> It's laughable really. My suspicion is that genuine scientists are not
> questioning this data - in spite of what is being released to the media -
> rather some quasi religious organisation that just WANTS this to be
> significant in terms of religious evidence. As you rightly point out,
> even if the material could be dated to this period in time (....which is
> highly unlikely anyway given previous testing) it shows nothing that
> supports the religious claims......