|
|
 Up |
|
  |
|
|
|
Author: Dr QuiteDr Quite Date: Sep 16, 2008 12:17
Colombia cleaner than Germany?
Could be true.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: GerritGerrit Date: Sep 16, 2008 16:54
OK - how do you read the graph?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: GazGaz Date: Sep 16, 2008 16:56
George C. Looney wrote:
Actually, if you look at the methodology, its highly based around economic
activity. Countries like the Germany and France do worse then Switzerland
because they actually 'produce' things, and the irony of Norway being top,
when its busy shipping all that oil to the rest of the planet.
Gaz
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: GazGaz Date: Sep 16, 2008 16:56
Dr Quite wrote:
>
> Colombia cleaner than Germany?
>
> Could be true.
But it isnt. In the same way that Chinas human rights records are not the
same as the USA.
Gaz
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: George C. LooneyGeorge C. Looney Date: Sep 16, 2008 17:31
On 16 Sep, 16:54, "Gerrit" wrote:
>
> OK - how do you read the graph?
I was surprised that Belgium was worse than the UK, since we recycle a
lot more, but that is only one criteria.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AZ NomadAZ Nomad Date: Sep 16, 2008 18:13
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:54:19 +0800, Gerrit wrote:
>OK - how do you read the graph?
read the fucking article.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: GazGaz Date: Sep 16, 2008 19:02
George C. Looney wrote:
> On 16 Sep, 16:54, "Gerrit" wrote:
>>
>> OK - how do you read the graph?
>
> I was surprised that Belgium was worse than the UK, since we recycle a
> lot more, but that is only one criteria.
But its a load of crap though, i mean really. It's sixth form stuff for the
tabloids.
Gaz
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
Author: Runge12Runge12 Date: Sep 16, 2008 21:19
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Alan SAlan S Date: Sep 17, 2008 00:38
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:56:04 +0100, "Gaz" msn.com>
wrote:
>George C. Looney wrote:
>
>Actually, if you look at the methodology, its highly based around economic
>activity. Countries like the Germany and France do worse then Switzerland
>because they actually 'produce' things, and the irony of Norway being top,
>when its busy shipping all that oil to the rest of the planet.
>
>Gaz
Yep. It's a nonsense, particularly when you look at things
per country, which is the real effect on the environment,
rather than per capita.
Cheers, Alan, Australia
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
