Re: Drugs classification should be scrapped, experts say
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.politics.misc only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Drugs classification should be scrapped, experts say         

Group: uk.politics.misc · Group Profile
Author: Andy
Date: Sep 23, 2008 13:27

On 23 Sep, 10:20, Dr John Watson NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote:
> I'm looking forward to reading what the Dourly Moral will have to say
> about this.
>
> Drugs classification should be scrapped, experts say
>
> A leading think-tank has called for the Government’s system of drugs
> classification to be scrapped.
>
> By Christopher Hope, Home Affairs Editor Last Updated: 8:26PM BST 22 Sep
> 2008
>
> The UK Drugs Policy Commission says classifying illegal drugs on a
> “danger scale” of classes A, B or C needs to be overhauled because
> they do not affect drug use.
>
> The news comes ahead of a meeting this Friday when the Home Office’s
> independent Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs will discuss whether
> to downgrade ecstasy from class A.
>
> Ecstasy remains the third most popular illicit drug in Britain, with five
> per cent of young adults aged 16 to 24 saying they have used it in the
> last year.
>
> The council, which is made up of 21 academics and drugs experts, provides
> advice to Governments on illegal drug use and is expected to recommend
> downgrading the drug from A to B.
>
> Reports from the Police Foundation in 2000, the Commons Home Affairs
> Committee in 2002 and the Commons Science and Technology Committee in 2006
> have all favoured the move.
>
> However the Commission warned the council in a submission that Home
> Secretary Jacqui Smith is likely to over-rule any decision to downgrade,
> in a re-run of the row over cannabis earlier this year.
>
> Then, the council's recommendation that cannabis should remain a class C
> drug was ignored by Miss Smith who decided to reclassify the drug on
> health grounds.
>
> The Commission says: “The UKDPC does not want to second-guess the
> council’s final conclusions about ecstasy. However were it to recommend
> a lower classification then it is not unreasonable to anticipate a
> political response to that with cannabis.”
>
> The Commission was heavily critical of what it describes as the
> “increased polticisation” of drugs’ classification.
>
> Roger Howard, Chief Executive, UK Drug Policy Commission, told The Daily
> Telegraph yesterday: “The purpose and operation of the drug
> classification system has become increasingly confused amongst politicians
> and the public in recent years.
>
> “The time has come for an independent wholesale review of the system to
> clarify how a scientific rating of drug harms should be used for drug
> classifications and for wider applications such as setting policing
> priorities or public health messages.”
>
> Members of the commission include the chairman Dame Ruth Runciman, a
> former council member who chaired a Police Foundation inquiry which argued
> for ecstasy to be moved to class B seven years ago, Professor Colin
> Blakemore, the former chief executive of the Medical Research Council and
> David Blakey, a former Chief Constable and HM inspector of constabulary.
>
> The council is expected to make its decision on ecstasy next year.
>
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/30620...
>
> --
> Dr John Watson
> Baker Street

From a physical health viewpoint, the most dangerous drug is tobacco,
from a mental health viewpoint, the most dangerous drug is alcohol.
This makes a mockery of the whole system, which belongs in the dustbin
of history along with apartheid and the Berlin wall.

Legalise the lot. Tax it, and use the proceeds to provide decent rehab
(including vastly improved psychiatric hospitals and prisons) and
temperance schemes. Put the rest of the cash into extra-curricular
activities for kids, ranging from football to chess and flower-
arranging (the best way to keep youths out of all forms of trouble is
to ensure they are gainfully occupied)

Never understood why their is a law against possession of personal
quantities of drugs. The mental health act allows for people whose
drug use presents a danger to themselves or others to be sectioned and
detoxified anyway. It's a psychiatric and psychological issue, not a
moral one.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!