second time, I will be pursuing without compassion my legal claim of
human and Constitutional Rights violations by Australians such as
you--who likewise falsely claim piety.

I have by defining a hypostatic mathematical and javascript semantical
declaration as function of governance, which the many call religion due
to its default Kabbalistic mathematical/chronological prime directive
(of which you can do nothing (participation may be voluntary) because it
is part of the software function intrinsic to being a homosapien) and
also relates to the theory of number, language, psych and soul.

Supplied a teleological statement of religious, institutional and
organisational belief which is compliant with the sovereign autonomic
right of being a citizen of state and participant in its function of
governance as regulative free-will.”

Raymond: “Seems like you need to get out and get a job, no one has to
show you anything, you reap what you sow, such silly demands are just
that silly.”

dolf: “And I intend to use this teleological statement of belief
associated to #237 - USE OF FORCE, to pursue a human rights claim
against the Victoria Police and the State of Victoria for persecution as
violation of religious, racial and sexual human rights through a culture
of claimed piety and fascist conduct by Australians who's self indulgent
nationalism is hardly virtuous and representative of the cultural
reality that Australia is a Dutch possession colonised by the British
according to a Genesis Principle and Letters Patent of 1900 to the
Commonwealth of 1901.

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “What, me pious?
Not me. Pray tell, by what name should we refer to you? BTW, in case you
didn't read the numbers, i was defending your right to be as crazy as
you like w/o your being slammed because of it.

But if you prefer I'll give you grief about taking some of my past posts
and violating US copyright laws by re-posting them in my name all over
the internet just so that you could reply to them without having to deal
with my input.

What, you thought I didn't know what you've been up to?

If you're going to claim the Victoria police vilifies your human rights
perhaps you should first try being civil and refrain from violating
other's rights, by respecting the law yourself.

In any case, i am glad nobody has bashed your head in yet, Flod. Add
that up.”

dolf: “Similarly then appreciate that the short name 'Dolf' for an
individual Dolf Boek who is mentioned in the Victoria Police Gazette
around July 1987 and was at the time, under the instrumentality of the
31 October 1986 amendments to the Birth, Death and Marriages
Registration Act.

That the claimed loss of identity as autonomic right to regulative free
will as Intellectual Property, and this being due to persistent
religious, racial and sexual vilification as culture of persecution is
set against the authority as effective force, to have had that name
comes from, individual action as expression of autonomic regulative free
will given assent by gazetted police and legislative authority.

We're talking about a despicable Victoria Police here.

It was their use of force which saw the rational in conducting the Tasty
Raid by systematically strip searching over 400 patrons in the 7 August
1994 incident of the Tasty Raid at the Commerce Club in Flinders Lane,
Melbourne, Victoria.

Next, given this theory of progressive substantive justification
concerning inner city zones which have a culture of heterosexist antagonism.

They'll strip search these males in public for commercial opportunism on
television (news).

And also, I wish to make it abundantly clear, that on each occasion I
have lodged a complaint against the Insurer AXA Group, I have been
subject to detriment.

My concern is that the Insurer and their representatives have made
unauthorized and unwanted intrusions into all aspects of my life.

That I have engaged in discourse on predominantly religious newsgroups
and in so doing may or may not have been subject to unauthorized and
unwanted intrusions the Insurer and their representatives.

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Is that medical
insurance?”

dolf: “That such conduct by the Insurer and their representatives
constitutes a violation of my state and Constitutional autonomic rights
to intellectual property and free-will.

That the categorical refusal by Mr Andrew Penn as Chief Executive
Officer and Mr Elio Garino as Manager Financial Operations by the
Insurer to administer a contract which is unlawful, unconstitutional and
fascist in character--is because of their disrespect to State.

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): 'I want to point
out that I do not ‘see’ Chris Ho-Stuart, and that this conversation was
originally posted to alt.bible.prophecy *only*, and that
alt.politics.homosexuality, aus.politics,
aus.religion.christian were added to the tag by Mr. Telos or Qolon or
whatever. I am opposed to cross-posting, and part of the problem here is
precisely the cross-posting by homosexual groups spamming their agenda
irrespectful of the groups which they are spamming to." [Gay Manifesto
-- repost, 1821 hours 28 July 2003]

dolf: “I believe that I've expressed my gratitude to Bill Heidrick for
his Qabalah Gematria Ideas Dictionary, beyond that is there anything
else you wanted to say?”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Undoubtedly. But
keep your head, Flod. Don't be hasty, not
everyone is Tasty.

Just because we're binary and I've antagonized the cause doesn't mean
I'm out to get you, because. A couple of repetitions don't establish a
trend The pattern is lame it can mend

Victoria, Victoria, what a pretty name" [1103 hours 19 September 2008]

Dixie_Chickie: “No, you are a bigot and a FLAMER. Your obsession with
homosexuality is duly noted. After all, YOU R THE ONE WHO STARTED this
silly thread. It's your MO. FLAME and then feign blame on those who call
you on your bigotry.

prop·a·gan·da
1.The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information
reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine
or cause.

2.Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or
cause: wartime propaganda." 12:38 am 30 July 2008]

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “You seem to
poorly have moderately changed your mind about my soul's fate, or why
then the admonishment? It's not as expensively clear as you thought? How
I climb a tree or reach it's fruit is given me to lightly be by wilful
choice... As you may expect as how I wield my sword, do not widely think
that I am here to teach

True, seedlings in poor soil will wilt of themselves, I care not if my
beliefs are questioned, but that my words will startle those who would
notoriously be personally seduced by wilt in seedlings, out of their
stupor, and promptly cut and modestly pull the weeds from His Garden

You didn't answer my question. 777,3,1 baba (no dis, this time)" [Gay
Manifesto: repost 1836 hours 27 July 2003]

dolf: “With such notions as "I am a mirror", "rug", "Persian", "evil",
and "#237 - use of force" that I feel the equivalent categories of
understanding as dynamic natural associators to BABA DADA's actions are:
#246 and #351 of Nous #70 :

#237 / #69 Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious
#246 / #9 Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising Placidity
#316 / #70 Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand
#351 / #35 Great Guiding Signs?/ Virtue of Benevolence

That one can see from your '777,3,1' that you are irrationally connected
with Crowley's Kabbalah Magik Number and Astrological Mysticism, and
driven by a bigoted gay agenda as dogmatic pretence: "After all, us
heretics and deviants from the norm are only 'dogs' to them. The thing
is, I'm kind to dogs (unless they're trying to bite me ;) Dogs are
innocent even when they poop on your Persian rug, they don't know any
better. Wasn't it Jesus who said: ‘Father forgive them for they
know not what they do’?" [BABA DADA]

Raphael Israeli, a professor of Islamic, Middle East and Chinese history
at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem commenting on this conduct of
intimidation and closing down of any rational dialogue as being a
cowardice which is the province of Muslim apologists: "As [...] one
becomes used to the bias of the world's media and the frustrations of
being misrepresented in the face of hysteria. But as a visiting academic
to the land of the fair go, I didn't expect to find the same thing here.
Some, of course, prefer to hide behind hollow slogans of "inter-communal
harmony", "inter-faith co-operation" and "multiculturalism" instead of
exposing Muslim violence and inflammatory rhetoric and act, together
with Muslim moderates, to uproot these phenomena.

Aware of the European parallel, I am neither surprised by the Muslim
leaders' attempts to shut off any debate in Australia and intimidate
anyone who raises his voice against such actions, nor by the Australian
press complicity in that process. Only yesterday I received threats from
a Chechen Islamic website. So much for civilised debate." [Copyright and
Courtesy The Australian Newspaper 22 February 2007, Opinion, p 10]

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Sir, But you
would have me stand by while the homosexual
proselytizers of the "gay" agenda,who represent only the "gay" lobby,
turn a forum for the discussion of Bible Prophecy into a platform for
their perverse propaganda. Are you saying that "you're not disposed to
anarchy", but you're conditionally tolerant of it? An oxymoronic
criteria, don't you think?

The "merit(s)" of my "Christianity" is relative to "Christ's" criteria,
not your apparently variable concept of adherence to *your* "Christian"
values.

Indeed I serve the principles of Democratic responsibility, and my call
is to truth and against political and religious anarchy masquerading as
"human rights" and social justice.

I slander or defame no one, rather my exposure of the truth is vilified,
and I'm falsely accused.

My sin is that I do not turn the cheek. That is between me and my
creator. I seek not to, rationalize my behavior or excuse it by
misquoting the Bible nor hiding behind His Grace. Neither do I presume
to dictate how you or anyone should express their religious adherence...

Your weak comparison of Hitler's Nuremberg Laws with either
Fundamentalist perspective or my exposure of homosexual propaganda as
such is typical of homosexual apologists and *prescribed* by the very
"spinners" I discuss in the article for which it is apparently ok to
demonstrate behavior unbecoming a Christian while claiming
"Christianity" If I told you I was a Muslim or a Jew, what would you say?

My right to express myself in this newsgroup, to expose religious
pretentiousness and political deviousness, and even to insult those who
insult me would be the same. How would you judge me then? But more
importantly, would you also judge those who call me bigot when in fact
I'm not, and "judged" so because I point to Leviticus? Do you now?

As for:
"1 - Ended the right of Jews to marry freely
2 - Ended the right of Jews to have sexual intercourse freely
3 - Ended the right of Jews to employ or be employed freely
4 - Ended the right of Jews to display/serve the nation's flag freely"

Please, doesn't your version of "Christianity" permit you to understand
that:

1. Homosexuals don't have the right to marry. That right is for
heterosexuals, man and woman. Homosexuals are demanding that your social
institutions change in order to accommodate their abnormal sexual behavior.

2.Heterosexuals "generally" have no interest in restricting "gays" from
having sex. We would just prefer that they do it privately.

3.I don't object to anybody working, but I don't want to *have to* hire
someone *because* they're "gay".

I don't even mind if my son's teacher is "gay", I mind mandatory "sexual
awareness" classes in elementary school because someone in the "gay
lobby" pressured the school board to be "politically correct".

4. Hey if they want to fly "rainbow" flags or Jolly Rogers, be my guest,
who cares? As long as the rainbow doesn't replace Old Glory here or in
your case the Aussie Union Jack...the problem is, that is what "they're"
up to.

I'm certain you will find that if I'm approached with civility, it is
with civility I will respond. One may disagree without insults or
ridicule. I am a mirror. If an "outed" homosexual comes to
alt.bible.prophecy to discuss prophecy, I would be the first to defend
his or her right to participate. However, if a "gay" comes to
proselytize his sexual behavior, I object as I would your discussing
yours or Pythagoras's.

If upon declaring the falsehood of their statements I am ridiculed or my
religious and political views are labeled bigotry, I will not only
attack, but I will disregard my attacker's civility, with interest.

I've just been perusing your *poorly* designed web site...interesting.
And *you* dare call yourself a "Christian"...LOL

I'm sure I'll check it out some more, my wordy detractor, but perhaps
you could explain (in terms a "jackass" like me can understand) why you
call it "The Sodomite Prophecy"?" [Baba Dada’s Gay Manifesto, 1355 hours
28 July 2003]

Nous: 70
Time:
Date:
Torah: #40 #50 #100
Tao: Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand
I-Ching: H53 - Gradual Progress
Tetra: #14 - Penetration

Latin: Custos {God who supports & maintains all things} Alt: Michael
{Who is as God?, Tutelary Prince of Israel, Angel of repentance} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST & HEALS EPILEPSY, ALSO CALMS ANGER
2. VEGETATION, AQUATIC ANIMALS
3. SLEEP & DREAMS
4. Terisatras
}
Super-ego (male)
#26 #26 Ambiguous Reversals/ Virtue of Gravity
#31 #5 Natural Guidance/ Function of Emptiness
#49 #18 Origin of Ethical Concepts/ Palliation of Vulgarity
#55 #6 Superiority of the Female/ Completion of Form
#130 #75 Destructiveness of Envy/ Harmed Through Greed
#133 #3 Prescriptions for Politics/ Keeping the People Quiet
#206 #73 Employing Deeming/ Daring to Act
#233 #27 Paradoxes of the Greatest Skill/ Function of Skill
#285 #52 So What?/ Returning to the Origin

11 Categories
#1 #4 #200 #70 #10 n. Strong --- name of cities in Batanea and in
Nephtali.
#1 #200 #80 #4 n. Border
#4 #20 #200 #50 #10 #1 The records
#10 #70 #200 #5 n. Bare; forest, wild honey, honeycomb
#40 #40 #200 #5 For bitterness
#40 #200 #40 #5 Deceit or fraud; n. Fraud
#50 #20 #200 #10 #5 A strange woman (i.e. harlot)
#50 #4 #10 #2 #5 #200 #6 #8 A willing or ready spirit; liberal; princely
#5 #70 #10 #200 The city
#70 #200 #10 #5 Nakedness

Ego (female)
#26 #26 Ambiguous Reversals/ Virtue of Gravity
#86 #60 Skill at Ruling/ How to Maintain One's Place
#99 #13 Status/ Loathing Shame
#168 #69 Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious
#237 #69 Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious
#246 #9 Inconstancy of Achievement/ Practising Placidity
#316 #70 Difficulty in Knowing How/ Difficult to Understand
#351 #35 Great Guiding Signs?/ Virtue of Benevolence
#376 #25 What's behind it all?/ Imaging the Mysterious

10 Categories
#40 #40 #70 #20 #5 #1 #200 Low-land Syria
#20 #6 #300 #50 n. Swarthland --- eastern Africa and/or Ethiopia
#50 #90 #8 #10 #50 #20 #50 #90 #8 For ever and ever
#200 #60 #10 #50 #10 #50 #4 #2 Wilderness of Sinai (the desert around
Mt. Sinai)
#40 #300 #1 #30 #5 Request
#50 #70 #6 #200 #10 #40 Youth or childhood (figuratively of the early
times of a nation)
#70 #6 #300 To hasten or hurry
#70 #6 #300 To collect or gather
#70 #300 #6 n. Hairy, Essau the son of Isaac

http://www.grapple.id.au/angels.html?nous=770

dolf: “Other than to make a retreat into obscurantism or fideism with
regards to clearly explaining the chronological imperative conveyed by
the Constitution of Freemasons of 1723 AD (5723 Year of Masonry), it is
simply impossible to make an oath to ‘Almighty God’ as the supreme being
of the Bible, without regard for its cosmology and cosmogony as the
product of the Mind of such supreme being that is conveyed by the
teleological equation: Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c2 [9(92+1)/2]

The religious belief system semantics (22/7) as Natural and Common Law
right that is conveyed by this paradigm are sustained by Hebrew
categories of understanding applied to Milesian ordinals: #250, #270,
#335, #364. By that I mean there is a relationship between the base-7
chronology of the 364 day year expressed by 3W1D and the topical solar
year convey by 6000 years = 122J3W1D.

Karl Barth's (1886-1968) inability to adequately answer the question,
"For how can the mystery of God be captured through the formulae of any
humanly-conceived master plan?", caused him to problematized the
'worldviews' associated to Natural Theology because he opposed turning
any of them into a premature 'foundation' for thinking about the divine
mystery.

The Dynamic Natural Association (DNA) is obtained, as the product of a
dialectic traversal through specifically related to a nous conceptual
zone on each plane, as linkages within the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON.
And from this a Category of the Understanding is obtained in relation to
the id's Ego (#), Telos (sum #), and Super (sum mod 81) values as the
essential character of the perceptions, actions and statements within
space and time, which are not simply concepts, but forms of sensibility
that are necessary conditions for any possible experience.”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Your fundie fun
house has the above as: a refusal to allow themselves to be in the least
disconcerted when confronted with the true nature of their
fundamentalist religion

See where you ran when and confronted together? That's 'QUE'”

dolf: “Therefore the reason those pro-fascist comments are being
expressed, in the balance of probabilities, is because he has empathies
with Kabbalah of the Golden Dawn or Freemasonry and has no valid
Teleological Argument and Cosmological Anthropic Principle to
substantiate the Masonary Year of 6000, which according to the
Constitution of Freemasons of 1723 AD assigned to such date the 5723rd
Year of Masonry--as a cult of Christ-murderers {ie. the Grand Master
Hiram Abiff is murdered by three ruffians--perverted thought, uncurbed
emotions and destructive actions}. I'll first discuss how this Divine
paradigm of mind Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D] + c2˜ [9(92˜+1)/2] might
be deployed for smarter buildings and then respond further to him

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Flod, If you're
going to quote me, quote *me* and clearly distinguish what I said from
what you add.

Also, please refrain from re-posting my posts to forums to which I did
not originally post them.

As I've said, I have no problems with your or anybody's sexuality, or
your desire to defend your right to exist. My problem is when in your
(collective) enthusiasm you (collectively) try to impose your agenda on
how I exist.

Now, don't you have a parking place in front of a place of business to
go fight for? A wedding to attend? Swish along, nothing to see here…”

Barry OGrady: “How dare you be nice to Dolf and try to help him? From
now on you must call him Dolt out of respect for his mental state.”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Truly spoken.
By now you may've seen where (alt.bible.prophecy and
alt.christnet.christianlife - I think you're posting from
aus.religion.christian) little Dolt has swished himself up into a hussy
fit and called me a fascist c*nt and all kinds of other goodies he
must've found in his gematria
dictionary.

I must be getting old to keep trying to be fair to people like him. You
and Marx (not Groucho, but maybe Harpo) are probably right, Barry.
Religion is the opiate of the masses. But I'm beginning to think I'd
rather have some real opium, I dislike flowery incense, it only covers
up the stench of hypocrisy...;-)”

dolf: “Have I quoted you and portrayed you correctly as a lying,
deceitful, evil fascist cunt?”

Mark Latham (ex_labor_voter@only.idiots.vote.labor.com): “Unfortunately
it doesn't take long for Dolt's insanity to shine through.”

dolf: “"777 and other Qabalistic Writings of Aleister Crowley" (c) 1912,
1955 Ordo Templi Orientis ISBN 0-87728-670-1

Blurb: "This collection of Qabalistic texts is without parallel in the
history of mystical literature. Edited and introduced by Dr. Israel
Regardie, the three texts included are Gematria, 777, and Sepher Sephiroth."

Sure if the individual wishes to rationally discuss the subject, I'm
familiar with it an I've associated Bill Heidrick's categories of
understanding (as I will with Richard Amiel McGough's keying of
equivalent information to Strong's number of the Bible's Hebrew / Greek
Concordance) to the vMeme / Moment Kabbalistic Cube as noumenon.

http://www.grapple.id.au/kabbalah/grappleIcon.html?vMode=0.1.3.2&vExpand=4.5.8.9

To understand institutional, organisational and guild theory of early
Australian development (including the labor movement) one must have a
regard for the 100 year Memorial Capstone of Royal Arch Freemasons
Australia dated 30 May, 1999, Hotel Sofitel, 25 Collins Street,
Melbourne. See this URL for details on Benefit Societies and Freemasons
in Labour History:

http://www.takver.com/history/tragedy.htm”

Abu nadal (abu nadal@tmnet.net.my): “How does John Howard sleep at
night? How does all his minions live with such treatment dished out to
these people? How do they live with their conscience?”

Mark Latham (ex_labor_voter@only.idiots.vote.labor.com): “Care to
explain WTF you are prattling on about?”

bringyagrogalong (sofala@aapt.net.au): “It's called history, you drongo.
I know you can't afford to buy any books but that's no fucking excuse,
go down to the local library.”

Dolf: “Mark Latham has trouble with books.”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “None of the
above. Unfortunately your unique perspective as a sick pup and your need
to defend yourself from imaginary foes undoubtedly clouds your
understanding and perception of the truth in my words.

As a result you attack me even though this dialog began as my attempt to
defend you from Jeff's insults and a reassurance to Snow that you
presented no threat to him. (other than subjecting him to the usual
nonsensical gibberish which you typically spout as a result of your
misunderstanding of gematria..)

Is it any wonder then, that the heterosexual world as a whole will
continue to reject your (collective)advances? If you indeed represent
homosexuals then your very own words condemn you. You don't want to
establish a dialog you demand to be worshipped and allowed to park where
you please. Swish along now Dolfy, nothing here to compute.”

Camper-traveller (NO POSTING HISTORY / darlene5656@live.com.au): “Hey
guys, whats with the verbals & hissy-fits. Get on with the discussion &
leave the insults out of it”

baba (aka bbdd@terra.spoof.net / ramdum7@inorbit.com): “Oops, forgot the
disclaimer...

Disclaimer: The above is this writer's opinion and in no way claims to
describe the views of other participants in this newsgroup, or the
author's Internet and Usenet provider. The author represents only
himself, is not affiliated with any particular group or denomination,
and as such makes no claims as to the veracity of his statements or
their consistency with the opinions and/or scriptural interpretations of
any religion or religious organization. Furthermore, while it is not the
author's intent to defraud, deceive, or insult the intelligence or
character of the reader, the author will not accept liability or
responsibility of any kind for any damages (monetary, moral, or
otherwise) incurred by the reader as a result of reading this post. The
author wishes to point out that remedial procedures to block offensive
posts from the reader are built in to your news reader, and recommends
their usage should the writer's material be considered offensive in any
manner.

Moreover, the above Usenet post is copyrighted by the author, and must
not be edited for re-posting in anyway without the express written
consent of the author, unless the editing is done solely for brevity by
a replicant to this and only this post or an immediate thread thereof. ©
2003”

And is claimed piety and fascist conduct by Australians et al, and who's
self indulgent nationalism is hardly virtuous and representative of the
cultural reality that Australia is a Dutch possession colonised by the
British according to a Genesis Principle and Letters Patent of 1900 to
the Commonwealth of 1901.

- dolf
- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/missionAccomplished.html