I rarely have to post to moderated groups but last evening at 18.30 I
posted to uk.legal.moderated

Its now 08.50 the following day and the moderation.org.uk site still
shows the post awaiting moderation. That's over 14 hours and counting.
Assuming that any reply takes the same time to appear, it makes the
newsgroup completely useless for me.

WereEveryWhere.net seeks to become the most popular Social Networking Website
offering an interactive, user-submitted network of friends, personal profiles,
video chat, blogs, groups, photos, music and videos for adults internationally.

Log on at http://www.WereEveryWhere.net Its FREE!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--This Message Has Been Posted Using A Trial Version Of Message Poster 2003--

http://worldindianmodels.blogspot.com/

http://southgirlsnorthgirlsworldgirls.blogspot.com/

:-)

I attempted to post an article which was crossposted to
uk.legal.moderated and cam.transport. My article was silently
discarded (without even any log entry at the moderation website).
When I complained the moderators referred to this document:
http://www.uklegal.fsnet.co.uk/ulm.htm
(of which had previously been unaware).

As far as I can see there is no particular reason for a blanket ban on
crossposted articles. It's not mentioned in the actual charter at:
http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.legal.moderated.html

I think the moderators may be under the misapprehension that there is
some general technical or policy reason why crossposting between
moderated and unmoderated groups doesn't work or should be prevented.
Certainly the discussion in ulm suggests that this view is not
uncommon.

Before I take the matter up with the ulm moderators I would like to
establish the consensus here on the general question: is crossposting
always harmful, or can be useful (obviously at the discretion of the
moderators according to the circumstances, group charter, etc.)

How many of you here are the result of it?

A couple of recent posts to uk.legal.moderated have been rejected by
the moderators on the grounds that they were potentially defamatory,
but the full (potentially defamatory) text is available on the
moderation web site. This seems unwise, as they are effectively
published on moderation.org.uk.

MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny. They're Watching Me

Central to the. persecution campaign waged against me for some nine years
now by the Security Service is their use. of the media, and in particular
the broadcast media, to. make clear to me that I am under surveillance and
being. watched within my own home, even by BBC newscasters while they read
the news. This is really an. act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the
television and radio are so sure that. they can never be caught, that they
have many times made explicity clear. on broadcast programmes that they are
as capable of seeing me as. I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even
when they have. known I am taping the programmes they still carry on this
practice; for examples. of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see
the Evidence. area of my website.

If you. wish to reply to this article......
then please include your name and. fax number! I provide the means for
recipients to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but. ask that
you provide me with your fax number or email address. if you require a
response.. Also would you please send not more than one or two pages, if by
fax.. Thank-you!

It started with a Newscaster,. and it continues with Newscasters today

Four Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on. Internet Newsgroups

For approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution, from. June
1990 until late 1992, I. kept as quiet as possible, in the hope that by not
reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would. simply go away
of their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some. people employ
against bullies; if the. bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might
simply go away and victimize. someone else.

Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The. quieter I became, the more
shrill and hysterical the noise. from the Security Service operatives. For
about two years I didnt watch TV news at all.. Yet this only heightened
their obsessed fixation; they continued to. follow me wherever I went, they
continued to induce harassment at work by. managers and fellow workers, and
they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to. regard my
refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right" by. ever
more. extreme forms of abuse.