|
|
Up |
|
  |
Author: Dr John WatsonDr John Watson Date: Apr 29, 2008 09:46
Gordon Brown's decision to overturn the advice of his own group of drug
experts by pressing ahead with a tougher policy on cannabis could face a
high court challenge from campaigners.
As the report from the 23-strong Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs
(ACMD) recommending that cannabis should remain a class C drug was
delivered yesterday to the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, it was widely
reported that Gordon Brown would ignore its findings.
"Whitehall sources" were reported as indicating that the prime minister
would formally respond to their report after the local elections next
week.
"Mr Brown has made clear that, notwithstanding the scientific evidence,
there are other considerations," a Whitehall source was quoted as saying.
"These include expressing concern about the involvement of serious crime
in the cannabis trade and sending a signal, as a government and as a
society, that this drug is a danger to health."
|
| Show full article (3.91Kb) |
|
| | 28 Comments |
|
  |
Author: AndyAndy Date: Apr 29, 2008 10:35
On 29 Apr, 08:46, Dr John Watson NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote:
> Gordon Brown's decision to overturn the advice of his own group of drug
> experts by pressing ahead with a tougher policy on cannabis could face a
> high court challenge from campaigners.
>
> As the report from the 23-strong Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs
> (ACMD) recommending that cannabis should remain a class C drug was
> delivered yesterday to the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, it was widely
> reported that Gordon Brown would ignore its findings.
>
> "Whitehall sources" were reported as indicating that the prime minister
> would formally respond to their report after the local elections next
> week.
>
> "Mr Brown has made clear that, notwithstanding the scientific evidence,
> there are other considerations," a Whitehall source was quoted as saying.
>
> "These include expressing concern about the involvement of serious crime
> in the cannabis trade and sending a signal, as a government and as a
> society, that this drug is a danger to health." ...
|
| Show full article (5.64Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: ClaudeClaude Date: Apr 29, 2008 12:14
> *From:* Dr John Watson NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com>
> *Date:* Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:46:25 +0100
>
> Gordon Brown's decision to overturn the advice of his own group of
> drug
> experts by pressing ahead...
|
| Show full article (6.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: mustaphasiddiquemustaphasiddique Date: Apr 29, 2008 12:46
On 29 Apr, 09:35, Andy googlemail.com> wrote:
> Imagine if you could not taste, smell or see the
> difference between beer and whisky- drinking would be incredibly
> dangerous as the drinker wouldn't know how much alcohol there were
> consuming. The high THC-varieties of cannabis can render the unaware
> user in a state where they are a danger to themselves or others.
THC does not work like that. It is a 'saturation'
drug (I use the word 'drug' loosely.)
As you say with alcohol the more you take in the
more its effect on the body until at extreme levels
of intake it can cause death.
With Cannabis you reach a saturation point
where taking any more in is meaningless. It
simply wont have any more effect. This is why
it is so safe with respect to really dangerous
drugs like alcohol.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SvenneSvenne Date: Apr 29, 2008 13:42
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:14 +0100 (BST), Claude@ aol.com (Claude) wrote:
>Ministers and Parliament make the law and there is a very clear
>majority in the House of Commons for re classification. It is actually overwhelming
>now, with even some prominent LibDems having second...
|
| Show full article (1.38Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr John WatsonDr John Watson Date: Apr 29, 2008 14:30
Noticed at Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:35:53 -0700: Andy informed us:
> Interesting conversation with my former GP over this....
>
> He's personally seen a lot of mental illness amongst cannabis smokers.
> However he's yet to meet such a patient with no previous history of such
> diseases. His conclusion seemed to be that schizophrenics like smoking
> pot- they find it relaxing. A kind of itch-scratch relationship.
One of the ingredients in cannabis - cannabidiol (CBD) is an
anti-psychotic. It seems likely that schizophrenics will get temporary
relief from their symptoms, which is why they self-medicate. However, the
THC may worsen their condition.
> My personal experience would go along with this. It can certainly make
> mental problems worse, but does it cause them where they don't exist in
> the first place? I think the answer is no. In the few...
|
| Show full article (2.78Kb) |
| 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Dr John WatsonDr John Watson Date: Apr 29, 2008 14:32
Noticed at Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:46:00 -0700: mustaphasiddique informed us:
> With Cannabis you reach a saturation point where taking any more in is
> meaningless. It simply wont have any more effect. This is why it is so
> safe with respect to really dangerous drugs like alcohol.
The reason being that THC attaches to the anandamide receptors. When all
the receptors are occupied, any further amount of THC won't have a free
receptor, so it does nothing.
--
Dr John Watson
Baker Street
|
| |
| 5 Comments |
|
  |
Author: JethroJethro Date: Apr 29, 2008 15:11
"Dr John Watson" NOSPAM.hotpotmail.com> wrote in message
news:67oimeF2qdlbcU1@mid.individual.net...
> Noticed at Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:35:53 -0700: Andy informed us:
>
>> Interesting conversation with my former GP over this....
>>
>> He's personally seen a lot of mental illness amongst cannabis smokers.
>> However he's yet to meet such a patient with no previous history of such
>> diseases. His conclusion seemed to be that schizophrenics like smoking
>> pot- they find it relaxing. A kind of itch-scratch relationship.
>
> One of the ingredients in cannabis - cannabidiol (CBD) is an
> anti-psychotic. It seems likely that schizophrenics will get temporary
> relief from their symptoms, which is why they self-medicate. However, the
> THC may worsen their condition.
>
>> My personal experience would go along with this. It can certainly make
>> mental problems worse, but does it cause them where they don't exist in
>> the first place? I think the answer is no. In the few cases where this
>> is claimed, it is difficult, maybe impossible to accurately diagnose any ...
|
| Show full article (4.12Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: parris_kparris_k Date: Apr 29, 2008 15:25
On 29 Apr, 15:11, "Jethro" hotmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder if the current explosion in cocaine
> use is related to the crack scares of the 90s ?
Several ex-member of the GMP swear they actually CREATED the crack
epidemic in Manchester - fact-finding tours to the US in the 80's got
them all a-quiver at the crack menace in the US, the US officers told
them it was only a matter of time before it reached Britain's shores,
so the undercover units started trying to buy it off UK dealers.. UK
dealers had never heard of it but responded to the (artificial)
demand. As the story goes.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: JethroJethro Date: Apr 29, 2008 15:29
> On 29 Apr, 15:11, "Jethro" hotmail.com> wrote:
>> I wonder if the current explosion in cocaine
>> use is related to the crack scares of the 90s ?
>
> Several ex-member of the GMP swear they actually CREATED the crack
> epidemic in Manchester - fact-finding tours to the US in the 80's got
> them all a-quiver at the crack menace in the US, the US officers told
> them it was only a matter of time before it reached Britain's shores,
> so the undercover units started trying to buy it off UK dealers.. UK
> dealers had never heard of it but responded to the (artificial)
> demand. As the story goes.
It's quite a plausible scenario. The more the media bangs on about how bad
"skunk" is, the more kids will feel they are playing it safe by sticking to
"normal cannabis". If the government were serious about protecting kids from
drugs they'd make sure the message wasn't as confused and contradictory as
it is.
What, you mean they're *not* serious ?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|