uk.people.consumers.ebay
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.people.consumers.ebay only
 
Advanced search
December 2006
motuwethfrsasuw
    123 48
45678910 49
11121314151617 50
18192021222324 51
25262728293031 52
2006
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
uk.people.consumers.ebay Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  MI5 Persecution: Observer article         


Author: MI5Victim
Date: Dec 31, 2006 16:28

Observer article 9/March/1997
Fame at last! In an alleged book review in the Observer (Books p16), Jay Rayner writes about a "man called Bob"
(one of my many pseudonyms) in whom "a lot of people have shown an interest". Read and ponder!

Perhaps the Chinese curse "may you live in interesting times" could be re-worded into "may you be considered an
interesting person". Infamy, infamy, they've all got it in for me!

1465

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
no comments
  Re: Lowering the BIN price?         


Author: Nick
Date: Dec 31, 2006 15:32

"higgins@work" <the.best.names.are.gone@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167605943.044419.185790@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...
>
> David Wright wrote:
>
>>> If a statement like ;
>>> "I reserve the right to end auction early as item is advertised
elsewhere"
>>> and the item is pulled, I'd like to see eBay impose that the selling
fees
>>> at
>>> the point of removal are applied.
>>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Cars are harder to sell on eBay because, unless you are a fool, you're
not
>> going to bid before you've taken a look
> ...
Show full article (0.77Kb)
no comments
  Real Saddam hanging tape         


Author: Ubi
Date: Dec 31, 2006 12:14

Real Saddam hanging tape
In case you can't find the Arab TV network version - the one that doesn't
stop at the vital moment it's here: http://youtubevideo.pbwiki.com/
1 Comment
  MI5 Persecution: .net magazine article         


Author: MI5Victim
Date: Dec 31, 2006 11:09

.net magazine article March/1998

Britain's .net Magazine featured my website on page 17 of their March 1998 issue (number 42). They quote from the "FAQ"
pages, and also include some details of the evidence I have tried to present on my website.

The age of some of the material on the website shows in this review, which says the case "has been discussed in uk.*
newsgroups during the past year". At this time (March 1998) it has been discussed on uk.misc for three years, and there
are still occasional traces of the discussion going on.

540

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
no comments
  Re: Hang on everyone who's digging at Funfly         


Author: Alison Hopkins
Date: Dec 31, 2006 10:35

"Spacker" wrote in message
news:45a10007.23278437@news.astraweb.com...
> "Dr Zoidberg" drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>>I've never actually met Niel either , but have known him online for
>>several
>>years and if one is the sock-puppet of the other it's the most impressive
>>job ever , both of them having independently verifiable identities in
>>different parts of the country
>
> Thats what they said about Marilyn Monroe and Adolf Hitler.

That's a clean keyboard you owe me.

Ali
1 Comment
  Re: Hang on everyone who's digging at Funfly         


Author: Alison Hopkins
Date: Dec 31, 2006 10:34

"Spacker" wrote in message
news:459efedd.22980031@news.astraweb.com...
> Apparently people in this group have had their listings and/or
> feedback wrecked just for getting into an argument with some psycho,
> imagine what fun they could have if they knew more than just your ebay
> username.

I can see that as a good argument for not using your EBay handle on Usenet -
I don't, and have never revealed it.

Then there are the less polite groups to consider. Anyone
> using easily tracable names has either vastly underestimated the
> number of psychos on usenet, or they have just adopted the name of one
> of their real life enemies.

Heh. You've never been on rastv or ukrm, then. I've frequented both, and
they are definitely NOT polite. To say the least.

Ali
5 Comments
  Re: Lowering the BIN price?         


Author: David Wright
Date: Dec 31, 2006 10:24

> If a statement like ;
> "I reserve the right to end auction early as item is advertised elsewhere"
> and the item is pulled, I'd like to see eBay impose that the selling fees
> at
> the point of removal are applied.
>

Why?

Cars are harder to sell on eBay because, unless you are a fool, you're not
going to bid before you've taken a look - which takes time and effort for
both parties - and cars are, I assume, much more expensive than the average
price of things sold on eBay, so I offered BIN and listed at the same price
at Autotrader too - if someone comes along, likes it enough and thinks its
worth the asking price, I'm going to sell it straight away - I'm not going
to wait x more days "just in case" the eBay auction reaches that price!!
Show full article (1.16Kb)
no comments
  Re: Lowering the BIN price?         


Author: Nick
Date: Dec 31, 2006 10:05

"David Wright" googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:4vq106F1c1kfrU1@mid.individual.net...
>> You can't change an item when there are bids.
>> The BIN price disappears once the bids have met the reserve anyway.
>>
>> You could end the auction early and sell to the current highest bidder
>> at the current price though.
>>
>
> Yep, just worked this out for myself - ta - as soon as the first bid over
> reserve arrived, the BIN vanished. But it is still listed on Autotrader,
so
> any good offer near the original BIN and I'd close the eBay auction
anyway.
> Not sure that's good practice, but it seems to be perfectly normal for
most
> car auctions to state that they are listed elsewhere too!
>
> D.
> ...
Show full article (0.95Kb)
no comments
  Re: Accepting returns         


Author: Red Wimp
Date: Dec 31, 2006 09:37

He paid by paypal not sure how can mark as unpaid, and then how would he get
the money back.
I am thinking of asking the buyer to start a dispute goods not as described.
Show full article (0.94Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: VAT inclusive prices when selling to the public. ASA ruling.         


Author: Ivor Jones
Date: Dec 31, 2006 09:07

"Harry Stottle" nospam.uk.co> wrote in
message
news:45978f8a$0$97274$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net
> There have been several discussions in various newsgroups
> recently about if companies are obliged to quote VAT
> inclusive prices when advertising goods or items for sale
> to the general public. The main objectors against quoting
> VAT inclusive prices have been companies that sell to
> other companies, but who also sell to the general public,
> and their argument was that because they do not have to
> quote VAT inclusive prices when selling to other
> companies, this somehow excuses them from quoting VAT
> inclusive prices if they also sell to the general public.

Interesting though this thread is, may I ask the relevance to
uk.telecom.voip..?

Ivor
3 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9