uk.philosophy.humanism
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.philosophy.humanism only
 
Advanced search
May 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
   1234 18
567891011 19
12131415161718 20
19202122232425 21
262728293031  22
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
uk.philosophy.humanism Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Nice point         


Author: Peter Brooks
Date: May 1, 2008 00:05

I don't really want to get into another long, and fruitless discussion
on quantum mechanics. However there was an interesting article that I
read recently, I think in the New Scientist, though I don't have the
reference.

I liked the point made about hidden variables. A mathematician was
quoted as saying that it would be odd if there weren't any hidden
variables as, without them, how would objects showing statistical
regularities 'know' what regularities they were supposed to be
showing.

I thought it a very nice point. After all, statistics (though some
invest it with more god-like powers) only shows regularities because
they are caused by an underlying behaviour. Truly random things don't
and can't show statistical regularities - if they do it proves that
they aren't random.
15 Comments